14 November 2025

Libs' net-zero move a political gift to everyone but themselves

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
8
Barnaby Joyce

Barnaby Joyce can’t believe the success he is having with his anti-net-zero push, but he’s still telling the Nationals he might be ‘outta here” anyway. One Nation is calling after all. Photo: Barnaby Joyce.

And the winner is … Barnaby Joyce … and Anthony Albanese … and even the Greens.

The Liberal Party can certainly not claim any victory from its gobsmacking decision to be dictated to by the Nationals and drop its commitment to net zero.

Nor can it take anything remotely like a sense of satisfaction from the rambling-upon-rambling circus show of a press conference held straight after that decision was made.

In a nutshell, the Liberal Party now “welcomes” the idea that Australia might achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050, but it will no longer commit itself to the target.

The Libs are “out” of net zero but still “in” the Paris Agreement.

It is more than baffling that this has any semblance of logic, especially when it constitutes a breach of the Paris Agreement on international climate change action for any signatory to water down its previously stated commitments.

Australia’s net-zero by 2050 commitment was made by former Liberal Prime Minister Scott Morrison in October 2021 and subsequently legislated in September 2022 by the new Labor government.

Could someone please explain to Sussan Ley how her party can stay committed to the Paris Agreement while not meeting its legislated net-zero targets?

The Opposition Leader herself made a botch of trying to answer that question when asked because, quite simply, it can’t be done.

They can’t have it both ways.

“Well, our policy will always be in the interests of affordable energy for Australian households, and I’m not going to say there’s some detail in an international agreement that prevents us from doing what we know we need to be doing for Australians,” Ms Ley said during the press conference..

“So in government, we would submit our nationally determined contributions, which are short-term targets under the Paris Agreement.”

Fat chance of that ever happening.

The Coalition has consigned itself to Opposition for many years to come.

Or maybe it’s worse than that. Perhaps it’s not too much of a leap to say (as some of the crossbenchers are already saying) the Coalition has consigned itself to oblivion.

It has certainly made itself irrelevant.

Irrelevant on climate change, irrelevant to young voters and irrelevant to inner city voters.

It’s fine for the Nationals to die in a ditch over net zero because they have a locked-on constituency in the bush.

The Liberals will literally die in the ditches they have just dug for themselves in metropolitan electorates where voters are demanding action on climate change.

Instead, the Liberals under Ley’s leadership are making motherhood statements about looking after their kids (but not so much the grandkids, apparently), taking care of the environment in ways other than just setting “pointless” long-term targets, and bringing down power bills (that old chestnut).

The policy that is not yet a policy that was presented on Thursday lacks detail, has no substance at all, and rings completely hollow. Even then, it’s not a policy until the Nationals give it the tick on Sunday.

Let’s see how far taking nuclear power as an energy policy to a federal election gets the Coalition. Hang on, haven’t we already seen how far (backwards) it gets them?

Australians can expect to hear more about nuclear energy and more about coal from the Libs and Nats over the coming months. They can’t help themselves.

Too bad (for them) that fewer people are listening to them with every new day and every new silly policy manoeuvre.

The Prime Minister can’t believe his luck. The Coalition has turned into the gift that keeps on giving to Labor.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has seized the moment, too, and asked whether the government can, in all good faith, now even deal with the Opposition in trying to get its environmental protection laws through the Senate.

Best to strike a deal with the Greens than to negotiate with the Coalition that has so openly displayed its contempt for the environment is the point she is making.

That’s a good point, but maybe don’t hold your breath waiting on that one.

All the while, Barnaby Joyce, whose dummy spit over net zero started this Coalition train wreck, isn’t even committing to staying with his party now that the whole Opposition has followed him down the anti-climate change path.

“This is not about me, this is about getting rid of the policy,” he said when asked if he was now likely to stick with the Nats.

“I keep my cards close to my chest, and I played my part. Now I look forward to seeing what happens on Sunday.”

But really, who cares anymore what happens when the Libs and Nats meet on Sunday to form an agreed energy position?

We already know it will be a corker and one that won’t protect Australia’s future … or the future of the Liberal Party and its leader.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Typical Canberra bubble rubbish. The fact is that in regional Australia there is no appetite for net zero. If the Liberals get out of the way and unable the Nationals and One Nation to sell the “climate change” policy, then they will romp into government. The problem in the past has been the adherence to the Paris agreement and trying to please the IPCC. Bureaucrats in the Foreign Affairs Department have to do that. Farmers in particular have been hurt by the attempts to promote renewable energy, having officials invading their land and telling them that they will have to put up with wind farms and new transmission lines ruining their properties. I think we can now put down this whole thing as a dreadful mistake, and it is hoped that this whole rubbish has not gone so far down the track that it cannot be reversed by the time there is a change of government.

While I suspect there are flaws in the modelling that says renewables are cheaper than coal, I haven’t seen the Libs or Nats release anything of substance that exposes such flaws. Seems a bit premature to pull back on renewables on the basis of cheaper electricity for residents without first making a good showing that there’s a cheaper alternative.

“While I suspect there are flaws in the modelling that says renewables are cheaper than coal, I haven’t seen the Libs or Nats release anything of substance that exposes such flaws.”….could that be because, and bear with me here, the CSIRO and the Energy Generators & Retailers (for profit power companies) are right that renewables are the cheapest form of energy….lol

The Principle Skinner meme seems to apply to your thinking here Garfield…”Am I out of touch?….No, it’s the children who are wrong”. lol

Keep finding ways to ignore evidence that doesn’t confirm your opinions. Funny stuff.

Wait for a couple of Newspolls Chris, you might be in for a shock.

And then wait until 2028 …. though Sussan mightn’t be the person to prosecute the case.

So much copeium.

“Wait for a couple of Newspolls Chris, you might be in for a shock.”

He won’t be. The LNP can’t win without regaining the teal seats which they lost over the climate wars in the first place. They’ve effectively burned that bridge.

The LNP also cannot win in the cities with this nonsensical policy platform…the moderates will all be worried about their seats and rightly so.

Meanwhile, as the Liberals fail to win the cities expect the One Nation to be pushing to pinch seats off the Nats. The only question now is do they descend into minor party status or oblivion. Enjoy.

Penfold just be straight with us one time.
Human induced climate change is a hoax – right ?
(Hint its a yes/no answer & please dont include endless links that nobody reads.)

Pengold is a big fan of forecasting things about Tomorrow.

Of course Tomorrow never actually arrives.

Wasn’t Dutton going to be PM? 😂😂😂👨‍🦯

franky that’s been answered several times. But if you want to read something hilarious have a look at this CSIRO report which seano loves which tells us only 4.6% of atmospheric CO2 emissions are caused by humans.

You might have to read it twice, but that’s what it says !

https://www.csiro.au/en/research/environmental-impacts/climate-change/Climate-change-QA/Sources-of-CO2

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.