22 September 2025

Coalition imploding over support for net zero in another rough week for Ley

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
47
Leader of the Australian Liberal Party, Sussan Ley MP

First it was migration, now it’s climate change. Division in Coalition ranks is giving Opposition Leader Sussan Ley continual grief. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Opposition frontbenchers and backbenchers alike are increasingly bold in flagging an end to Coalition support for the legislated net zero by 2050 emissions target.

Liberals and Nationals are all but lining up to demand that bipartisan support for the carbon goal be thrown out the window.

Some are going so far as to publicly threaten chaos within Coalition ranks if support for net zero isn’t dropped.

Following a week from hell for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley over Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s divisive comments about migration and Australia’s Indian community, hotheads in the party are now giving the leader more grief over climate change.

Senator Price was sacked from the shadow ministry last week, but this week, Opposition frontbenchers are threatening to quit if they don’t get their way on climate change and energy.

Shadow finance minister Andrew Hastie got the ball rolling this week with a Monday evening radio interview saying he would quit Ms Ley’s frontbench if the Coalition maintains its net zero policy.

Mr Hastie said he would “leave without a job” if the party’s internal review of the policy resulted in the status quo.

“I’ve nailed my colours to the mast,” he said.

“My primary mission in politics is to build a stronger, more secure, more competitive Australia. Energy security is a vital input to that.”

READ ALSO Bold climate and energy policies needed urgently, just look at the science

Mr Hastie said the whole Coalition was “whispering” about the policy.

“I went on Four Corners, and I said the net zero policy is a straitjacket for our economy and our country, and I believe that,” he said.

“I’m actually quite passionate about it.”

Those comments led to shadow education minister Jonathon Duniam saying Mr Hastie wouldn’t be alone in quitting Ms Ley’s frontbench.

Senator Duniam said there would be a “mass exodus” if the Coalition adopted a “net zero at any cost” approach.

“The reality is that most members of our frontbench, and indeed most of the members of our party room, are interested in making sure that whatever we do, if it is to retain a net zero by 2050, doesn’t come at whatever the cost might be,” he said.

Nationals Leader David Littleproud suggested the Coalition’s junior party was ready to abandon the net zero target and would likely formalise that in the future.

“I think there are different ways and better ways than an arbitrary target that the world is not living up to,” he said.

“But the way the Labor Party is undertaking is destroying our economy … We need to understand that there are ways around adaptation and we don’t need to go down an all-renewables approach that is destroying the actual environment but is destroying regional Australia.”

Nationals backbencher Matt Canavan said the Coalition under Ms Ley’s leadership would not be a good one if support for net zero is maintained.

“I’m pretty clear and transparent saying … if we continue with net zero, it’ll continue to be a failure,” Senator Canavan told ABC radio.

“I don’t know how you want to define the future. I don’t think it’ll be a good future if we continue to do that.

“That’s my view, and I’ve been very clear about that.”

READ ALSO Ley’s Liberals want to write off a disastrous week, you think?

That’s just the Coalition commentary so far this week.

Nationals backbenchers (and former deputy prime ministers) Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack have been backing a bill to end Coalition support for net zero since parliament resumed in July.

Following the release this week of the National Climate Risk Assessment report, Ms Ley issued a joint statement with her deputy, Ted O’Brien.

“Climate change is a global problem, and it demands global action. Australia cannot make a difference on its own, but we must play our part,” they said.

“The Coalition will always support sensible action to reduce emissions, strengthen resilience, and protect communities.

“Our nation has the capacity and resources to meet the challenge of climate change with the right policies and priorities.

“This is a moment to reassure Australians. What Australians do not need is alarmist language being used to distract from Labor’s failures.”

Frontbencher Dan Tehan is spearheading the Coalition’s review of the policy.

Party insiders are suggesting that while Ms Ley is publicly keeping all options open until the review is complete, she will not be embracing the “net zero at all costs” policy approach.

