4 December 2025

Chisholm Vikings closure a warning to government, says ClubsACT

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
23

Could Vikings Chisholm be the first domino to fall? Photo: Clubs ACT.

Chisholm Vikings has been labelled the canary in the coal mine for the clubs industry.

The Vikings Group announced on Tuesday (2 December) that the Tuggeranong club would close on 30 January due to falling revenue and rising costs, but also alluded to the impacts of government policies.

It said the difficult decision was made to safeguard the future of the rest of the Vikings clubs, in Erindale, Lanyon and the Tuggeranong Town Centre.

The closure comes as an independent panel inquires into the future of the club industry.

READ ALSO Leigh outlines plan to crack down on subscription traps and other consumer tricks

Clubs ACT CEO Craig Shannon said the closure was not an isolated event but the direct result of a decade of unaddressed government policy failures.

Mr Shannon said that without decisive reform, more ACT clubs would face the same fate.

“For years, ClubsACT has presented governments with evidence showing that shrinking real revenue, rising compliance costs, restrictive land-use settings, and the absence of transition support would inevitably lead to venue closures,” he said.

“The Chisholm decision is a clear demonstration of what happens when those warnings go unheeded.”

Mr Shannon said the ACT Government’s policies to reduce the number of gaming machines in the ACT and to promote diversification of revenue sources, without sufficient support, were undermining clubs’ sustainability.

“The ACT has for years encouraged clubs to ‘diversify’, while simultaneously imposing lease variation charges, planning hurdles, financial imposts and regulatory burdens that make diversification economically impossible,” he said.

Mr Shannon said the Vikings slated the Chisholm site for closure because it offered the greatest potential for redevelopment aligned with government policy priorities, such as housing and urban renewal.

“Yet even this can only occur after the venue becomes financially unviable,” he said.

Marisa Paterson MLA.

Gaming Reform Minister Marisa Paterson says the government is committed to strong community clubs. Photo: Thomas Lucraft.

Mr Shannon said the closure showed the government lacked an effective transition strategy and that regulatory and fiscal settings were eroding the viability of venues.

He said the loss of gaming machines had only moved gambling to higher-risk online and cross-border environments, undermining genuine harm minimisation.

The result was also a loss of community infrastructure, including gathering spaces, sporting support and social connection.

“ClubsACT calls on the ACT Government and the Inquiry into the Future of the Club Industry to recognise Chisholm’s closure for what it is: a real-world demonstration of policy failure, and a final warning that the current trajectory is unsustainable,” Mr Shannon said.

He said reforms should recognise the community value of clubs, enable genuine diversification, and deliver a managed transition away from gaming revenue rather than unmanaged decline.

READ ALSO Defunct Williamsdale servo to reopen with pumps and plugs

Gaming Reform Minister Marisa Paterson said decisions to close or consolidate venues were made by individual clubs based on operational and market considerations.

Dr Paterson said the government was committed to supporting a strong and sustainable clubs sector as the industry transitioned away from gaming machines and rejected claims that the loss of gaming machines was shifting the gambling problem online.

She said the current inquiry would guide clubs on how to maintain community spaces, support sporting activities, and remain viable in a changing landscape, and urged all clubs to participate.

Recent data from the 2024 ACT Gambling Survey showed that electronic gaming machines caused the greatest gambling harm in the Territory, contributing one-third of all gambling harm, Dr Paterson said.

“Participation in EGMs (19.7%) remains higher than sports betting (15.8%), and over 65 per cent of Canberrans support reducing machine numbers,” she said.

“This underscores strong community backing for the ACT Government’s harm-minimisation approach, and does not support claims that policy is displacing harm to other forms of gambling.”

She said the current inquiry would guide clubs on how they could maintain community spaces, support sporting activities, and remain viable in a changing landscape. She urged all clubs to participate.

