16 July 2025

Barnaby Joyce to introduce his own bill to repeal net zero target

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
61
Barnaby Joyce

Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce says there is a “lunatic crusade” over net zero. Photo: The Nationals.

Barnaby Joyce is going to put an end to all this “net zero nonsense” the first chance he gets and that opportunity will be when Federal Parliament returns next week.

The National Party MP and former deputy prime minister has vowed to introduce a Private Member’s Bill to sort out what he is calling Labor’s “lunatic crusade”.

His bill will seek to repeal Australia’s whole net zero target because, he says, it’s been toyed with for far too long and there is far too much at stake.

In social media posts and television interviews over the past few days, Mr Joyce has used a range of expressive terms to describe the net zero target.

His labels have ranged from “crazy” to a “disgrace” to “treacherous” when talking about the Federal Government’s legislated aim to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

The United Nations reports that as of June 2024, 107 countries responsible for approximately 82 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions had adopted net zero pledges.

READ ALSO Former Labor MP to head up Climate Change Department

These commitments were made either in law, in policy documents such as national climate action plans or long-term strategies, or in an announcement by a high-level government official.

“More than 9000 companies worldwide and over 1000 cities, more than 1000 educational institutions, and over 600 financial institutions have joined the Race to Zero, pledging to take rigorous, immediate action to halve global emissions by 2030,” the UN states.

In Australia, laws have been passed to firm the commitment and to promote economic transformation as the nation transitions to a net zero emissions economy.

That shift involves expanding Australia’s energy system and transitioning from coal and gas-fired power to renewable sources such as wind and solar.

But that’s where Mr Joyce comes in. He’s had enough.

“There is no more time to assess, to ponder, to nuance or to amend,” he wrote on Facebook.

“Net zero must be repealed and as such, I will, at my first opportunity, bring forward a bill to do that.

“The idea that, at this stage, we have put the focus of our nation on a lunatic crusade of net zero is treacherous to the very security of Australia.”

In a subsequent media interview, Mr Joyce said the pursuit of net zero emissions risks Australia’s energy security while adding to cost-of-living pressures.

While Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has so far not revealed her position on net zero, there are plenty inside the Liberals and especially the Nationals who are urging Mr Joyce to force a show of hands.

READ ALSO Tourism, trade and questions over Taiwan mark PM’s first days in China

Since the election routing, the Opposition has only 43 of the 150 Lower House seats.

The Coalition has embarked on a review of its policy positions and climate change and energy are among its most contentious.

“I’ve been fighting for this for so long, but I think it’s got to a point we’ve actually got to say ‘okay, let’s see where we vote’,” Mr Joyce told Sky News.

“Or more to the point, if you don’t even want to vote.

“You’re so courageous about the climate, but you won’t even have the debate in the parliament…

“I’m hoping that the people who are so courageous, so emboldened with their virtue about changing the temperature of the globe… if they have that conviction that goes all the way to their desire for the Parliament of Australia to have the debate about net zero.”

But with the Federal Government steadfastly committed to the net zero goal – and with Labor holding a massive majority on the floor of the House of Representatives – what are the chances of Mr Joyce’s bill even being read and considered for debate?

And especially in the first fortnight of the new parliament?

“Look, I’m a realist,” he said.

“I don’t think it gets support, but I think it’s important for the Australian people to understand exactly what is before you.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

61
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Being a Nat, Barnaby represents country folk. Their interests aren’t entirely aligned with us, their city cousins.
In the bush, it’s 4WD Hiluxes, large trucks, tractors, and heavy machinery – all diesel powered. There simply are no other options.

All of that said, I see little point in fighting a battle you can’t even score points in. The best he achieves is to see where other Nats & Libs stand.
The ALP members don’t get a Conscience vote. They vote according to caucus.

It is a curious position to claim to defend our energy and national security while simultaneously demanding continued dependence upon imported fuels, especially when our nation possesses barely a month’s worth of fuel reserves.

It will be fascinating to observe Barnaby’s swift about turn should that supply ever be disrupted, leaving his farming communities stranded. Even a short-term, significant fuel price shock could cripple our economy. Does Barnaby honestly believe that a 1,500 km truck haul from farm to consumer is fueled by “values”? How will he explain the benefits of imported fuel when supermarket shelves are empty and people are going hungry? This vulnerability has already manifested—recall the AdBlue crisis, which was but a taste of what could unfold.

It beggars belief that anyone can seriously claim “security” while furiously defending energy sources that inherently rely on a consistently secure supply of fuel for transport and generation. Coal mines have been flooded before, generators failing or even exploding, sending price shocks through our energy system.

Meanwhile, my car has charged from my roof this week, exhibiting a 0% price correlation with overseas conflicts and China’s relentless attempts to seize control of our primary oil shipping route through the South China Sea. Really hard to pick a side here….

Then again, this argument emanates from an individual who campaigned against cervical vaccines on the grounds of “promoting promiscuity,” while himself engaging in promiscuous behavior. The double standards and logical contortions run strong in this one.

