12 January 2026

Traffic jam concerns: Cheyne rejects pitch for lights at retirement village entrance

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
38

The LDK Amberfield entrance on Cotter Road at Weston. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The ACT Government has poured cold water for now on calls from a new retirement village in Weston for traffic lights and bus stops to be installed on Cotter Road.

But Amberfield residents have not given up hope that these measures to improve safety and connectivity will be adopted in the long term.

The residents and developer LDK have been lobbying since August last year for improvements to the Fryer Road intersection with Cotter Road to make entering and leaving the site safer and also launched a petition.

This week residents received an official response to the petition from City and Government Services Minister Tara Cheyne, who said concerns about peak-time traffic delays on the busy Cotter Road had weighed against the calls for traffic lights.

Ms Cheyne said Roads ACT needed to balance traffic flow, accessibility and safety for all modes of transport.

“The Cotter Road corridor is already experiencing significant congestion during peak periods, with demand regularly exceeding capacity,” she said.

“In addition, Cotter Road is a key inter-town public transport corridor, which is intended to support bus priority.

“Therefore, any future installation of a new set of traffic signals in that corridor would need to be carefully assessed and would be considered as part of the NCA’s planning process.”

READ ALSO The science behind traffic lights – and why they’re chosen over roundabouts

Ms Cheyne said preliminary investigation had highlighted that signalisation with pedestrian crossing facilities, including an eastbound bus jump lane, would result in increased delays and queuing during morning peak hour.

Queuing could also interfere with the operation of the Tuggeranong Parkway/Cotter Road interchange.

This and other options had been discussed with LDK representatives, including banning right turns out from Fryer Road and all right turns at the intersection.

Ms Cheyne said banning turns would improve safety at the intersection but result in u-turns at other nearby intersections, possibly requiring changes there so that the risk of crashes did not increase.

She said the City and Environment Directorate (CED) would not support bus stops on Cotter Road adjacent to the development unless LDK could provide a safe crossing.

“The ACT Government is willing to consider options put forward by LDK Amberfield that may facilitate this need,” she said.

“Alternatively, other non-infrastructure options should also be considered with an example being a shuttle bus service run by the Amberfield retirement village.”

Tara Cheyne

City and Government Services Minister Tara Cheyne said talks with LDK would continue. Photo: ACT Government.

Ms Cheyne made it clear that the government expected LDK as the lessee to bear the cost of any new infrastructure.

She said Roads ACT would continue to discuss and assess short term options proposed by LDK, potentially through temporary traffic management arrangements while construction works were under way at Amberfield Village.

LDK Amberfield intended to submit a potential infrastructure upgrade option to the NCA and ACT Government for future consideration.

Ms Cheyne said Roads ACT had suggested that this also consider a path connection to the existing Cotter Road path underpass, further to the east.

“The feasibility of LDK’s preferred infrastructure solution/s would then need to be assessed and discussed with the NCA and CED to support progression through NCA’s planning system,” she said.

Connecting Amberfield Task Group convenor Mal Prior said Ms Cheyne had been more cautious than expected, based on feedback from consultations with the Directorates, but the group had not given up on the lights and bus stops in the longer term.

READ ALSO Hearse driver has a message for Canberra motorists

In the meantime, LDK was investigating the option of creating an acceleration lane for the left turn out of Fryer Road on to Cotter Road plus a parallel pathway from that point to connect with the existing pathway system at the Equestrian Centre entry.

“This would provide access for residents and others to the local shops and elsewhere,” Mr Prior said.

“The other pathway connection we are working on is from the rear end of the site down to the Molonglo River corridor pathway system.”

He said agreement was also pending on better and more prominent signage on Cotter Road announcing the village.

LDK said its position had not changed on taking road safety very seriously for its residents at Amberfield.

“As per Minister Cheyne’s response, LDK has been actively engaging with TCCS on alternative safe ways for our residents to access Cotter Road,” LDK said.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

38
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Clearly the safety of retirement village residents and their need to be able to get out and about was not considered when the development plan was approved. Poor planning yet again but that’s nothing new. It’s amateur hour.

The desire of the ACT government to prioritise speed for people in cars rather than safety for those on foot puts pedestrians and other vulnerable road users at risk. This is the reason that has been repeatedly given for not providing a pedestrian crossing over Canberra Avenue near St Edmunds and St Clares. They also rejected traffic lights and an overpass.

After 2 schoolboys were hit by a car and seriously injured, they’re finally considering some sort of solution. Clearly if you’re not in a car, your safety is of no importance to this government but once someone is hit and the media gets involved, the situation changes. They had been warned of the risk but dismissed it, as usual disregarding community views.

chrisjeanemery1:19 pm 12 Jan 26

Pity the government’s priority is to facilitate traffic carrying just 1.1 people. Where are the bus lanes?

Pasquale Obrien12:07 pm 12 Jan 26

People will have to die before ACT Inc and will do anything and even then they’ll make up some excuse. Cheyne get up in assembly and say she supports victims and ‘vision zero’ dream.

Capital Retro1:41 pm 12 Jan 26

Most people who have chosen the place subject of this thread plan to die there anyhow, Pasquale.

The developers would have known how Cotter road works and should have factored in the cost of a proper intersection as part of the development. It’s a major arterial road to and from a rapidly growing area of Canberra.

The lack of a nice overpass to enter and exit the place should weigh heavily on anyone deciding to move themselves or their loved ones in.

Capital Retro3:02 pm 12 Jan 26

I looked at this very appealing development for an “end of life” option when it was advertised as being in Yarralumla and the indicative price for a villa was $1M.

At sign up time the price had increased to $1.5M which was way beyond my means.

This was not gouging by the developer rather than the post COVID price increases on everything and there is no end in sight.

And the workers and visitors? Do they get to die there too?

Capital Retro4:23 pm 12 Jan 26

Good point Mary.

It’s curious that the same logic did not apply when the decision was made to add three new sets of traffic lights to Athllon Drive in Phillip, which carries two Rapid bus routes. One of these traffic lights is programmed to go red every three minutes whether its needed or not. I suppose some traffic flow is more equal than others.

Yes Mary.
Logic? This is the ACT Government.
I can’t wait to see how many traffic lights will appear along Adelaide Avenue for the tram.
We were promised “none” for stage 1. There are four new sets of lights along Flemington/Northbourne.

Grosby, if you do your own research by looking at the plans in the draft environmental impact statement released last year you’ll see that no traffic lights are needed or proposed to accommodate the light rail on Adelaide Ave or Yarra Glen until it reaches Phillip. The proposed route is entirely grade-separated, and the only proposed stops will be accessible from existing road bridges.

That’s half-true. There are no extra traffic lights in the TC-promoted idea that the tram will be an express service Civic-Woden, and then people will wait for a bus back to Barton or to continue south. But public submissions favour the tram stopping at the various offices it passes, noting that several big new offices are going in. It also ignores the intent to build more flats down Yarra Glen, which you’d think would require more stops, unless they’re also going to wait for a bus to Woden to catch a tram going back past their homes.

18 months ago there was a TV advertisement every 30 minutes promoting this location. Perhaps someone at Amberfield should have thought of this problem before building / selling all the high priced properties?
Nah………Profit first.

They probably did think and then decided to build it and then try and push the cost of upgrading the intersection onto the taxpayer instead of costing an overpass intersection as part of the development.

For traffic leaving Amberfield the easiest solution is to allow the right-hand turn in non-peak hours, eg right-hand turn allowed 9.30am 4.00pm and 6.30pm to 7.30am Monday to Friday.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.