The Federal Government is due to release its 2035 interim emissions target this week.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

47
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon11:30 pm 17 Sep 25

This issue will likewise catch up with Labor when the money to prop up their climate change/net zero pantomime runs out.

The outcomes of national elections in the US and western Europe in the next three to four years will be a major determinant of what Australia can and should do, with the most likely outcome being that we will need to have a plausible response to tariffs masquerading as climate-related “Border Adjusment Mechanisms” while also being competitive in markets which won’t bother with that b/s.

“This issue will likewise catch up with Labor when the money to prop up their climate change/net zero pantomime runs out.”

LMAO renewables are the cheapest form of new energy, so this is nonsense comment unless you don’t think we need more energy.

But where were you during the election when Dutton was essentially proposing to nationalise energy so he could build nuclear which the energy retailers & generators had rejected as too slow, expensive and risky?

Stephen Saunders10:36 am 17 Sep 25

The Sussan Albanese government is obsessed with UN net-zero open-borders. Too bad about voters.

You’ll remember mps got ejected because they had allegiance to foreign powers. How is this different

It’s quite the alternative universe you blokes live in. Ley who nodded along with Dutton for three years including his divisive rhetoric on the Voice and his dud nuclear plan and is not working for Albo just because she’s not are far right wing as you are….also immigration is trending down, the borders are not open and renewables are a the cheapest for of energy….so net zero is your friend.

Chris the only thing imploding is Ley’s leadership.

Let’s park that industry and the community are treating the NCRA with complete contempt. At least 60% of global emissions are treating net-zero as a joke – India, China, the USA and Russia. Unachievable politically and physically. In the UK the anti-net-zero Farage leads the polls by 10 points. Europe is rolling back. Even our loud Pacific neighbours run 95% fossil fuel economies.

Australia is a big global outlier. As is the left-leaning media in Australia which has chosen to never question the climate science or the rubbish we hear like $275 energy cost reductions. The cost of Labor’s policies are likely in the hundreds of billions if not trillions. Way more than Dutton’s nuclear proposals, a proven technology.

Why does the left media refuse to question a Labor party intent on economy-wrecking and the de-industrialisation of Australia ? For a 100% guaranteed zero global benefit.

Facebook has sucked up all the advertising revenue that stops small media companies from giving counter information. There is a lack of competition from Facebook.

“0% of global emissions are treating net-zero as a joke – India, China, the USA and Russia.”

Penfold talking through his hat as usual. The world now invests twice as much in renewables as fossil fuels.

https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024/overview-and-key-findings

“Economy wrecking”?? LMAO …..sure. Meanwhile in the real world 10% of China’s GDP is now tied to renewables.

https://energyandcleanair.org/publication/china-clean-energy-industry-can-double-in-value-by-2035/

That’s partially the case, though leftist media (and all media) still has an obligation to investigate facts and report with balance.

They fail in spades.

So 90% of China’s GDP is tied to fossil fuels ⛽️ ?

We do know they started 95GW of new coal-fired plants in 2024, the highest in a decade.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/chinas-construction-of-new-coal-power-plants-reached-10-year-high-in-2024/

“So 90% of China’s GDP is tied to fossil fuels ⛽️ ?”

And Penfold fails to land another puerile, nonsensical misdirect. Sad. Another win thanks.

Meanwhile no one has suggested China has and is doing enough, merely pointed out they’ve invested more than any other country into renewables to the point where 10% of their GDP is now tied to renewables.

Thanks for playing.

The world’s biggest CO2 emitter is the world’s biggest renewable investor ? Well how good is China.

Btw don’t look now seano but they’re also the world’s biggest producer of solar cells.

“The world’s biggest CO2 emitter is the world’s biggest renewable investor ?”

Yes and?

“Btw don’t look now seano but they’re also the world’s biggest producer of solar cells.”

Yes and?

Your whole claim that countries have abandoned net zero when investment in renewables to fossil fuels to is now 2-1 is of course puerile nonsense. Thanks for playing.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.