18 June 2025

Work to start on Canberra’s first light rail bridge

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
88

What the light rail bridge over Parkes Way will look like. Image: Infrastructure Canberra.

The construction of light rail Stage 2A is about to ramp up, with work set to begin on Canberra’s first light rail bridge, a major milestone in connecting the city to Commonwealth Park and the Acton Waterfront.

The work will also mean Parkes Way will need to be closed for a time in the last week of June and possibly the first week of July. More closures can be expected later in the year.

Infrastructure Canberra says the new rail bridge will span Parkes Way between the existing Commonwealth Avenue road bridges.

It has been designed to carry two fully loaded light rail vehicles simultaneously – the equivalent of approximately 70 cars.

READ ALSO Acton Waterfront’s temporary park complete but Ngamawari not far away

Bridge piling works for the foundations will begin in late June, paving the way for the installation of massive steel girder frames later in the year.

This will require the deployment of an 800-tonne crane stationed in the Parkes Way median, which Infrastructure Canberra says will be a significant engineering feat.

To ensure piling works can be undertaken safely, Parkes Way will be closed under Commonwealth Avenue in both directions between Coranderrk Street and the Glenloch Interchange from 8 pm on Friday, 27 June, until 5 am on Monday, 30 June, and possibly from 8 pm on Friday, 4 July, until 5 am on Monday, 7 July.

Infrastructure Canberra said traffic controls and signage will be put in place to safely direct motorists along alternative routes.

Eastbound traffic will be directed along either Caswell Drive or Lady Denman Drive, while westbound traffic will be diverted across Commonwealth Avenue.

Infrastructure Canberra said works have been scheduled to take place over weekends to minimise the impact on Canberra’s road network. Public transport may experience some delays during these works.

Additional road closures will be necessary in the coming months as construction on the light rail project continues.

The community will be notified in advance about any potential impacts and traffic changes.

The new bridge will be the first of several on the way to Woden, including the major crossing across Lake Burley Griffin in Stage 2B, then across State Circle, Hopetoun Circuit and Yarralumla Creek.

READ ALSO Barr opts for PPP to deliver Canberra Convention and Entertainment Precinct

Construction on Stage 2A started in February as the Raising London Circuit project neared completion. It is expected to take two years to build the 1.7 km long extension, with a further year of testing and commissioning before services commence in 2028.

Construction on light rail Stage 2B, Commonwealth Park to Woden, is expected to start in 2028 following the completion of Stage 2A, with the entire light rail to Woden project to be completed in 2033.

To learn more about road changes and other impacts of the construction of light rail, visit Built for CBR.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

88
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

It’s amazing the speed of approvals and red tape in the centre of the universe. Those on a different planet in Belconnen out Tuggeranong seem to have our approvals take decades.

As one who lives in the southern outpost of the People’s Republic of the ACT, who rarely has a need to travel to Woden, and even less reason to travel to Civic and beyond, all this discourse on light rail beyond civic is just so much blah, blah, blah. Occasionally the conversation is elevated to rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb.

Leon Arundell1:28 pm 19 Jun 25

I am getting used to claims, by people like Jack D, who accuse me of making “less than truthful claims about light rail” that come direct from ACT Government publications. If people don’t like those claims, they should take their issues up with the government (or at least do their own research) instead of posting defamatory comments about me.

I got all excited when I saw this article but when I read it I was disappointed, I didn’t see any mention of the light rail reaching Woden or indication of when that’s planned to be finished. The light rail is a nice addition to Canberra but I’ve not had a reason to use it.

The light rail to Woden will probably be ready in 9 years. The environmental impact assessment consultation starts in July. Exciting.

His plans were ignored from the start.But for what it’s worth, he did envision trams and railway running into the city.

https://www.be.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/schools_and_engagement/resources/_notes/5A4_2.pdf

It goes to show that tram was last-century technology. There’s smarter way to address the public transport problem we are facing today using modern day technology.

