29 August 2025

Winter's last gasp as cold front hits ACT and NSW

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
28
Parliament House in windy stormy conditions

Expect the cold, wet and windy weather to continue over the weekend. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Southeast NSW will be lashed with damaging winds today, as a “vigorous cold front” moves in across the state.

The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) has issued a severe weather warning for the ACT, South Coast, Snowy Mountains, Southern Tablelands, and South West Slopes, and parts of the Illawarra.

Winds are expected to hit around 100 km/h in some places, while the possibility of snow drops down to 700 metres as temperatures also plummet.

BOM senior meteorologist Miriam Bradbury says “a vigorous cold front is moving across southeast Australia on Friday, bringing very cold and very windy conditions”.

“Those strong to locally damaging winds will extend across southern and southeast South Australia, possibly becoming destructive around those southern coastal areas.”

READ ALSO Think the wattle’s making you sneeze? Think again (your real enemy is most likely invisible)

Overnight, showers and isolated thunderstorms drifted across the south, bringing 15 to 40 millimetres of rain to gauges in NSW, mainly on the southeast ranges.

Perisher received up to 42 mm alone, combined with wind gusts of up to 93 km/h. Closer to the coast, winds reached 100 km/h in Nowra and 101 km/h in Moss Vale.

Ms Bradbury says today will continue the theme, with damaging winds – to the point of blizzards for areas around 1200 metres in elevation – likely across the Snowy Mountains, Brindabellas, and Central Tablelands.

The snow level will also drop down to 700 metres for NSW, with “some flurries” possible for the ACT too. A hazardous surf warning is likely to be issued for most of the NSW coastline for Saturday.

The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service recommends postponing travel to the back country, including Goulburn, Nowra, Cooma, Braidwood, Nerriga, Araluen, Captain’s Flat, Thredbo Top Station, and Mount Ginini.

Snowy Mountains road

NSW National Parks recommends avoiding travel into the back country. Photo: Dave Coleman.

ACT Policing have also warned motorists that officers will be “actively patrolling rural areas” over the weekend to enforce safe driving.

“With poor weather and possible snow this weekend, ACT Policing is reminding Canberrans to exercise caution if heading into the mountains,” a statement reads.

“Motorists are reminded to slow down and drive to the conditions, particularly when visibility is low, or in traffic.

“We also advise that sedans, two-wheel drives and all-wheel drives (AWDs) should not be driven off bitumen in rural areas if dirt roads are wet or snow-covered.

“Campers and bushwalkers in rural and remote areas should postpone their activities if not properly equipped for cold, wet and windy weather, including blizzard conditions.

“Bushwalkers should also carry a personal locator beacon, and notify someone of where they are going and when they are expected to return.”

The rest of Friday is expected to be cloudy in Canberra, with between 5 and 15 mm of rain expected into the afternoon and evening and winds reaching up to 40 km/h. The temperature will max out at 14 degrees Celsius.

Saturday will start with a frost and reach a high of 13 degrees, with up to 2 mm of showers expected in the early morning.

The warmth will return on Sunday, when temperatures climb back up to 17 degrees and continue to rise through to an expected 20 degrees on Tuesday.

In the meantime, the State Emergency Service (SES) advises that people should:

  • Move vehicles under cover or away from trees to protect them from damage.
  • Secure or put away loose items around your house, yard and balcony.
  • Keep at least 8 metres away from fallen power lines or objects that may be energised, such as fences.
  • Be aware that trees damaged by fire are likely to be more unstable and prone to falling.
  • Report fallen power lines to either Ausgrid (131 388), Endeavour Energy (131 003), Essential Energy (132 080) or Evoenergy (131 093) as shown on your power bill.
  • Stay vigilant and monitor conditions (noting that the landscape may have changed following bushfires).

For emergency help in floods and storms, ring your local SES Unit on 132 500.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Just wondering if Penfold & Future proof ignore the experts in other areas of life ?

Do you scoff when your mechanic says your brakes need replacing or the GP suggests you have that mole checked.

Just wondering how you work out which experts to believe & which to ignore.

Wrong analogy franky. The trick is to work out who the experts are and who aren’t.

Capital Retro8:54 pm 29 Aug 25

You can see worn brakes and angry moles but you can’t see climate change.

What experts Franky? See my reply to Chewy below

“Wrong analogy franky. The trick is to work out who the experts are and who aren’t.”

Yes that is imperative.

Why are you so bad at it then?

Correction, Capital Retro: you can’t see climate change. Not seeing, hearing or understanding is what happens when you keep your brain closed.