“The ACT Government remains focused on balancing community expectations, harm minimisation, and the long-term viability of clubs, ensuring they continue to provide important social and recreational opportunities for Canberrans,” she said.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Mybe they would have been better off turning in thier pokies licences and turning it in to an entertainment complex. Live bands, 18, 21st and 50th brithdays. Wedding receptions, Baptisms.

Clubs have lost their ways. they used to ogger cheap meals subsidised by pokie revenues. Trouble is their food is now as expensive and bad quality. I had a schnitty their a few months ago and it was overcooked and very dry. They wouldnt even replace it. Going to a restraunt these days is just as cheap.

Is this the same vulturous, blood-sucking, amoral and misery causing club that tried to muscle its way into Jerrabomberra four months ago with a $36 million proposal to take advantage of NSW’s lax gambling laws? A proposal that was unanimously rejected by the Queanbeyan Palerang Regional Council and the NSW Planning Panel because it was incompatible with adjoining development works and failed on all counts to meet community expectations. Not to mention community concerns which included the clubs failure to produce an effective management plan, inability of proponents to adequately consider the bulk, scale and compatibility of existing infrastructure, no existing or planned sporting clubs in the area to support such a plan, social impacts of gambling and alcoholism to the community, etc. etc.

Now the club, through years of financial mismanagement has its hands out for more taxpayers dollars, blaming the government for its own misfortunes (as if they didn’t get enough support) and taking advantage of monetary loopholes to redevelop the site.

Good riddance!

The Canberra Labor government had allowed clubs to set their goal with a substantial quantities of poker machines back in 2002.
This had made it possible for the sporting clubs to gear their profits from those machines.
The we have the Canberra Labor government, diminish the quantities of these machines, thus crippling clubs to survive financially. Unfortunately most politicians have not been business owners prior to entering politics.

Capital Retro6:29 pm 04 Dec 25

Clubs closing is a generational thing.

Remember the number of ethnic clubs that were in Canberra in the 1970’s and 1980s? The people who established them believed their children would “carry on the heritage tradition” but that didn’t happen and most of them have closed. I plan to do a study of these clubs one day – there are some great stories to tell.

Children of the “mainstream” clubs’ members have also not followed their parents expectations by becoming club members like their parents and if they gamble (sadly a lot do) they do it online, at home.

Also, the children of traditional beer drinking club members now use recreational drugs.

I have a lot of conflicting thoughts about the closure of Vikings at Chisholm.

Upfront, let me say, I’m not a poker machine player, and that I find all addictive forms of gambling destructive.
That said, we all have our vices, and I accept most activities in moderation are ok. So, the pokies are tolerable, and they have their place as one of the revenue sources for Clubs.

The government on the other hand aren’t shy when it comes to pocketing their poker machine taxes, and it could be argued that if the level of taxes were lower, Clubs could survive with less machines. Now there is an idea 💡.

I shook my head when I read that Dr Patterson, on behalf of the ACT Government stated that the majority of those aged 65 or older oppose poker machines and that electronic gaming machines represent 19.7%, which “remained higher” than sports betting at 15.8%.
It’s not surprising that older folk aren’t in favour of pokies, however the thing that hit me was that the reference to gambling via pokies still “remains higher” than than sports betting.
Does the government consider sports betting a better form of gambling?
Would the level of pokies gambling be acceptable, if
the level of sports betting continued to grow?
Let’s face it, it’s so much easier to gamble at home on your phone, where you have no restrictions or monitoring, than to go out to a Club.

Personally, I think the concern should be on the total impact of gambling; not just pokies.

Of course, it’s not just the ACT Government bleeding Clubs dry through various policies and taxes, the Federal Government (current & past), have been raising beer excise every 6 months, to a point where it’s financially crippling to go to your local pub or club.

It’s now cheaper to drink and gamble at home and with that, the ACT Government now has an Inquiry on the same day delivery of alcohol. There is plenty of “Nannying” going on here.