Walter Burley Griffin’s plans for the capital city won an international design competition. What competotion was won for those plans to be torn up with such scant regard for the layout and heritage qualities of the Capitol? The buses employ more people, and don’t need expensive infrastructure violating the WB-G Plan.

His plans were ignored from the start.But for what it’s worth, he did envision trams and railway running into the city.

https://www.be.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/schools_and_engagement/resources/_notes/5A4_2.pdf

Their was a display of Walter Burly Griffin’s original design plans for Canberra on display at the NCA. I like what we have today but his original plans looks a lot nicer. From memory, Parliament House was meant to be where EPIC is and EPIC was ment to be at Parliament Hill. But his plans were rejected because they looked “too European, like Venice.” They did look that way but that’s what I liked about it.

HiddenDragon8:52 pm 18 Jun 25

“The new bridge will be the first of several on the way to Woden, including the major crossing across Lake Burley Griffin in Stage 2B, then across State Circle, Hopetoun Circuit and Yarralumla Creek.”

None of which will happen without a substantial financial contribution from the federal government which, in spite of the exciting news of these lovely little cuddle sessions –

https://region.com.au/two-tiers-of-government-vow-to-work-together-to-prioritise-canberra-projects/878809/

clearly has much more pressing fiscal priorities and problems (admitted to in today’s Dance of the 7.7 – incl. GST – Veils at the Press Club) to deal with than a discretionary infrastructure project in a town where the Liberals are in no way a threat to Labor dominance.

Leon Arundell2:31 pm 18 Jun 25

Why does the government persist with its trolley folly? It concluded that bus rapid transit stage 1 would produce almost identical benefits to light rail, at half the cost. It kept its analysis of light rail stage 2 for seven years, until last month. It found that, compared with keeping Adelaide Avenues transit lanes, light rail to Woden would cost an extra $billion, would offer net benefits of minus half a $billion, and would cut public transport patronage across the whole territory by 2% to 10%. This presents a conundrum for rabidly pro-tram organisations like PTCBR and the government-funded Conservation Council. In a Trumpian move, the Conservation Council expelled me from its transport working group and banned me from its premises because I had openly advocated for bus rapid transit and electric buses. Then it elected PTCBR committee member Damien Hass to its board, after Haas misled the Council by telling it that the government had concluded that light rail would generate a better overall outcome for Canberra.

Leon, a bus rapid transit may initially be cheaper but not over the 100 year lifetime, or even 30 years. People have voted with their feet. The current limited tram transports over 20 % of our public transport already. Heavily patronised day and night.

Rob,
The lifecycle costs are included in economic assessments so your point is incorrect.

And why is 20% of public transport some magic number showing viability?

Particularly when the public transport services to other areas of Canberra have been reduced or cut in recent years and bus services in Gungahlin were redirected to feed the light rail.

And that’s not even starting on the fact that Light Rail patronage is significantly lower than the forecasts included in the business case for the project in the first place.

20% because the cut bus services elsewhere to pay for it.

The tram is a useless waste of money. It’s like proposing a 8 hour tram to Sydney.

I wasn’t going to comment on Leon Arundell’s comment above which has made my day and I think is absolutely hilarious. Thank goodness for advocacy groups like the Conservation Council and the PTCBR for their ongoing commitments to Canberra and our city’s future public transport needs. Why would these committed and hard-working advocates for the betterment of Canberra’s future welcome crusty old codgers hell bent on undermining their work?

Leon is twisting words again to suit his rabid anti-rail advocacy. The government has never made any of the claims he makes and much of what he says just doesn’t make sense. The funding contributions for light rail will come from the federal and ACT governments but Leon knows that. The Conservation Council is a non-profit, non-government organisation and not government funded as Mr Arundell claims. The council relies on public donations and funding from the government and this information is freely available on the council’s website. Congratulations to Damien Haas on his election to the Council board. His unrelenting commitment and advocacy for public transport and light rail in the ACT is to be commended.

