30 May 2025

Green Shed owner claims Vinnies is flouting the contract for Goodies Junction stores

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
68
Goodies Junction, Mugga Lane.

Goodies Junction at Mugga Lane has been operating for one year, since taking over from The Green Shed. Photos: James Coleman.

The Green Shed owner has criticised the ACT Government for not enforcing its contract with the St Vincent de Paul Society (Vinnies) over the sale of items at its Goodies Junction stores.

May 2025 marks exactly a year since Vinnies took over operation of the reuse facilities at the Mugga Lane and Mitchell resource management centres – and renamed them ‘Goodies Junction’ – after winning a government tender.

Charlie Bigg-Wither and his wife, Sandie Parkes, operated the facilities for 13 years.

The change of ownership drew the ire of many in the community, with a Change.org petition in 2024 to “prevent the closure of Green Shed” racking up more than 8000 signatures.

READ ALSO Rising parking prices a sign of ‘CBD vibrancy’? Not in Canberra, according to new paper

In response, the ACT Auditor-General, Michael Harris, agreed to review the initial procurement process for “fairness” and “transparency”. Mr Harris handed down a couple of recommendations, but ruled the overall process was “effective” and above board.

However, in a post to The Green Shed’s official Facebook page this week, Mr Bigg-Wither claimed that certain clauses in the contract, rather than any unfairness in the procurement process, were the real reason his company lost the operation.

Screenshots of the government contract reveal how the operator was expected to maintain an “electronic database” and record “each reusable item accepted at the facility”, whether from a customer or salvaged.

This record was to include the facility where the particular item is accepted, its estimated weight, its location within the store, its price, and the date and time at which it’s sold.

Government contract excerpt

The government contract, showing the requirement to maintain an “electronic database” of items. Photo: Screenshot, The Green Shed.

“As far as TGS can understand, we were unsuccessful in retaining our contract because we were unable and unwilling to comply with these contract obligations as we did not feel comfortable that we would be able to offer the same level of services to the community,” the post reads.

It went on to claim that “after 12 months, none of these contractual obligations are being met” by Vinnies either.

In a subsequent interview with Region, Mr Bigg-Wither said The Green Shed offered to weigh donations as they came in, and record them under categories like homeware, hardware, outdoor, pets, etc, but “that wasn’t good enough for the government”.

“The reason we didn’t get the tender, as far as we can assume … is because we were unwilling to track the price, weigh and describe every single item that came through the shed.

“Like, how do you put a price tag on a roll of chicken wire that’s out the back in the rain, and is going to sell for 20 cents? All that stuff was just stupid to us.”

READ ALSO Helmet wearing ‘just not the norm’ for majority of Canberra’s young e-scooter riders, study finds

He said he’s been told Vinnies wasn’t adhering to these clauses either.

“And if it were being done, everything would have a barcode on it, because the only way you can physically enter that much stuff is to have some kind of point-of-sale system.”

He said his drawing attention to it “is not so much about us losing the tender anymore” but “about holding the government responsible”.

He called for the government to either “ensure contract compliance” or “ignore or remove these clauses from the contract”.

“If they choose the second option, then legally and morally, the tender should be put out for public tender as the operation of this service does not meet many of the requirements that were advertised,” he wrote on Facebook.

Second-hand store

Items for sale at Goodies Junction, Mugga Lane. Photo: James Coleman.

In response to questions, the ACT Government said it “monitors the contractual obligations in the reusables contract closely to ensure compliance”.

“To meet the conditions of the contract, obligations are monitored through a range of mechanisms including, but not limited to, regular contract management meetings, scheduled reporting cycles and regular inspections of the facilities,” a spokesperson told Region.

“The contractor operates within a performance framework, and any potential or actual non-compliances are highlighted and addressed directly with the contractor.”

The government also confirmed Goodies Junctions is required to weigh items, record when items are donated and sold, and for how much, with these records held by Goodies Junction.

The St Vincent de Paul Society declined to comment.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

68
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Scott Meikle4:07 pm 02 Jun 25

How did “Tiny” the diamond miner get kept of this, it was always a massive rort, bigger than Vinnes and Smith Family combined, the later do annual reports and still pay out allegedly 40% of what they bring in. The Green Shed they accepted allegedly unwanted goods, marked them up 100% + and profited. And fact, even with an estate sale would want to charge you a pick up fee.

Looks like I wont waste time taking stuff there. Very dismissive attitude when I first went.

The tone of this article is rather negative and yet…it makes we want to shop there! LOL

If, as the comments here suggest, the new operator is turning everyone away, why can’t the Green Shed people just replicate their earlier model. Yeah it won’t be at the tip, but surely there are big sheds in a fenced yard available for lease in Mitchell and Hume.