So after bagging both levels of government, I see Clubs themselves, who (like pubs) are no longer about their members and patrons, but have now consolidated and morphed into larger groups or corporate entities, driven by profit margins and returns on investment. For a Club, that is part of a larger group closing down a venue due to financial constraints, and yet having plans for a new site in Jerrabombera just makes me wonder what are the real issues driving these decisions? What will happen to the existing site and improvements which are supposedly “owned” by members?
What are the true losses at Chisholm? What are the financial projections for Jerrabombera, that Vikings are prepared to jettison Chisholm and move across the border?

Is the reason simply that the NSW Government is more business/Clubs friendly?

I even look at Vikings’ pledge to retain their staff and employ them throughout their other venues. Sure, the staff will be offered work, however, with more available staff to fill the existing rosters, on average, there will be a reduction in hours per employee.

I can’t help feeling there is a fair bit of government lip service and spin going on here, and Vikings seem to be walking away from employees, contractors, musical entertainers and the broader community 😒

Phil Waterman2:04 pm 04 Dec 25

As long as Barr government commits to every thing nothing gets done and if it does it is at a ridiculous amount of money-so where are all the Canberra politicians now election are done feeling guilty / hiding telling themselves there doing a good job !!

Hugh J’Organ1:56 pm 04 Dec 25

Why do I think that this will never happen to any of the myriad Labor Clubs? In fact, will Labor be taking over Chisholm Vikings ?

Have you not seen that the Weston Creek Labor club is planned for almost the exact same sort of closure/redevelopment as Chisolm Vikings?

Scott Nofriends1:24 pm 04 Dec 25

ACT Clubs should not be allowed to use the term ‘Community’. They are businesses driven by profit and sadly, it seems greed.

But southern cross clubs are christian clubs based on christian standards. Oooohhh line the pockets I get it now try to dodge taxes cause ya know Jesus

I’m still shocked by this, it’s so surprising to read that a mainstream community/sports club is closing down. It would be like Australia no longer having a Rugby/AFL team!

Scott Nofriends3:54 pm 04 Dec 25

Me too. It’s very sad. What a terrible Christmas present for the people of Chisholm and surrounding suburbs. And for the wonderful staff at Vikings Chisholm. Even though the club has promised to transfer their jobs to other clubs, I’m sure it’s very unsettling for them.

Yeah, I’m with Franky22 on this.

A “Sporting and Community Club” as I remember them from my early years, was generally a weatherboard or Fibro institution, erected and run by members to support whatever their common interest or sport was.
The whole idea of having a club house to sell some refreshments and dinner, and maybe house a few pokies, was to raise funds to put back into the oval / golf course / bowling green / club interests.
They were run by volunteers and committees and a few employed bar staff and green keepers.

Nowadays, it’s all about profits and big fat wages for the executives, very little of the cash filters down to the grassroots.

Most clubs now list “In-Kind” payments ass donations.
This is where they allow a group to utilise, say an otherwise un-occupied meeting room, for free, but apply a nominal out of pocket cost on an invoice, which they then determine to be the value of a donation.

So long as the associated cricket ovals don’t go the same way as the Golf course at Narrabundah, where the 4th hole has been cut short because a housing development spung up on the adjoining land then complaints were made about stray balls.

It’s such a good oval, would be a shame to see it in decline.

You make a very good point and I can see the majority of these problems is due to greed. Also, it’s a disturbing trend of fun and social venues closing to be demolished for housing. People have to live somewhere but what are they going to do apart from work and go home?

How about releasing the Club’s balance sheet as evidence.

Hope this isn’t another ploy to cash in on more housing.

That’s exactly what it is

Martin Silsby10:06 am 04 Dec 25

Would love to see the renumeration package for all of the senior management…

It is laughable the clubs crying broke. So what happened to all the money they have leeched out of the community through gambling over the years? They never thought to invest and diversify? They never thought to seek a revenue source that doesn’t destroy families? Alcohol and gambling. Now they have the audacity to say it’s the government’s responsibility to come up with a business model for them and to hold their hand and do it for them.

From what I’ve read the club cut back in gambling by reducing poker machines. The twist is they’re claiming this as a lose of money.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.