13 July 2026

Wedge-tailed eagle deaths at NSW wind farm spark calls for stronger wildlife protections

| By Naziya Alvi Rahman
Join the conversation
37
wedge tailed eagle on branch

Yass Valley Councillor Alvaro Charry said the deaths of the wedge-tailed eagles were “deeply saddening and concerning”. Photo: Jacqui Barker.

The reported deaths of 20 wedge-tailed eagles at the Rye Park Wind Farm over the past 18 months have sparked calls for stronger wildlife protections, with community leaders, farmers and conservation advocates urging governments to make bird-strike mitigation technology mandatory at wind farms.

Rye Park is a 396-megawatt (MW) wind farm located 11 km north of Yass. The project area spans the Hilltops, Upper Lachlan and Yass Valley local government areas.

The figures, revealed by Tilt Renewables during a meeting of the Rye Park Community Consultative Committee (CCC), have also prompted questions over whether more could have been done to protect one of Australia’s largest birds of prey.

Yass Valley Councillor Alvaro Charry, who represents the council on the committee, said learning of the deaths was “deeply saddening and concerning”.

“The wedge-tailed eagle is one of our nation’s most iconic native birds. It also holds profound cultural significance as the sacred totem of the Ngunnawal People,” he told Region.

“To hear that so many of these majestic birds have been lost is distressing and raises important questions about how these impacts are being managed and mitigated.”

Following the meeting, the committee formally requested that Tilt Renewables provide a detailed report in October outlining all recorded bird and bat strike incidents across the wind farm, the measures already in place to reduce wildlife deaths, additional mitigation strategies under consideration, and how incidents are reported to the NSW Government.

READ ALSO Classroom computer use under review but will ACT kids get a digital detox?

While describing renewable energy as essential to Australia’s future, Cr Charry said protecting wildlife could not become an afterthought.

“Renewable energy projects are an important part of Australia’s diversified energy future, but that goal must be pursued responsibly,” he said, stressing that he remains a strong advocate for renewable energy.

“Protecting biodiversity and respecting our cultural and environmental heritage must remain central to how these projects are planned, operated and continually improved.”

The figures have also reignited calls from Farmers for Climate Action to make proven bird-protection technology a standard requirement for new wind farms.

“The shift to clean energy can be kind to nature,” the organisation said.

It pointed to several technologies already being used successfully overseas and in Australia, including cameras that automatically stop turbine blades when wedge-tailed eagles approach, radar systems that detect birds in flight and painting one turbine blade black to improve its visibility.

The group said camera technology had already proven effective at two Tasmanian wind farms without affecting profitability.

“The time for consideration is over. The time for action is now,” it said.

“We ask the government to make these bird-kill mitigation measures standard conditions for wind farm approval.”

Tilt Renewables said it took any impact on native wildlife seriously and had been actively monitoring bird strikes since the wind farm began operating.

“We take seriously any impacts our wind farms have on the local environment—especially in relation to bird strikes,” a spokesperson told Region.

READ ALSO Petitions couldn't save Kaleen Indoor Sports Centre, now it prepares for demolition

The company said trained detection dogs regularly searched around turbines for bird deaths, with every wedge-tailed eagle fatality immediately reported to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure.

Importantly, the company acknowledged the problem was greater at Rye Park than elsewhere in its portfolio.

“This process has alerted us that wedge-tailed eagle impacts are higher than expected at Rye Park compared to our other wind farms, and we are doing something about this,” the spokesperson said.

Tilt said it had developed a dedicated Wedge-tailed Eagle Mitigation Plan in consultation with government agencies, ecologists and a wedge-tailed eagle specialist.

Among the first measures already underway is the removal of sheep and cattle carcasses and rabbit warrens to reduce food sources that attract eagles to the wind farm.

The company said additional mitigation measures would be introduced once agreed with the NSW Government.

The effectiveness of those measures is likely to come under scrutiny when Tilt Renewables returns to the Community Consultative Committee in October with the detailed report requested by local representatives.

Original Article published by Naziya Alvi Rahman on About Regional.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

37
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

How many sheep and cattle are flying through the turbines?

The solution already exists, these things only last 15 years.

Susan Truesdale1:55 pm 14 Jul 26

I have literally just read an article where strike deaths dropped by 72 % just by painting one blade black.

Sounds like the real error here was not starting with the mitigation strategies to begin with. They are well known in the industry and used at multiple other sites across Australia to reduce the presence of birds directly around the wind turbines.

Its not particularly hard to work out or implement. But alas, even at these levels, the damage to birds is but a smidgen on the number of birds killed by the outputs of coal power plants and the like.