@Heavs
I think the original intention, back when it was run by Revolve, then taken over by Green Shed, was to have the convenience of a one-stop-shop … so that Canberrans could drop appropriate goods for repurposing, before dumping the junk off for landfill.

Mind you, your suggestion is not outlandish, as a southsider, I’d definitely return to Green Shed, if it was at Hume.

Maryanne Duncan7:22 am 01 Jun 25

Actual, personal experience since Vinnies took over! they just turn you away, reason? ‘We’re full’! Lesson learnt, don’t waste time and resources going there. I agree with other comments here, use local no pay groups instead. Vinnies is not operating this business as it was intended, they’re filling the landfill. The people Vinnies have on the door! Vague answers with clear undertone of ‘bugger off’! Not as far as intimidating, but very unsettling. Shame on Vinnies! No surprise, shame on ACT govt. Just admit you got it wrong and bring the Green shed crew back!

HiddenDragon9:06 pm 31 May 25

Anyone familiar with the practicalities of dealing in secondhand goods would know that strict and unfailing compliance with the contract conditions shown in the excerpt above would be unlikely – particularly in a large operation which handles a very diverse range of goods.

If the primary purpose of the operation is to minimise the amount of reusable items going to landfill while providing a reasonable financial return – rather than satisfying public officials who are untroubled by commercial realities that no one is getting away with anything that they don’t like the look or sound of – then contract conditions more focused on outcomes than on elaborate process would make a lot of sense.

@HiddenDragon
“then contract conditions more focused on outcomes than on elaborate process would make a lot of sense”
Nobody forced Vinnies to sign the contract, but once they did then surely it’s reasonable to expect them to comply with the provisions therein.

Paul Holbrook7:30 pm 31 May 25

Most of these comments are not addressing the genuine complaint from Green Shed. They lost the contract based on lies. The ACT bureaucrats have not administered the contract correctly.

That’s true. But residents are not in a position to comment on contractual issues. But they are in a position to observe that Goodies are fundamentally not performing the service they pretended they would, are unpleasant to deal with and reject lots of stuff and say ot should be dumped

The previous owners definitely did a better job. I wasn’t aware Vinnies are telling people to chuck their stuff in the landfill like people here are saying in the comments (which is against the whole reason the junk shop was set up in the first place — remember “No Waste 2010”? Yeah). But you can certainly see the place is half empty these days without the piles of junk that made it worthwhile going there. See, for a junk shop, junk is good. Not tidy, with stuff arranged into colour groups. Just unapologetic piles of junk. That’s what makes a good junk shop. The previous operators knew it but Vinnies don’t get it.

This Govt amazes me at the way they run tenders. This is a recyclable facility and as such runs on a thin margin. There is nothing in it that would permit them to meet the UNNECESSARY govt conditions. Then thereis Kingston Markets, working perfectly and some nitwit decides to put a tender out on that. How about we put a tender on “governance”-this mob would be out on their ear. Concentrate on core business you lot!

@Seascout59
“There is nothing in it that would permit them to meet the UNNECESSARY govt conditions.”
As I said above – Vinnies didn’t have to sign the contract, but once they did they are obligated to meet the conditions, even if you consider them unnecessary.

chrisjeanemery1:05 pm 31 May 25

I wonder how the government took into consideration the substantial donations to charities made by The Green Shed.

Did vinnies know upfront it wouldn’t be able to meet that clause?
Surely they would have been asked how they would meet that, and that become a part of the deal. Lack of that just cries they wanted to get rid of the current mob with terms that made no sense.
We can see what vinnies got out of the deal, what did the govenment get?
There should be two recycling centres next to each other to promote competition.

Public servants love process. It gives them something to report and up the line a minister can issue a glowing media release citing how many kgs of goods in this category or that were recycled. But the reality is what actually comes through the door with cars lined up waiting to unload. A ute full of timber. Do you weigh each individual piece? Because guaranteed you won’t be selling them altogether. And then how do you track THAT piece of timber when they are off-cuts that look the same as all the others in a pile of timber. Customers lined up at the counter waiting to pay $2 while you’re in the system trying to ID a picture frame out of a hundred sitting in big boxes. What an onerous nightmare to impose on anyone.

I read that in the article, that the contract says to weigh and database everything. Sounds like bureaucrats with absolutely no world experience but quite a lot of er, neurodiversity, got their hands on the tender process. Just bonkers, obviously can’t be implemented and sure enough, isn’t done. I’ve bought stuff there since the Vinnies takeover. The nose-ring girls certainly don’t start tapping away at the keyboard entering data. They just take your money and you take your stuff.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.