Chewy14 continues his word games and nitpicking below. His rabid anti-rail tirades directing his spleen towards me are wearing thin. Chewy knows that the NCA has not granted any planning approvals for light rail through the parliamentary triangle to Woden. He is also aware that the NCA’s decisions are integral to the extension of light rail to Woden with significant environmental, heritage and ecological considerations.

Jack D,
Just making stuff up again because he has not read or does not understand the information contained within the government’s own documentation on the project.

Which is why it’s easy for Jack D to support such an enormous waste of public funds to provide little public benefit, whilst at the same time still supporting the enrichment of private landholders and developers out of that public funding.

Leon’s claims are sourced directly from ACT Government documents, so yes that is exactly what the ACT Government is saying about the benefits of the project. Jack’s cognitive dissonance on the project viability doesn’t change that.

“Chewy knows that the NCA has not granted any planning approvals for light rail through the parliamentary triangle to Woden.”

Where have I claimed anything like this?

You claimed that the NCA is to blame for delays to the approvals to the project and the ACT Government is “negotiating” with them.

Neither of these claims are true.

It’s akin to claiming ACTPLA is delaying the construction of a new house because a development proponent hasn’t yet submitted compliant plans/applications.

It is up to the ACT Government to progress planning for the project including the required studies for environmental and heritage impacts.

This is in the sole control of the ACT Government. The reason they haven’t prioritised this work and resourced it, is obvious to anyone with the most basic knowledge of the project.

Why dont you try actually responding to the comprehensive points made around the viability of the project rather than whataboutisms and address hominems?

This looks good. I can’t wait for the NCA to pull their fingers out and give ACT residents some certainty on the extension and likely route of light rail to Woden.
Just a side note though, where has the bike lane disappeared to on Commonwealth Ave connecting the off ramp on Parkes Way?

The NCA isn’t in charge of the ACT Government’s planning or progress on future stages of light rail.

Maybe you should read the recently released business case documents for the second stage of light rail to see the real reasons for the delay.

Reasons that have only increased since those documents were written.

I have read the business case chewy14. It is about time you got used to light rail instead of your mind numbingly and constant criticisms of it. If you had read the business case yourself you would have informed yourself of the significant and complex environmental obstacles and legislative hurdles presented by a light rail network traversing through the parliamentary triangle. This means the government negotiating outcomes with the NCA to comply with these requirements for the good of the project for it to proceed.

You should try chilling out Chewy14. Gungahlin residents have embraced light rail as publicly released stats reveal. These stats are freely available online.

Canberrans have voted for light rail at the last four elections.

Get over it!

Jack,
As below, you clearly haven’t read the business cases or supporting documentation if you dont understand the approvals pathways or the woeful economic assessments that show the project isn’t viable.

The government doesn’t need to “negotiate” with the NCA, they are about proponent for which the NCA is the planning authority, which has a well defined approvals pathway which has not changed.

The only delay is caused because of the enormous cost and unaffordability of the project, which is why the government is giving it the go slow. Along with trying to lobby the Feds to fund it outside of normal Infrastructure assessment processes.

The recently released business case showed Stage 2 has a cost benefit ratio of 0.4 with almost non existent transport benefits.

And the cost of similar projects have significantly increased since the document was written making even that pitiful return unlikely.

“Gungahlin residents have embraced light rail as publicly released stats reveal. These stats are freely available online.”

Oh you mean the stats that I’ve previously presented to you that show the Stage 1 route is not even coming close to the forecast 2021 patronage figures included in the Stage 1 business case?

Im wondering what type of “embrace” you think not coming close too meeting targets is? A weak handshake?

“Canberrans have voted for light rail at the last four elections.”

Perhaps you can provide the ballot papers where we voted on that? Particularly when the Liberals also supported light rail at the 2020 election and actually lost votes.

Or that the Woden area had significantly higher Liberal and Independent votes in 2024 despite being the apparent beneficiaries for Stage 2B.

Why would I “get over” pointing out the facts about the project. Such a strange response.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.