18 September 2025

The tide's turning on soy sauce fish, ACT Government 'strongly' considers phase out

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
59
hand holding soy sauce fish

The ACT Greens want the Territory to follow South Australia’s lead and ban plastic fish-shaped soy sauce bottles. Photo: James Coleman.

The ACT Government will “strongly” consider phasing out additional single-use plastics after South Australia banned soy sauce fish containers at the start of this month.

The South Australian Government banned the plastic fish-shaped containers from 1 September, stating “more manageable alternatives” such as sachets, squeezable packs, or certified compostable containers could replace the “convenience packaging”.

The ACT Greens want the Territory to follow suit at once.

Deputy leader Jo Clay said the ACT Government had banned plastics before – such as heavyweight plastic shopping bags from the start of 2024 and plastic straws from 2022 – and should do so again.

“Canberrans want to do the right thing by the planet. But it isn’t always easy and too often our systems put the blame and guilt on individuals rather than provide convenient and accessible solutions for people,” she said.

“[The ACT Government’s] banned single-use plastics – like cutlery, bowls, plates, polystyrene takeaway containers and much more – in partnership with impacted businesses and in consultation with the community [before].

“If we don’t ban or recycle these items, they have a higher chance to become litter, run off into our waterways, and cause real harm to our birds, fish and wildlife that mistake them for food.”

READ ALSO Suspected arson attack brings forward consultation on the future of Wakefield Gardens

Ms Clay wrote to Environment Minister Suzanne Orr and City Services Minister Tara Cheyne on 11 September.

She raised concerns that Canberra’s new recycling facility won’t be able to process smaller items of plastic, such as the soy sauce containers, stating this was another reason why the government needed to start finding an alternative solution to convenience packaging now.

“There are already solutions that have a low impact on the community, like soy sauce bottles being provided at cafes and restaurants,” Ms Clay argued.

“Government doesn’t really have a strong reason to not consider this, despite saying it is not being considered.

“My question to the ACT Labor Government is: will you run a consultation on how to ban soy sauce fish, and change plans so small plastics can be recycled in our new facility? Or will you condemn these containers and other items of small plastic to landfill and as litter in our parks and public places forever?”

At the 10 December 2024, Environment Ministers Meeting, the ACT Government was among the jurisdictions that agreed to work together to reduce variations of 24 items listed in the National Roadmap: Harmonising action on problematic and unnecessary plastics.

Single-serve pre-packaged condiment containers, such as soy sauce fish, are on the list.

All jurisdictions – excluding Queensland – also agreed to “coordinate future action to be consistent to the extent possible”.

An ACT Government spokesperson told Region that it was “expected” other jurisdictions would consider how they’d take action on the listed items “by considering their local context”.

“Phasing out additional single-use plastics such as soy sauce fish containers will be strongly considered in future efforts to identify other items that could be removed from circulation,” they said.

“The government continues to identify problematic waste streams that can be phased out from circulation. This includes plastics, such as the soy sauce fish containers. The next set of items to be phased out has not yet been determined.

“Before any ‘bans’ occur, it is necessary to undertake consultation with stakeholders and the public to ensure practical alternatives are available and everyone is well-informed of any phase-out.”

READ ALSO Changing budget papers most transparent way to compensate Calvary for hospital acquisition

Household packaging with a plastic identification code of 1, 2, 3 and 5 are sorted and baled for recycling at Canberra’s Materials Recovery Facility (as long as they are empty and dry).

This can include ice-cream containers, yoghurt tubs, berry punnets and biscuit trays.

Plastic items such as chip packets, coffee cup lids, plastic wrap and squeeze bottles are not accepted for recycling at the centre. Items smaller than a credit card – including milk bottle lids and metal beer bottle caps – are too small to be sorted.

“Items smaller than a credit card cannot be recycled through the ACT’s yellow-lidded recycling bin collection service,” the government spokesperson said.

“Soy sauce fish containers are not recycled at materials recovery facilities as they are too small and fall through the sorting equipment and are treated as contamination.

“Soy-sauce fish containers currently need to go in the general waste bin and then go to landfill. Alternative single-serve soy sauce sachets are not accepted in recycling bins and should be placed in the general waste bin.”

Organisations such as Lids4Kids and RecycleSmart also do not accept plastic soy sauce fish.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

59
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Geoff Milton1:12 pm 12 Oct 25

Everyone knows it’s environmentally bad. Just do it like straws and coffee cups. It can’t be that hard to do on a national level

Is it nobler in the mind to be upset about fish sauce bottles or to upset about other people being upset about fish sauce bottles? That is the question.

