6 August 2025

Social cohesion is more important than free speech, says visa-denying Minister

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
73
Tony Burke

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has personally denied visas for foreign hate mongers wanting to come to Australia. Photo: Facebook.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke says he couldn’t care less about freedom of speech when it comes to his role in stopping hatred being imported to Australia.

He has denied dozens of Australian visas being granted to foreign applicants because of media and online comments they have made which, he says, are designed to undermine social cohesion.

In an interview with The Australian Financial Review, Mr Burke outlined how he has directed his department to prioritise social cohesion over freedom of speech when assessing visa applications.

The same applies when consideration is being given to whether visas should be cancelled.

The Minister, who was given the Home Affairs portfolio in July 2024, acknowledged that his approach might be different to some of his predecessors.

“There’s traditionally been a large number of people where the power to refuse was clearly there and in the name of freedom of speech, Ministers have said, ‘Oh no, let them in’,” he said in the interview.

“I could not care less about the freedom of speech argument if I’m in the business of stopping hatred from being imported to Australia.”

Mr Burke said immigration was ultimately a decision about who to let into Australia and who to deny that privilege.

If someone intends to disrupt social cohesion, he said, then “I don’t want them here”.

READ ALSO Pressure on PM to recognise Palestine as soon as possible

There have been about 100 visa applicants refused or cancelled since he became Minister, with a number denied by his personal intervention.

American rapper Kanye West’s visa was blocked under the new visa regime after he released his song Heil Hitler.

Some right-wing Israeli speakers have also had their visa applications denied.

One high-profile former Israeli politician denied was Ayelet Shaked, over a strongly worded 2014 social media statement she made (citing one of her ministerial briefings), in which she referred to the children of terrorists as “little snakes” who had to go.

Mr Burke said, “There was no way” he would allow her to come to Australia.

“If someone wanted to come to Australia for a public speaking event, and they were on the record describing Jewish children as reptiles, would I let them in?” he said.

“The answer was no,” he said.

Liberal Party frontbencher and former Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson expressed concern over the Minister’s candid revelations.

He suggested Mr Burke had not always been consistent and that not everyone was being held to the same standards.

“I’m cautious because what it does is empower the Minister,” Mr Wilson told Nine’s Today show.

“You need to make sure that there are clear guidelines that are broadly, equally applicable.

“If people are going to advocate for harm against Australians, the standard should be consistent, not based on what the Minister simply decides based on the whim of the day or his political considerations.”

READ ALSO AUKUS has seen a spike in high-level foreign espionage activity in Australia, ASIO boss says

Mr Wilson said when the Coalition was in office in 2018, Mr Burke had “advocated for a visa for somebody who believed in the enslavement and the punishment of homosexuals and the subjugation of women”.

Mr Wilson was referring to a business visa application for an Islamic extremist.

But Mr Burke denied the suggestion, saying he was “really surprised” Mr Wilson would make that accusation on commercial television.

The Minister told the ABC that he never advocated for that hate preacher to be granted a visa.

“To claim that I did would be untrue and defamatory,” Mr Burke said.

“It’s wrong. It was wrong then, and I’m not sure if he’s just being reckless, making things up, or lying.

“But if he reckons there’s a letter of me doing that, he should provide it. Because there’s not.”

Mr Burke also insisted that the directive to his department was in accordance with a principle enshrined in legislation allowing him to go down that path to deny visas.

“It’s up to the Minister whether you want to use it or not, but if you think someone’s going to incite discord, you can refuse their visa, or cancel their visa,” he said.

“And for me, you know, when you talk about all the different hatreds that are around the world, there’s one thing that people keep saying, which is they don’t want hatred imported here …

“If someone has got a record of just trying to blow issues up and turn people against each other, we don’t need them here.

“I’m really relaxed about saying to someone who wants to come here, incite discord and spread hatred, ‘You can go to another country, we don’t need it here. ’”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

73
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
CaptainSpiff11:20 am 07 Aug 25

This is an IQ test for lefties.

For anyone struggling to understand, imagine a party or leader you despise is in power, and starts canceling visas based on something they call “social cohesion”.

This stuff isn’t hard, unless you are ideologically blinded.

This is an IQ test for the far right.

For anyone struggling to understand, imagine a party or leader you love is in power, and refuses to cancel visas of avowed Nazis.

This stuff isn’t hard, unless you are ideologically blinded.

CaptainSpiff1:56 pm 07 Aug 25

Based on “social cohesion” the minister can unilaterally cancel anyone he wants. All he needs for cover is for the media to throw a few “controversial” or “hateful” labels. You can see that right?