But the fossil fuel shills on here won’t ever admit that I’m sure.

JS9 perhaps you could provide some evidence to support the statement “a smidgen on the number of birds killed by the outputs of coal power plants and the like.”

A Copilot query provided this:

“There is no widely reported or nationally compiled figure for how many wedge‑tailed eagles are killed by coal-fired power plants themselves.

Most documented human-caused deaths of wedge‑tailed eagles are associated with:

* Power lines and electrical infrastructure (collisions and electrocution). In Tasmania, 110 wedge‑tailed eagles were confirmed injured or killed by powerline infrastructure between 2017 and 2023. [utas.edu.au], [birdlife.org.au]

* Wind turbines, vehicles, poisoning, and habitat loss, which are regularly monitored in wildlife studies.”

In other words, your statement is blatantly false.

Capital Retro10:47 am 14 Jul 26

If your (and chewy’s) claims are true shouldn’t we stop buying solar panels and wind turbines made in China because that is where all the fossil fuel pollution is occurring.

I think that will leave you both looking like shags on rocks.

BTW, did you know the Chinese use shags to catch fish? It’s very cruel how it is done.

How cute. Penfold using copilot. The font of all reliability. The fact you couldn’t even ask the right question shows your stupidity continues. If only I’d thrown a percentage question in there to really confuse you.

How about you start with the fact I said ‘birds’, not wedge tailed eagles….

A copilot query 😂😂😂

JS9 did you happen to read the first sentence of that link …. no, don’t answer that:

“Environmentalists and environmental scientists have criticized wind energy in various forums for its negative impacts on wildlife, especially birds. “

Interesting though that you seem not to realise you used a search engine to find that link. (ssshhhh …. Copilot’s a search engine too).

Perhaps the next query might be “Copilot, is a wedge-tailed eagle a bird ?” 🙂

Well thanks Penfold for confirming your ability to concentrate doesn’t extend to reading past a single line. If it did, you would see what was in the second line:

“This article highlights that nuclear power and fossil-fuelled power systems have a host of environmental and wildlife costs as well, particularly for birds.”

You really are brilliant at outing yourself as a bit deficient at well, many things.

You don’t know percentages, you don’t understand the difference between using the term ‘birds’ and something far more specific, you don’t understand the difference between opinions and evidence. The list goes on.

You are great at confirmation bias however. An introductory sentence is all you need it seems – or indeed in your case, spewed out vomit from a poorly trained AI tool.

In short, what it really boils down to another day, another Penfool ”How can I confirm to the world I’m truly a goose’ moment.

Lucky you didn’t read on and see the big scary percentages further down – your head might have exploded.

But hey – evidence free dribbling is your way.

So JS9 are you now a proponent of search engines, or against them ?

And is your argument now about all birds, or just Aquila audax ?

It’s all quite confusing. Though at least you’ve been able to make the link between a goose and an eagle, well done !

Btw did you know that the Cape Barren Goose (Cereopsis novaehollandiae) is native to Australia ? Well now ya know, you’re welcome.

“It’s all quite confusing.”

Yes, we know this is your usual lament Pengold, your comments and inability to read and understand scientific evidence when provided directly to you explains why.

Maybe your favourite AI can give you some pointers to help you with your confusion?

Although those type of tools often only reflect their users.

Laurence De B. Anderson3:09 pm 13 Jul 26

20 eagles in 18 months? More than one a month? You know they’re territorial? How was this determined? An observer out there day and night? I strongly doubt these figures. My son-in-law was commissioned to hang around wind farms for months and count all the bird species. Never an eagle.

I agree, this doesn’t seem right. Eagles live in breeding pairs and their territory is usually fairly large. They usually have only one or maybe two offspring and so I wonder how it is possible for there to be so many in what is likely one territory in less than two full breeding seasons.
Could these birds have been from elsewhere? I hope they conduct a full necropsy on each one of them.

Laurence, Valleygirl, the article clearly explains how these numbers were determined, the numbers are correct.

“The company said trained detection dogs regularly searched around turbines for bird deaths, with every wedge-tailed eagle fatality immediately reported to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure.”

Heywood Smith2:26 pm 14 Jul 26

@Lawrence, it doesnt matter… Its all about renewables, that’s all that matters, just ask Chewy14, he will tell ya!

Yes, but it doesn’t confirm if each of those birds were actually killed by the blades. I know it sounds a little paranoid but the deaths could have a cause which could be explained with a forensic examination. As both myself and Laurence said, the numbers don’t make sense based on normal eagle behaviour. If there’s an expert who could shed some light on this, it would be really helpful. My comments are based on my lifetime of observation and our local eagle’s breeding and territorial area as observed.