Just do it. The Local Council talks too much and does so little. They managed with plastic bags. How hard could it be?

As someone who has worked in a Recycling Centre, I can vouch for this. The recycling goes through a large machine that is divided into different sections. The machine can sort out plastic, paper and metal but it can only do so much. It takes humans to sort out the details of the recycling, a lot of it too small to grab or handle considering larger items of recycling coming at you too fast to deal with.

The “big issue” crowd…lol…OK well we’ll just have government that can only do one thing at a time….which one goes first? Clueless.

Meanwhile walking around beautiful Canberra I don’t miss the plastic waste at all.

Happy to see as much unnecessary plastic being fazed out but maybe look at things with a bigger return first. Take vitamins and supplements for example. You could make 10 soy fish out of the excess plastic used in most vitamin containers. When you open the lid the contents are lucky to fill the container 20% full.

This government is GREAT at telling us lots of things I can’t do!

It’s not just the government it’s nearly eeeeeeeveryone! Over the years I’ve witness heaps of environmental campaigners protesting to ban something bad. Which is good BUT none of them come up with a good alternative or solution to the problem. It’s mostly out of negativity and a desire to feed the ego.

Like any of this is saving the planet don’t be dumb. Anyone asking China and India to back off on plastic I don’t think so. Ban plastic bags yeah world saved, well you can have one for 20 cents until we get paper. Now we have china made paper and still get charged. Total joke. Nothing done is saving the planet get a life

If only they could find actual alternatives before just banning stuff …the paper bags can’t even last the distance to the carpark (we ditched them 40 years ago for a reason), and the paper straws won’t see out your drink (and taint the whole drink so no matter what you drink, it just tastes like soggy cardboard). It’s a race to the bottom.

“Like any of this is saving the planet don’t be dumb.”, it’s pretty dumb to suggest this is a planet saving measure.

Oh and paper bags are fine, like seriously drama queens bagging on about not being get to the carpark with their paper bag begs the question how do these people function in the real world if everything is so fraught.

I don’t missed the plastic rubbish when I’m walking around beautiful Canberra.

The reason for paper it was better for the environment. The paper bags are made from virgin paper and manufactured by children overseas. Likely more petrol is burnt into the atmosphere in making them than if you made plastic ones and incinerated them afterwards.

A quick google search would reveal that most of that is either BS or been grossly misrepresented. That doesn’t mean there aren’t problems or that every paper bag from every vendor in country is sustainably sourced but the vast majority (ie. the ones provided by the big retailers are).

You really need to apply some critical thinking to the stuff you’re reposting from Telegram.

Plastic rubbish is everywhere nothing changed in beautiful Canberra

How is it “beautiful” and “Plastic rubbish is everywhere nothing changed” you contradict yourself in one sense.

In the real world there is far too much plastic pollution but in Canberra there’s less of it than there was.

I bet all these people are buying plastic clothes and then donating them. When they get donated they get shipped overseas and dumped into the ocean.

There is no science behind these laws. Its purely tokenism.

If the greens had their way we’d all be forced into veganism

Danger Mouse6:34 pm 18 Sep 25

‘There is no science behind these laws. ‘

I mean, it’s not going to help globally, but less plastic in local waterways is only a good thing.

“I bet all these people are buying plastic clothes and then donating them. When they get donated they get shipped overseas and dumped into the ocean.”

That’s a problem that should be solved but that would take government intervening. But you seem to against governments solving problems, well at least problems you don’t care about or governments you support…I’m sure even you can see the dilemma here Henry.

Whats to say these end up in water ways. Its just microplastics like the paint on your car or house or the shoes you wear out.

Governments help the people not the other way around. Kids should be educated so they can decide. Not told that the government alone will sort it out.
More government control means people act passive aggressively.

Sign me up for the government sponsored locally grown and manufactured cotton clothes.

Fringe issues are a waste of time

Henry you’re making little to no sense.

You’re banging on about governments being too in control and then calling for government control over local cotton clothes manufacture. It’s illogical at best.

The problem is that plastic waste ends up in water ways and it doesn’t break down but does cause harm to the environment. Anyone who has helped out on clean up Australia day knows this.

What’s wrong with cutting off pollution at the source?

It seems to be that as ever your gripe here is that you don’t like this government, and as such won’t accept anything they do, but I’m guessing (from reading your comments) would give a pass to anything a government you support did.

Personally I don’t know how people live with that level of cognitive dissonance.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.