18 September 2025

Mystery still derailing Canberra-Sydney express tilt train plan 30 years on

| By Nicholas Ward
Join the conversation
35
An X2000 travelling in Sweden

The Swedish X2000 tilt train spent two months in NSW and cut the journey time between Canberra and Sydney by an hour. Photo: SJ.

In 2017, MP Andrew Leigh dropped a bombshell: Canberra had had enough of the slow train to Sydney. His pitch: trial a tilt train provided for free by Spanish company Talgo.

Dr Leigh said Talgo believed its trains operating on existing tracks could cut the route from 4.5 to 2.5 hours.

It might have sounded like hype, but it had actually been tested before.

Thirty years ago, Canberra trialled the Swedish X2000 tilt train for two months – and it reduced travel times by an hour.

So what happened and why is the Canberra to Sydney tilt train plan still a mystery?

Tilt trains started their journey in Europe during the high-speed rail boom of the 1970s.

But for large mountainous countries such as Sweden, the issue with high-speed rail then was the same as today – it was expensive.

It needed specialised tracks, elevated, angled, and electrified to accommodate custom-built locomotives.

Many nations already had huge amounts of existing rail infrastructure. The problem with running a fast train on this wasn’t the speed; it was the corners.

The tilt mechanism lets a train go around a bend at an angle – like a motorcyclist rounding a corner – allowing it to go faster without special tracks.

tilt train graphic

Anyone who has ridden the Canberra to Sydney train knows it barely cracks walking speed through Molonglo Gorge. Photo: NSW David Folgin.

The technology was a hit for countries that wanted faster rail without the hassle of specialised infrastructure, including Sweden, which began designing its own in 1969.

In 1990, Sweden’s state railway Statens Järnvägar introduced the X2000, its first high-speed train, at a fraction of the cost of comparable high-speed rail systems.

The success of the train caught the attention of then NSW Premier John Fahey, who paid $8 million to bring out three carriages for a 10-month trial with CountryLink NSW.

On 23 April 1995 at 6:45 am, an X2000 driver trailer, a bistro, and a First Class car left Sydney Central Station and arrived in Canberra three-and-a-half hours later, an hour faster than the normal train of the day.

The trial ran for seven weeks. After Canberra, the trains ran a 95,000 km tour of NSW from Byron Bay to Broken Hill.

freight rail map tilt train 1995

The X2000 cost $49.80 for first class, $74.70 for premium. It advertised passengers could use laptops, send faxes, and even make mobile telephone calls on board. Photo: David Folgin.

It seemed like a total success: 10 – 25 per cent travel time reduction, no infrastructure upgrades, and a rollout of just four to five years.

The estimated cost for a total replacement of NSW’s CountryLink fleet: $250 million (about $500 million today).

But a fleet of X2000 was not to be.

Three years after the trial, the NSW Standing Committee on Public Works recommended against buying the trains.

The reason: state rail lines were in too poor a condition to take full advantage of them, but the report offered a silver lining.

“Fast train options, therefore, should be discounted until rail infrastructure has been upgraded to a standard where optimal travel times can be achieved,” committee chairman Paul Crittenden stated at the time.

Upgrading NSW tracks wasn’t going to be cheap, but it wasn’t impossible.

The estimate for achieving a 2.5-hour journey between Canberra to Sydney with tilt trains, $500 million.

But NSW was already locked in a battle with the federal government over rail infrastructure funding.

“The responsibility for achieving the goal of better track quality is largely in the hands of the Commonwealth Government,” Mr Crittenden stated in the report.

NSW wanted rail to be treated like interstate highways and receive Commonwealth funds. But the Howard federal government had a different idea.

In 1998, it unveiled a $3.4 billion plan for Speed Rail, a dedicated high-speed train between Sydney and Canberra that would cut journey times to 75 minutes.

The proposal scuppered any last hopes for the tilt train and NSW opted to instead refurbish its existing fleet.

Speed Rail was abandoned in 2002 and the Canberra to Sydney line is slower today than it was in 1995.

READ ALSO Outrage over Labor’s plan to start charging for FoI requests

The idea of the tilt train drifted out of public consciousness until 2017, when MP for Fenner Dr Leigh took up the torch.

He said he had met with representatives of Talgo, one of the world’s pre-eminent train manufacturers, which would bring a state-of-the-art tilt train to Canberra for free to prove it could work.

“We’d all love a high-speed rail line, which would upgrade the track and reduce the journey time to an hour or so. But if that isn’t feasible, then we shouldn’t let the perfect become the enemy of the good,” Dr Leigh said in 2017.

He called it a unique and valuable opportunity for the then Liberal government. He said if successful, the service could be rolled out in a few years.

Three years later, Labor won federal government. And in 2023, like every government since 1984, it announced another high-speed rail project.

What happened to the Talgo tilt train offer is a mystery.

Region contacted Dr Leigh, but he declined to comment.

Talgo was also contacted for comment. It did not respond.

Transport NSW, the Department of Infrastructure, and Infrastructure Australia were also contacted. They did not have records of any proposals.

