18 January 2026

Waste-to-energy incinerators banned indefinitely in the ACT

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
8
Hume recycling facility rubbish

Canberra’s recycling waste continues to be sorted in Hume before it’s transported interstate. Photo: Claire Fenwicke.

The ACT Greens’ deputy leader said she’s “delighted” a legislative update on the Territory’s position that a ban on waste-to-energy incinerators has been extended indefinitely.

Jo Clay recently called on the ACT Government to renew the 2020-25 policy which covers projects such as the incineration, gasification and pyrolysis of rubbish to be turned into energy.

“Following the NSW Government’s proposal for a waste-to-energy incinerator in Tarago, people in Canberra and the Queanbeyan and Goulburn regions have contacted the Greens concerned about the impact it will have on our region,” she said.

“Waste-to-energy produces harmful byproducts and pollutants like heavy metals, toxic air pollutants, bottom ash, furans and dioxins. It poses many risks for people, nature, our waterways, agriculture and our climate.

“Burning waste for energy creates greenhouse gas emissions and is not a sustainable or efficient source of energy.”

When contacted by Region, an ACT Government spokesperson clarified the policy had been extended in May 2025.

“The code of practice remains in force and does not contain an official sunset clause,” they said.

“The principles of the policy, including the ban on the thermal treatment of waste, are established in the Code of Practice.”

READ ALSO AFPA welcomes royal commission, renews calls for broader scope for Richardson review

Ms Clay welcomed the clarification as she said many people in the region were “nervous” about incineration.

“I’m delighted to hear ACT Government say they’re interpreting their code as a permanent ban on incinerators, despite the fact that it implements a policy that was for 2020-2025,” she said.

“It’s great to have this confirmed. I assume the legislation will be updated when it can be to make it clear this is a permanent ban.”

Capital Recycling Solutions lodged a development application for a waste incineration facility in Canberra in 2017.

The ACT Government spokesperson confirmed no proposals to establish an incinerator had been lodged since the policy was originally released in 2020.

Ms Clay has also urged the ACT Government to get moving on its plans to establish a circular economy in Canberra.

The Circular Economy Strategy was launched in 2023 with food waste recycling identified as a key action to make this happen.

This step has been frustrated by the fire that destroyed the Hume Recovery Facility on Boxing Day in 2022, which resulted in the planned food and organics (FOGO) composting facility’s timeline being pushed back (now not expected to be operational until 2028).

READ ALSO Rare Googong koala sighting raises hopes of local population

Ms Clay said more needed to be done now.

“In the ACT, we have a resource recovery target of 90 per cent. But our actual resource recovery has dropped to only 65 per cent,” she said.

“We need local recycling facilities that can process household waste so there’s no need to burn it – like soft plastics.

“Instead, the ACT Labor Government sits back and waits for a federal scheme to manage soft plastics, even though it’s taken decades to progress.”

The ACT Government spokesperson said implementing its ACT Circular Economy Strategy and Action Plan was a priority and it had plans beyond the new recycling facility to increase Canberra’s resource recovery rates.

“The Government will also continue to consider problematic waste streams, including single-use plastics with suitable alternatives that can be phased out from circulation and look further at the potential to expand the ACT Container Deposit Scheme,” they said.

“Work is also under way to investigate the feasibility of a textiles hub to reduce problematic textile and clothing waste and support our craft community.”

The old Hume Recovery Facility was demolished in August 2025 and construction of the new facility is due to begin this year.

Current contractor Re-Group will continue providing recycling services until the project is complete, with Canberra’s recycled material being transported interstate.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Jane Bremmer5:43 pm 19 Jan 26

Waste to energy incineration emits more GHGs than coal, oil and gas. That’s because they rely on plastic for the calorific value but this is a very toxic fossil fuel that we should no be building a waste to energy industry around. Waste incineration emits twice as much climate pollution as gas and about 1.7 times as much as coal. Please see – https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371233059_Waste_incinerators_undermine_clean_energy_goals

Jane Bremmer5:38 pm 19 Jan 26

It is not true that burning waste for energy is better than landfill or burning coal. Waste to energy incineration relies on plastic as a fuel which is a fossil fuel based material that comes with many toxic chemical additives. Burning residual waste in waste incinerators generates deadly pollution – so toxic that it is the subject of at least 3 international conventions. Methane generated in landfill is a very polluting GHG. It is created by putting organic waste in landfill. Australian state and federal governments have a FOGO policy exactly to address this. In 2026 no waste should go to landfill untreated anyway. Landfills should be fully lined with vapour/landfill gas extraction and residual waste should be pre-treated to remove any remaining organic waste and then stabilise, sanitise and process residual waste before it is landfilled. So comparing incinerators with landfill is a false comparison. When you take out the organic waste, incinerators are by far greater polluters and threats to our climate, health and environment. Waste incinerators also emit more ghg’s than coal, oil and gas per unit of energy making them one of the biggest climate and toxic air polluting industries on the planet. They are in the top 5 industries for deadly mercury pollution and Persistent Organic Pollutants (like Dioxin) and require secure hazardous waste landfills for their huge volumes of highly toxic and hazardous waste ash…destroying the claim that incinerators eliminate landfill. They do not. They create the need for largescale hazardous waste disposal while destroying finite resources which could be reused, recycled or composted. 60-70% of the red bin (residual waste) is in fact waste that shouldn’t be there because its recyclable, or compostable. Please do your research as Australia is currently in the grip of extreme industry propaganda about waste to energy incineration. Facts matter. Here’s a good place to start – https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383692205_Waste_Incineration_and_the_Environment

I’m surprised as I would’ve thought the Greens would enthusiastically support the idea of waste being converted into energy. I feel like this is a mistake and some other part of Australia or another country, which will make us look bad.

Not sure this a smart idea.
Firstly most of this rubbish will now go to landfill and its better than burning coal for electricity.

I agree which is why I’m surprised the Greens disapprove of it.

So Sweden and Japan are idiots? It’s not 80s any more and experimenting with this technology. They have it figured out and meet all requirements. More scare tactics by politicians from shit tech in the past. Australia is so far behind anything and everything but politicians smile and say hey we’re awesome and saving the planet. Let’s keep paying how much to send garbage away? Oh then they stop buying it so dig a whole. Electric garbage trucks next. More paper straws so dumb

Yeah, back in 2001 I used to think Australia was an environmentally friendly country, until a friend who worked for an investment company corrected me. I discovered in particular, Scandinavian countries were centuries ahead in environmental science.

Jane Bremmer5:47 pm 19 Jan 26

Its actually a myth that Nordic Countries love waste incineration. In fact they have invested so much in sustainable waste management they now have to import waste to feed their incinerators. Instead they recommend Advanced Waste Sorting technologies for residual waste. The EU Commission recommends against waste incineration in their 2017 EU Directive on the role of waste to energy in the Circular Economy. Im glad the ACT is acknowledging this and not repeating the mistakes of Europe that now has a significant overcapacity and looking for ways to shift their system.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.