Why use one lane when you can use two?

CanberraCreative didn’t take this photo. The Magna is actually brand new and the photo was taken in 1990 from the Hubble Space Telescope – pre Magoo glasses. The Magna, though new, is still a piece os shit.

mr reason said :

Next time, a much sharper photo

AND you should get the horizon level.

thatsnotme said :

rhino said :

Why is riot act filled with people enraged at the tiniest of driving infractions. Usually ones that affect nobody else. I mean if someone double parked you in so you can’t get out, sure, post a photo and we can all hate on them. But if they are not really doing any harm to anyone or God forbid they exceed the speed limit by 10kph on a road works 40kph zone that would normally be 80kph! :O How dare they!

My point is, why are the biggest posters on here purely concerned with things that don’t matter? And whenever anyone complains that they have to drive around for 30 minutes looking for parking at ANU or something, they don’t care. That is an obvious inconvenience, whereas someone else briefly crossing a line on the road where nobody else is, is not an inconvenience.

That’s a nice rant and all, but did you actually read the responses this post received? Because if you had, you’d have seen that everyone else already agrees with you.

I did and I’m glad. Just had to express my observation. This is the first thread I think I have seen where that has been the case. I’m not too optimistic that other similar threads will get similar responses though.

rhino said :

Why is riot act filled with people enraged at the tiniest of driving infractions. Usually ones that affect nobody else. I mean if someone double parked you in so you can’t get out, sure, post a photo and we can all hate on them. But if they are not really doing any harm to anyone or God forbid they exceed the speed limit by 10kph on a road works 40kph zone that would normally be 80kph! :O How dare they!

My point is, why are the biggest posters on here purely concerned with things that don’t matter? And whenever anyone complains that they have to drive around for 30 minutes looking for parking at ANU or something, they don’t care. That is an obvious inconvenience, whereas someone else briefly crossing a line on the road where nobody else is, is not an inconvenience.

That’s a nice rant and all, but did you actually read the responses this post received? Because if you had, you’d have seen that everyone else already agrees with you.

BethiePrice said :

SkipDaRoo said :

Looks like you used two lens’ instead of one. Also if you took the photo from the drivers seat, you broke a bigger law than the numnut who could not stay between the lines.

+1

“LENSES”!!

SkipDaRoo said :

Looks like you used two lens’ instead of one. Also if you took the photo from the drivers seat, you broke a bigger law than the numnut who could not stay between the lines.

+1

Why is riot act filled with people enraged at the tiniest of driving infractions. Usually ones that affect nobody else. I mean if someone double parked you in so you can’t get out, sure, post a photo and we can all hate on them. But if they are not really doing any harm to anyone or God forbid they exceed the speed limit by 10kph on a road works 40kph zone that would normally be 80kph! :O How dare they!

My point is, why are the biggest posters on here purely concerned with things that don’t matter? And whenever anyone complains that they have to drive around for 30 minutes looking for parking at ANU or something, they don’t care. That is an obvious inconvenience, whereas someone else briefly crossing a line on the road where nobody else is, is not an inconvenience.

Gripping stuff.

Now where did I leave my 3D glasses…

Looks like you used two lens’ instead of one. Also if you took the photo from the drivers seat, you broke a bigger law than the numnut who could not stay between the lines.