You mean labels like Nazi?

The Minister has always been able to cancel visas….this is not new champion. Free speech doesn’t come with a platform, freedom from consequences or a visa.

You just don’t like it when you support the vile people who are being sensibly excluded.

The problem with your argument is that the left hates science. Posting of scientific facts can get you arrested in the UK. Is that what you want seano to ban science?

“The problem with your argument is that the left hates science”

LMAO…none of that is true Henry, silly but definitely not true.

Since the 90s, we’ve known that “diversity” is corrosive to social cohesion (Putnam’s Bowling Alone). If the government actually cared about that, it wouldn’t have such high migration without assimilation, particularly of different groups who cannot live next to each other in peace.

What rubbish! Diversity is essential to survival of all species offering capabilities that cannot be achieved through conformity. It is all about understanding people who are different from oneself and seeing the benefits they offer, rather than forcing them to fit in. Forced conformity is corrosive to ongoing development of all societies.

That’s rubbish.

A living things adaptability is the only thing that matters. If it can’t change it dies out.

psycho you should tell that to some of the left-leaning commentators here, who’s tolerance of different opinions might best be described as “challenging”.

Oh we tolerate differing opinions Penfold, it’s not our fault that you fundamentally don’t understand free speech (or anything).

Your free speech is not impinged by having dumb arguments ripped to shreds.

Like yesterday’s mathematics howler ? 🤣

Explain how people on disability support and people with a disability are the same thing Henry? Here’s a tip, try it using a Venn diagram. lol

But thanks for providing my point, again…I don’t even have to pay attention to tear your dumb arguments to shreds, but hasn’t stopped you demonstrating that you also don’t understand free speech.

“howler”….lol sure.

Stephen Saunders11:33 am 06 Aug 25

100 applications refused, and 2.5 million approved.

So then not a free speech issue.

It does not surprise that you would against even people visiting Australia on visas….it not hard to guess why.

“Free speech” doesn’t guarantee either a platform or a visa. Just because someone can say something doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences.

Yet 100,000 hate preachers are allowed to walk across Sydney Harbour Bridge. Such consistency.

Peaceful protesters. Why do you hate free speech Penfold?

Capital Retro10:32 am 06 Aug 25

I reckon there were only about 30,000. Some were going around a few times to make it look good.

I thought I saw a couple of zombies too but the missus said “clean your glasses, that’s Julian Assange and Bob Carr”

Zombies, drones, greens, all the usual peace lovers.

Apparently there was plenty of chanting “death, death to the IDF”. Such humanitarians.

Presumably Bob Carr was there representing Beijing and Jules, Ecuador. Who was the green representing ?

Heywood Smith11:07 am 06 Aug 25

Seano… Peaceful perhaps, but burning the Australian Flag wasnt necessary.

“Why do you hate free speech Penfold?” Pot calling

“Seano… Peaceful perhaps, but burning the Australian Flag wasnt necessary.”

A literal expression of free speech that I don’t personally agree with but why do you hate free speech?

@Futureproof “Pot calling”.

Justify this comment. We both know you won’t.

Capital Retro12:13 pm 06 Aug 25

The Green certainly wasn’t representing the environment, Penfold.

Are you sure, Capital Retro? Have you checked out the Gazan environment lately?

Futureproof – it’s hardly worth the effort. As you can tell, self-awareness isn’t a strong suit when he asks you to explain. Nor is his maths.

CR – clearly. Besides which the keffiyeh is black and white, no green anywhere near it.

Of course Futureproof can’t justify the comment and being so very brave, Penfold confirms the same thing. lol

Oh my goodness, you read and believe the untruthful right wing media! There was no hate promoted at this march. It was beautifully peaceful with the focus on humanity, unlike the publications that promote hate by lying about what actually happened.

Sure psycho, and October 7 never happened either.

Speaking of lying publications, did you see the NYT shocker about the supposedly “malnourished” baby ? Can’t get much lower than that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/world/middleeast/gaza-starvation.html

The NY Times issued a correction. How does that prove that there isn’t a humanitarian crisis in Gaza?

Are you going to issue a correction for incompetence about basic maths ?

What it proves, since it has to be explained, is that the left wing media will lie to fit their agenda. Now about climate change 🙂

Another puerile Penfold response.

How does the NY issuing a correcting prove there’s no humanitarian crisis in Gaza?

You made the claim have the courage to back it up or at admit it doesn’t.

Capital Retro6:23 pm 06 Aug 25

No, I haven’t and neither have you so your point is?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.