Have you ever had a pathology test? On what basis did you believe any of the data, given you were unable to see molecules in your body? What makes you think X-rays or MRI scans show any reality at all? Did you check the brakes and engines on the aircraft before your last commercial flight?

What is your basis for defining experts or expertise Penfold, other than whether they conform with your political views?

Well Axon experts are the ones who report and support scientific evidence. Hint: the ones who want to diddle with evidence aren’t experts.

So once again let me reiterate that the climate is changing (as it always has) and science tells us man makes CO2 emissions higher. And CO2 is a greenhouse gas with warming properties.

But that doesn’t mean we need to act with hysteria. Science also tells us that no “expert” knows the relationship between CO2 and temperature with any certainty. The IPCC need half a dozen “scenarios” in each AR report to desperately reach for conclusion, yet demand we spend squillions on it.

That’s not science. It’s ideology.

“But that doesn’t mean we need to act with hysteria”

So you should probably not be so hysterical Penzero in ignoring the clear evidence.

“That’s not science. It’s ideology”

Yes, thats exactly what your comments are Penzero. Ignoring reality because it doesn’t fit your world view.

You are the antithesis of Science.

Science, by its very nature, has no “antithesis”. But thanks for the chuckle chewy.

When living in a world so black and white, does one ever see grey ? 🙂

Fail, Penfold.

Obviously experts report their best evidence without falsehood. No brainer. However, your reply merely added indirection to my question without answering it.

So, what is scientific evidence? How does an expert become qualified?

Don’t bother repeating your blather of truisms. Answer the question so we can distinguish what is evidence and what is not, what qualifies experts and what does not, without your rigid nescience.

CaptainSpiff1:58 pm 31 Aug 25

You really just have to chuckle Penfold. Mildest truths will set the cultists off.

Sounds like you must be well capable of answering the questions which Capital Retro and Penfold avoid, CaptainSpiff. Go ahead.

I did try to provide you a detailed response Axon, though it was met with displeasure by the mods.

In lieu of that, perhaps type “scientific evidence” into your preferred search engine.

Captain, likewise.

I have no need to search for that which I already understand far better than you, Penfold. None of you, Capital Retro or CaptainSpiff prove able to answer.

Well why ask the question if you claim to know the answer ?

Though I did use two opposite examples – Peter Ridd versus Tim Flannery.

None of that appears here, nor does it sound likely it addressed my questions, which I quote again for your convenience:
What is your basis for defining experts or expertise Penfold, other than whether they conform with your political views?
What qualifies experts and what does not?

Truisms about “they use evidence” is merely indirection. Spiff and Retro have vanished so it is up to you. Do try to avoid the mouldy cherries.

From Penfold: “Science, by its very nature, has no “antithesis”.” Wow – how to demonstrate you don’t understand science. Our base of human knowledge is built on the scientific examination of thesis and antithesis. That is the fundamental underpinning of science.

Well Axon I answered that directly, see above. It sounds like you didn’t like the answer. Can’t help you much further on that front, sorry.

DJA – you’re quite right – scientific examination is built on that. Science is not.

Ask yourself this – what’s the opposite of Science ?

(and yes, one awaits the school yard responses from the usual suspects 🚸)

Snow on Black Mountain today ? Blizzards ? It might be winter’s last gasp but probably not 2025’s last cold gasp.

Coldest winter in years, probably. Coldest June in 60 years, definitely.

https://region.com.au/canberrans-shiver-through-a-record-breaking-june-with-more-chilly-days-on-the-way/882396/

Indeed FP, and those years are nicely covered by the “BOM temperature homogenisation years”.

https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.95

The ABC really should stay away from weather predictions. Whenever it’s hot they claim it’s climate change. Whenever it’s cold, crickets ….

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-29/weather-winter-storm-snow-antarctic-blast-arrives/105708844

Penzero and Futureproof really should stay away from weather predictions. Whenever it’s cold they claim climate change isnt real, Whenever it’s hot, crickets

😂😂😂👨‍🦯👨‍🦯👨‍🦯

Oscar Wilde once said “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay”.

Penfold, what has a review of long term data sets published in 2020 to do with BOM’s 2025 seasonal Winter prediction? If it turns out we have above average rainfall this Spring, will you volunteer praise? Jerking knees bumped into your jaw again?

Here is your chance to display your ignorance of meteorology and climate once more.

What weather predictions, Chewy? A link from the partisan ABC and live feeds from the snow fields. One was fantasy, the other is real-time

You and Pengold only posting when you see something that supports your predetermined position Futureproof.

No wonder you understand fantasy, your posts are full of it.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.