Was your solar system free ?

Capital Retro1:57 pm 16 Jul 25

And was his roof Made in China?
I don’t now about any solar system Penfold as he said his car was charged by his roof.

Must be a smart roof CR. Though perhaps not an ethical roof, with all those rare earth minerals dug up by slave labour.

Penfold once again demonstrating that he cannot make a cogent, rational, evidence backed argument on climate & Energy, and Capital demonstrates that all he can contribute in echoing Penfold’s trolling drivel is some how even less.

Best ignored.

It was a simple question really, was the solar system free. After all, the sun doesn’t send a bill.

Out of interest is the cubby house solar powered or wind powered ?

Capital Retro3:21 pm 16 Jul 25

At your peril, Sean Zero.

And speaking of clowns I see the usual culture wars clowns telling the proven lie that power prices surge on the back of renewables when the truth is the exact opposite.

The massive influx of renewables in recent years has been the only thing keeping a lid on power prices…”Booming renewable energy generation halves wholesale power prices across national grid”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-01-25/wholesale-power-prices-pushed-down/103386062

So Barnaby is still a clown.

Global opposition to the net zero madness is gaining steam. The USA has withdrawn from Paris, Europeans realise it’s unachievable, even Tony Blair has called it madness.

Yet Australia still dreams while power prices surge on the back of more renewables. Energy poverty grows and industry declines. Barnaby is 💯 % correct, stop the madness.

“Global opposition to the net zero madness is gaining steam.”….no it’s not.

Barnaby would be aghast to know you think he’s 100% correct, considering your previous difficulties with percentages.

Percentages are fun chewy. Here’s one – 0% of your posts add any positive value to any discussion.

0 ÷ n = 0 🤗

Hey Penfold – try this experiment at home – go to Google or your preferred AI and ask “how has the length of Canberra’s winters changed in the last 50 years?”.. I look forward to your response.

Demosthenes – yes I took your advice and googled it. The response was sponsored by the greens “think tank”, the Australia Institute. Is that what you meant by “AI” ?

Here’s some more current news:

https://www.weatherzone.com.au/news/canberra-endures-coldest-run-of-nights-in-60-years/1890679

Straight from the fossil fuel lobby, through Penfold’s “mind” unfiltered. Laughable.

Pengold,
Considering your permanent allergy to facts and evidence, your posts on this thread are highly amusing and ironic.

Glad to be of service chewy.

Hey did you know that there are a few countries who have achieved net zero ? Bhutan, Comoros, Guyana and Suriname are amongst them.

Do you know how ? Well they’re some of the best developed countries on earth with the lowest standards of living. But hey at least they can feel good.

As Penfold correctly references in that document, in the world away from his cubby house human-forced climate change is real, and the push for renewable energy should continue. As former PM Blair says there, the world needs policy solutions to help developing countries transition because their emissions are still rising and likely to continue without more serious action. As Blair says, “this is one of the fundamental challenges of our time.”

Damascene, Penfold.

That Blair proposes some largely uneconomic interim or transitional solutions does not alter the problem he defines, one which Penfold accepts as “what’s happening in the world”

Axon do you mean those uneconomic solutions which helped the world lift billions of people into higher standards of living ?

And why is Blair pro- action on climate change but very, very slowly? It’s always about the money.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/30/blairs-net-zero-intervention-invites-scrutiny-of-his-institute-donors

“Glad to be of service chewy”

Pengold’s posts:

-Links an article outlining how important dealing with climate change is, not even realising its the opposite of the point he was trying to make.

-Links to a weather channel.

-Makes meaningless, simplistic and irrelevant comparisons as if they provide some great insight to the issue under discussion.

Pengold doesnt just add 0% positive value to any thread, his posts actually significantly in the negative.

Well chewy it’s great you’ve noted the freezing climate report from Weatherzone. A week of cold – is that weather or climate ? It’s so hard to tell these days.

You probably haven’t read the article. It’s about net zero. Any thoughts on why countries are ditching it ?

“A week of cold – is that weather or climate ? It’s so hard to tell these days.”

I dont think anyone’s surprised by your current confusion, although I cant comment on you suggesting that at one stage in the past basic comprehension was easier for you.

Although glad you think climate change is such a real and important issue to deal with, that you linked an article outlining potential policy options to deal with it.

Well done.

So chewy you still haven’t read the article and are unable to comment on net zero ?

Goodness me, do you have anything on topic to add ?

Penfold once again pretending that climate change which described by trends over time is the same as weather which is a point in time because he can’t win any argument on it’s merits.

Pathetic as always.

He seems more vocal about this than when he was found incapacitated on the floor in civic 😂

Amazing that he’s still in public life considering how little he’s genuinely achieved as a former deputy and acting PM and in spite of his continued public embarrassments and failures.

Barnaby Joyce is the sort person that people think about when they think about the failure of the political class, an in it for himself career politician, with no achievements, who loves to lecture people about standards of morals, ethics and behaviour whilst exhibiting none himself.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.