28 October 2025

Why a wobbly handrail has this suburb 'cautiously optimistic' about new government plan

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
11

Oaks Estate was originally part of Queanbeyan until 1911, when it was decided the ACT’s borders would follow the Queanbeyan rail line. Photo: James Coleman.

“How much budget money do you need to replace a wobbly handrail on some stairs?”

That’s the question residents of Oaks Estate are asking, even as the ACT Government releases a five-year plan aimed at addressing “community safety” issues in what’s been dubbed “Canberra’s forgotten suburb”.

Oaks Estate is tucked between the Queanbeyan railway line and the Molonglo River, and was originally part of Queanbeyan until the ACT borders were drawn in 1911.

Technically, it’s part of today’s Kurrajong electorate – alongside inner-south suburbs like Ainslie and Braddon – but its isolated location has led to issues over the years with poor public-transport connections, slow emergency-service response times, and few upgrades to infrastructure like roads, footpaths and public buildings.

For instance, the metal handrail along the Queanbeyan River heritage walk has been flagged as unsafe for years, yet no action has been taken.

But the government’s newly tabled Oaks Estate Strategic Plan 2025–2030 promises to change that and finally make the suburb – home to more than 300 residents – a “safer, healthier, and more connected place to live”.

READ ALSO Direct flights between Canberra and Avalon off to a bumpy start

Developed over two months of community consultation, the plan aims to address issues around traffic safety, the lack of signage and footpaths, open antisocial behaviour, roaming dogs, and the high proportion of public housing – up to 47 per cent of the suburb – much of which is considered not fit-for-purpose.

“The noise (loud music, yelling, fights) has been traumatic for myself and my family, the violence with weapons (guns, hammers, machetes) is frightening, and the high traffic of drugs is disturbing,” one resident wrote to the government.

Independent Kurrajong MLA Thomas Emerson, who joined forces with the Canberra Liberals and ACT Greens earlier this year to pressure the government for the plan, welcomed its release.

“Today is a good day for Oaks Estate,” he said.

“Residents will be relieved to see the ACT Government acknowledging the unique challenges they’re facing, and not fobbing them off to Queanbeyan.”

However, Mr Emerson criticised the plan’s “future budget processes” for failing to specify many of the key actions to be taken.

“After decades of neglect, residents deserve confidence that there will be real follow-through for Oaks Estate.”

The plan will “explore opportunities” to not only install new handrails along the river walk, but also upgrade footpaths, improve bus services, clean up public green spaces, facilitate better access to the Oaks Estate Community Hall, expand services to social-housing occupants through non-profits like Vinnies, and roll out mobile veterinary clinics for low-income residents.

ACT Government Minister for Homes and New Suburbs Yvette Berry said the plan was built on “extensive consultation”, with officials meeting with more than 10 per cent of residents over six weeks and gathering feedback online.

“The most powerful message we heard was the strong sense of community within Oaks Estate, with residents knowing and looking out for one another,” Ms Berry said.

Oaks Estate Residents Association Fiona McGregor and Inner South Canberra Community Council chair Colin Walters. Photo: James Coleman.

Yet residents remain wary.

Pointing to the “wobbly handrail” as a case in point, Oaks Estate Residents Association president Fiona McGregor said many of the plan’s proposals have been raised with government agencies repeatedly, without action.

“It’s not like we haven’t raised these things over time,” Ms McGregor said.

“To say that, yes, we’ll consider doing these things, or we’ll investigate doing these things … these matters have been drawn to the government’s attention for a long time.

“Obviously, the Residents Association is appreciative of the support that the Kurrajong MLAs have given us in moving forward to this position of having a strategic plan. We welcome it. But now the devil is in the detail, and how we move forward to implement the things that were said in the listening report – the concerns of the community – remains to be seen.”

READ ALSO Canberra’s dingoes, water rats ‘highly susceptible’ to new bird flu strain

Under the new plan, the government will establish an “executive working group” comprising Oaks Estate residents, various government directorates, ACT Policing, and community service providers such as the St Vincent de Paul Society.

Officials will meet with the Residents Association twice a year, provide annual reports to the Assembly, and publish online “traffic light” updates on progress.

Ms McGregor said residents are cautiously optimistic but want action, not just “exploration”.

“We don’t want to see us yet again forgotten in budgetary processes so nothing gets done out here,” she said.

The Oaks Estate Strategic Plan 2025-2030 is available from the ACT Government.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell3:14 pm 28 Oct 25

6% of Canberra’s households are public housing. In the Oaks Estate it’s 9%.
Public housing tenants need good access to public transport. Public transport access in the Oaks Estate is so poor that the 2021 census recorded 125 residents commuting by car, and none by public transport.
The government has spent billions of dollars to build a light rail line from Gungahlin to an Archbishop’s house. In the process it moved public housing tenants away from good public transport along the light rail route, to places like the Oaks Estate.
There is a rail line within fifty metres of the Oaks Estate. The government could use one of its reserve light rail vehicles to provide Oaks Estate residents with a direct public transport connection to Fyshwick and Kingston.

Excellent idea

I agree with most of what you have said but I am not sure if the light rail vehicles have a supercapacitor to run without overhead power. Even if they do, they wouldn’t be able to run the distance between Queanbeyan and Kingston without over power lines and both stations would need new platforms or redesigns to allow LR boarding, good luck making changes to Queabeyan Station with it’s heritage listing.

Also not confident that the heavy rail line in smooth enough for the light rail vehicles, LRV don’t have suspension like the regional trains do and sit a lot closer to the ground and rails.

Transport links from Kingston station are also woeful. It might be more efficient to have a couple of on-demand bus runs from Oaks Estate, one to the City and one to Woden.

I had to visit Oaks Estate for a maintenance job and I liked what I saw, it looked like a nice place but in need of landscaping. However I worked with someone who lived there and she give me the impression that it’s a “real crime watch” and not safe to live in, like this article states. I do find it confusing because when I look up Oaks Estate on the internet I get different responses, telling me it’s ACT or NSW.

Give us a break, this is just the latest masterplan for Oaks Estate, after a long list of previous master plans released in 1983, 1991, 2001, 2014, and now 2025. All of these plans included extensive community consultation, and all of them promised improved community services. The problems at Oaks Estate will never be fixed until politicians acknowledge the cause of the problems, that Oaks Estate is geographically part of Queanbeyan and should be transferred to NSW.

The residents of Oaks Estate live between 1-2 kms from the Queanbeyan primary and high schools, the main street and supermarkets, the hospital and police station, and a Queanbeyan bus loops around the area Mon-Sat.

The residents of Oaks Estate need journalists to ask the current crop of politicians about the outcome of the previous 2014 master plan, and get them to explain why this 2025 plan will succeed when previous plans failed to deliver.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-23/master-plan-for-historic-oaks-estate-finally-released/5986018

I looked up Oaks Estate and Geographically it isn’t a part of Queanbeyan. It would be like saying ‘Geographically, Queanbeyan is a part of Canberra.’ However I can see your point, if so many plans failed to be completed it will most likely never happen.

Karl, Oaks Estate was a part of Queanbeyan all through the 1800s, and was only carved off the side of Queanbeyan and added to the ACT in 1911, when bureaucrats made a lazy error by simply drawing the border along the railway line instead of making a slight detour to follow the river so Oaks Estate would remain in Queanbeyan as before.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.