Meanwhile, the X2000 continues to operate in Sweden between Stockholm, Gothenburg and Copenhagen.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Philip LAIRD7:32 am 17 Sep 25

The Queensland electric tilt train has been happily moving between Brisbane and Rockhampton since 1998 at speeds up to 160 km/h on tracks upgraded for larger and faster freight trains. In 2002 Western Australia and in 2006 Victoria got trains on upgraded tracks moving at 160 km/h.
We should have this in NSW and between Sydney and Canberra. Also more trains. Like between Toronto and Ottawa, 9 return trains each week day (moving fast too).
Also in 1998, a Speedrail consortium of Alstom and Leightons, with encouragement from the Howard Government, was spending in the order of $25m in a detailed design of existing rail from Central to Macarthur, than High Speed Rail on new tracks to Canberra airport to take just 84 minutes. Speedrail had also lined up credit of about $3.5 billion, there was a shortfall of about $1 billion that the Howard government would not fund. Not helped by NSW Govt saying it would put no money towards the worthwhile project.
In 1995, NSW State Rail authority engaged consultants for a Canberra High Speed Rail project to include a new route from Menangle to near Mittagong (along one side of the freeway that was opened in 1980). Perhaps a job for the new High Speed Rail (HSR) Authority.
Meantime we await release of the business case for Sydney Newcastle HSR proposal prepared in 2024.

I didn’t realise Canberra trains take so long to get to Sydney. I mean, my family would take 4hrs drive depending on which route, sometimes it’s 3hrs but 4.5hrs by train!? The whole appeal to a train is it should be quicker than by road because you don’t have to deal with traffic so much and it can maintain speed. There’s the luxury of being able to stand up and move about but….that’s not enough to convince me to ride a train to Sydney.

We should have another look at this

I dunno’, looking at the sketch the idea of tipping at that angle doesn’t appeal to me. I know airplanes tilt but still….for me the whole advantage to ridding a train is you get to your destination in comfort, able to sit at a table to eat and drink, able to move around….

Tilt trains are proven technology Karl, in place in many parts of the world. It doesn’t preclude people from moving around, from doing other things onboard etc – they are all built now to cater for that aspect and account for it in design.

Tje only people who use the train are pensioners and other retirees, and families on holiday. Not time sensitive. It beats driving. One can walk around, have a snack, use the toilet. Not even wkrth the ‘bargain basement’ price.

A true HST on this hilly terrain and escarpment down to Sydney would be eye wateringly expensive, and cost several billions. On the plus side it would take traffic off airlines, so airline level fares could be charged. But that would cut out its present users and force them onto busses.

You forgot to mention “passengers who have a fear of flying like to use the train.”

Sadly the Governments of this country have no foresight – that comment made irrespective of brand of government, or local/state/federal.

If they did, then we’d have a genuine plan for high speed rail.

Something like stage 1a) of a high speed rail network would be from somewhere in central Sydney (Ideally Central – but elsewhere is more like – perhaps Parramatta), to the new Sydney airport, via Kingsford Smith Airport. Stages 2 and 3 would extend the network to Canberra and north to Newcastle, and then on from there.

It would need leadership and recognition of a significant cost and a long term commitment – so no chance from an economics perspective given the short viewed horizon of politicians in this country. But it could be done with political will – but we won’t ever see it.

If you’re only seeing pensioners and families, you’re taking the wrong trains.
In my experience the Sunday, Thursday and Friday evening trains are full of public servants and other workers commuting to and from jobs in Canberra or Sydney. There’s also often a few students traveling between the cities for classes. When I was doing it regularly, I was living in Sydney and working in Canberra, but there’s also plenty of people going the other way, especially with Sydney housing being so expensive.
Another plus of the trains is that the regulars get often get to know or recognize each other and there’s a great community, whether that’s just a friendly wave or a conversation.

Andrew Cooke8:41 am 14 Sep 25

I don’t mind the idea of a 4- hour trip, let’s extend the light rail to the train station so we can easily get there, let’s also upgrade the train station so waiting for the train doesn’t feel like I’m stuck in Cold War Europe

Qantas would never allow it.

You make Qantas sound like Gangsters, ready to sabotage any other convenient form of long distance travel….and then make it look like an accident.

Probably because they’ve got a track record of effectively doing that Karl, in one manner or another.

Dr Leigh’s mob is in power now so he’s no longer interested!

What a wasted opportunity!

I love trains; buses not so much! We could have all been jumping the “faster” train to Sydney, rather than jumping a Murray’s bus or driving and dealing with the traffic and congestion.

Mind you, we would needed a more central location than Kingston to start and end our journeys…..

Despite my love for trains, I’m not that keen on Canberra’s LR to Woden (and beyond, if we all live long enough to see that happen). The issue is purely about the expected travel time.

The Tilt Train could have shaved time of the existing train journey, and the Fast Train, do the trip before you could finish reading the paper. Travel time makes these options really attractive. LR to and from Woden…..well, it fails the principal objective of public transport of getting the folk from A to B as quickly as possible. Woden to the City, I’m sorry to say, from a public transport perspective, buses win.

Sadly, I expect that the efficiency of Murray hourly trips between Canberra and Sydney, means that government’s aren’t going to prioritise upgrading the existing tracks, or doing the big infrastructure spends. Doing so would take dollars away from health, education, defence and our growing NDIS, Aged Pension and welfare systems.

What a wasted opportunity.

It is of particular note that the tilt train trial between Sydney and Canberra was achieved using the existing infrastructure and normal XPT power units.
But that is not the whole story. The faster service had to be integrated with and prioritised over normal (mainly slower freight and local passenger) services between Sydney and Goulburn, and Sydney suburban commuter services, to achieve the time savings. Something that doesn’t seem to occur much with the current service. Solving the integration and priority aspects is probably the harder nut to crack for significantly faster service using existing infrastructure.

The carbon offset of rail is bigger than most ACT government projects. However they are more keen to see the end of the railway and let developers redevelop the land.

Digging a tunnel under the lake and underground station is what civic needs and not light rail.

Imagine if the sydney or Melbourne buildings had underground station.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.