And kill more birds? Sounds logical….

It’s part and parcel of the communist climate change agenda.

Which once upon a time Justin was championed by greenies. Now they couldn’t give two hoots about animals, farms, national parks, the environment and certainly not people. All they want to do is smash our way of life.

It would seem a somewhat obvious point but the only way to protect birds against these dangerous, ghastly, ridiculously expensive and intermittent wind turbines is to not build them in the first place.

And to read that there’s now dogs being trained to find the bodies of wedge-tailed eagles is beyond awful.

So you’re offering to go completely off grid seeing as fossil fuel sources kill significantly greater amounts of wildlife proportionally when compared to renewables.

Never picked you for such a hard core greenie Penfold.

Heywood Smith11:29 am 13 Jul 26

Chewy, gotta love these types of replies from those who still rely on fossil fuels to keep warm and the lights on, yet play the ‘i care for the environment’ card. Dont suppose you keep warm with candles and cook outside using felled timber from trees nearby?

Capital Retro11:56 am 13 Jul 26

I don’t think Penfold said he would go completely off grid, chewy.

For every adult eagle whacked by one of these useless turbines a chick in the nest will probably die by starvation, too.

Eagles could become extinct like “hard core greenies” (except Bob Browne) have become extinct.

Were they ever really greenies CR ? Look at the watermelons, for example. Most of them simply wanted to ruin our way of life and found pretending to care about the environment a good place to start. Bob Brown is probably a rare exception, for all his shenanigans over the years he seems to have stuck to his environmental guns.

And so it is with the eagle versus the wind farm. And don’t forget the wombats, koalas and surely hundreds of other species who all pay a price for forests to be cleared, their environments to be trashed and then have to put up with the whoosh-whoosh noise pollution.

TG your post was difficult to make sense of though perhaps you could provide an example of the three-eyed fish. There’s plenty of places to look – Japan, France, USA, UK, China and 35 other countries. And the Loch Ness Monster while you’re at it. Thanks in advance !

But if your beef is with a few wealthy oligarchs, look no further than who finishes up with the hundreds of billions we taxpayers channel into these environmental-wrecking renewable projects. Oh the hypocrisy.

Now Penfold is the great protector of wildlife 😂😂
He just needs an excuse to get rid of solar power & his job will be complete.
Then he can retire at the Nursing Home next door to the coal fired Power Station.

Who needs an excuse franky, just look at what the krazy things have done to our power prices, energy security, the economy and national debt.

If you get out and smell the roses you might find that there’s plenty of Aussies who’d prioritise our flora and fauna well above the fictitious ramblings of those who pretend they care about the environment.

Capital Retro4:52 pm 13 Jul 26

Solar power?

It loves the sort of weather we have been getting the past few days.

Heywood Smith,
Thats a whole lot of projection you’ve got going on there.

Where did I suggest “i care for the environment” as the basis for anything in my comment?

It’s simply a fact that fossil fuel sources kill wildlife at significantly higher rates than windfarms and its not even close.

Heywood Smith10:49 am 14 Jul 26

@chewy – quote “It’s simply a fact that fossil fuel sources kill wildlife at significantly higher rates than windfarms and its not even close”.

Cool so do your part and stop using electricity… Im sure it will make a huge difference.

Isn’t it amazing Heywood how some people just make statements without the simplest shred of evidence as if they were undeniable facts ?

Heywood Smith,
Maybe you should learn to read?

Where have I suggested that complete protection of animals is a prerequisite to using electricity?

But if you were more reasonably interested in reducing harm to animals, you would be supportive of the transition to renewables that demonstrably cause less impact.

That’s what you were trying to say yeah?

Cool.

Susan Truesdale2:01 pm 14 Jul 26

They did a study in Norway and by painting 1 turbine blade black they reduced strike deaths by 72% and found no dead white tailed eagles under turbines that had the black paint

Heywood Smith2:24 pm 14 Jul 26

Sure is @Penfold. Same bloke who’s family drive ICE vehicles, use energy made from burning coal to make food, have hot water, he eats animals that produce methane gasses that we all know are terrible for the environment, yet still claims to be the worlds saviour when it comes to reducing emissions because he has a few panels on his roof.

Lol Heywood, surely you’re not suggesting hypocrisy rules here ….

Regardless, remember that virtue signalling is in the eyes of the self-declared beholder. As long as you preach your virtue and say it often enough, it must be true. As for methane gas production ….

LOL, too funny to see the pretty strawmen.

Heywood Smith is the embodiment of this meme:

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat

Hypocrisy rules indeed.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.