25 June 2025

Why do we expect the government to do everything for us?

| By Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
43
City Services Minister Chris Steel and Chief Minister Andrew Barr

City Services Minister Chris Steel and Chief Minister Andrew Barr have revealed a tough budget for 2025-26. Photo: Clare Fenwicke.

It’s ACT Budget week and it’s a tough one this year.

Treasurer Chris Steel announced a raft of new taxes and charges, intended to bring the government back into the black while keeping services afloat and attempting to do something about housing, health and other critical (and often long-running) issues.

Regardless of your opinion of their management skills, the ACT government is cash-strapped and pretty much always will be, no matter who is running it. The revenue base is small and many of the numbers will never add up.

But often, our expectation seems to be that government will fix everything. Everything that’s wrong is their fault, every need should be met by them – but without raising our taxes or charges.

“The government ought to do something about it”, goes the refrain in the comments section.

From time to time, people say to me “if you can raise enough money for a really strong community foundation, aren’t you letting government off the hook? It’s their job to fix our problems, isn’t it?”.

The answer is no – looking after the community is a responsibility that belongs to us all. Government is elected to represent our interests and to provide services, not to run our lives. While we tax income at relatively high levels, overall Australia’s tax to GDP rate is low by comparison with the rest of the OECD.

READ ALSO ‘Difficult decisions’: Steel prescribes health levy, tax rises to mend Budget

Unlike Scandinavian countries, Australians aren’t comfortable with high-taxing regimes that provide expensive but comprehensive social services. Unlike the US, we do expect the state to ensure there’s a safety net for the most vulnerable.

Together we form a social compact – essentially (in the words of the ACT Government itself), “community, business and government working together to deliver integrated responses that benefit all Canberrans”.

Honestly, we’re too small to have many other options. A wealthy community with high expectations is served by a chronically underfunded government with a budget smaller than some Sydney regions.

But there are many advantages to stepping up together as a community.

When we rely on government alone, we’re also tethered by its agenda and the high bar of expenditure required to satisfy Treasury bean counters. Private money can be faster and more flexible, government provides the heft and capacity.

In Queensland, the new Office of Social Impact was founded and funded by government and private money, a collaboration begun by philanthropist Allan English AM and the Queensland treasurer David Janetzki to explore exactly these opportunities.

The Office will drive the development of for-purpose and social enterprises across the state, looking for impact investing in collaboration with sector leaders, social entrepreneurs, philanthropic funders and investors.

READ ALSO ACT Budget: What your rates bill will be in 2025-26

The expectation is this will also help foster innovation and economic growth. Grants are just the start. The bigger, better outcome is when the community comes together to build skills, create jobs and fix underlying social issues, not just provide financial bandaids for the short term.

This week Hands Across Canberra, the Snow Foundation and the John James Foundation announced almost $2 million in grants, meeting need across the Canberra community from social inclusion to disability and poverty.

The funding is the highest total ever given away but it won’t touch the sides of all the need in the city – we had applications for $12 million worth of projects, all worthy and wanted by the not for profit sector.

Government has an obligation to each and every one of these people too, but none of us can do it alone. Charity can’t meet the need alone and government can’t either.

Instead we need to recognise partnerships across our small community and collaborate to create a better and fairer Canberra.

Genevieve Jacobs is the CEO of Hands Across Canberra.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

43
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

This is a joke isn’t it?
When you are massively in debt, do you spend a couple of billion on a rail service that doesn’t even match the bus service it replaced?
Of course not………..Whoops! We went and did it!
Rattenbury blackmailed the labor govt in to building it. He was then “rewarded” with the Treasury portfolio. He recently quit the front bench when he saw what a mess he’d created.
He would have been sacked years ago if he worked in private enterprise. Perhaps even jail time too.
Not in Canberra though.
I don’t expect our govt to do everything for me. However I do expect them to manage their budgets with the same care that I do at my home.

Labor government is trash

There are some many charities out there running on good will and volunteers who are doing this Genevieve – I don’t think your narrative is correct.

The idea that the government is and will always be “cash strapped” just doesn’t stand up to any form of scrutiny.

In the last decade, the government has massively increased revenue, well beyond inflation, yet still are in enormous deficit with only more to come.

And the main driver for this is unsustainable spending growth in discretional areas that do not give us value for money. The money is being wasted through bad management, bad planning and poor service delivery.

Youre right in that we shouldn’t expect the government to do everything for us, but they need to stop trying to expand their reach as well. They’ve lost any semblance of understanding what “essential services” actually means.

Smaller government ? Ditching vanity projects like the silly 8 minute $375 million battery in Holt would be a great start.

That’s you most sensible comment every chewy !

Capital Retro8:48 am 26 Jun 25

No scientific endorsement needed in that statement chewy.

Even I can understand it and I support it 100%.

I could have said it better though.

CR the ACT government could also save money in the health sector, specifically mental health by using chewy’s advanced psychiatric diagnosis skills to save time triaging patients.

Though he may need to brush up on the difference between neurological and cognitive issues.

Pengold PhD is hard at work i see.

Hypothesising that Co2 is both beneficial and harmful to plants within the same day.

All whilst at the same time diagnosing that cognitive impairment, is indeed, a cognitive issue.

What i can diagnose chewy is dyslexia, exemplified by your inability to spell my name correctly. It’s a neurological condition according to Dr Google.

Hey based on your sensible post above, will you join me in opposing the krazy big battery 🔋 plan ?

It’s almost as silly as a light rail in Canberra that can’t cope with the cold. ☃️

They could start by abolishing many of their useless woke, vanity projects like the ACT Human Rights Commission & focus on the basics like Health.

“the ACT government is cash-strapped and pretty much always will be, no matter who is running it. The revenue base is small and many of the numbers will never add up.”

Flat out wrong Genevieve – that’s lazy and apologist. Your ABC roots are showing. The ACT government’s finances were fine under the last Liberal government and under Stanhope, and we were getting better outcomes in the key areas of responsibility of health and education. Under Barr revenues have grown faster than inflation and population growth combined. Yet he has not delivered a single surplus and invented his own unique reporting framework to make the spending look less excessive. Management positions in the ACTPS have blown out and are creating worse outcomes. Barr has pursued bad capital spending in defiance of expert advice, despite the left of politics saying listen to the experts. Seemingly that only applies when the experts agree with them.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.