27 May 2025

Jerrabomberra residents in last-ditch bid to stop Vikings club proposal

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
24

What the entrance to the proposed Vikings Poplars club in Jerrabomberra will look like. Images: Benson McCormack Architecture.

The Jerrabomberra Residents Association and neighbours of the proposed $36 million Vikings club in the Poplars precinct will mount a last-ditch attempt on Tuesday to stop the development when they address the Southern Regional Planning Panel, which will decide the matter within seven days.

Backed by a 15 May submission from the Queanbeyan Palerang Regional Council opposing the proposal, the Association and neighbour residents will argue that the development is inappropriate for the almost 20,000 sqm site, which sits within the proposed Poplars subdivision off Tompsitt Drive.

They are concerned about the social impacts of poker machines and late-night alcohol sales and are not assuaged by a change in closing from 3 am to 2 am.

READ ALSO Planning changes may evolve, but suburbs cannot avoid the missing middle

Vikings intends building the club in two stages, comprising three buildings up to three storeys high, two car parks, a pond and a viewing platform. It will cater for 1320 patrons and Vikings argues that the new club will be a community resource in a growing area.

Vikings has also rallied to head off the negative council submission. It provided a late submission last week, addressing its concerns and saying it had feedback from 186 residents who support the project.

Julie Collins lives 60 metres from the site on Dixon Place and will address the panel.

Ms Collins said that despite minor changes from Vikings, her opposition remains.

She told Region last year that residents feared more traffic and noise, loss of privacy and the potential for drunkenness and crime, as well as being worried about the loss of habitat, trees and green space.

Ms Collins said on Monday that NSW Police were also concerned about the club spawning criminal behaviour from gambling and late-night service of alcohol, including domestic violence, and not having the resources to deal with it.

“The commander of the New South Wales District Police attended one of our JRA meetings and said there was no reason for a sporting club of this size to be trading until 2 am in suburbia,” she said.

The QPRC submission also raises these concerns from the Monaro Police Command, but the Vikings submission prepared by Knight Frank says the club had addressed police concerns.

A view of the club from the pond and its viewing deck.

QPRC says the proposal is inconsistent with the intended planning framework and community expectations for the area, as well as being out of character.

It says the current zoning is for small-scale, neighbourhood-serving commercial and community uses, not a large-scale club trading until 2 am daily.

The council is also worried about the social impacts of alcohol and poker machines, noise, traffic congestion, overshadowing, pressure on local infrastructure and loss of habitat.

The Vikings’ submission rejects this, saying the proposal has community support and the club has undertaken a detailed consultation process.

It includes a noise emission assessment prepared by Acoustic Dynamics, which the submission says addresses the matters raised in the council’s peer review and confirms that the noise impacts can be mitigated and managed.

The proposal has been adjusted to include baffles within the landscaping to further reduce noise levels, airlocks within the first floor level to serve the function rooms, and acoustic screening to the outdoor dining area adjoining the pond. There will be no outdoor amplified music after 9 pm.

READ ALSO There’s a new solar rebate on the horizon. Are you eligible?

Vikings argues that, as a longtime gambling and alcohol provider, it has programs in place to manage and minimise adverse impacts, as well as a robust anti-money laundering/counter-terrorism financing program to prevent misuse.

It says ecologically sensitive areas of the site will be protected. The proposal has cleared Commonwealth environmental hurdles.

But Ms Collins remains unconvinced.

“Nothing has changed,” she said.

“Each submission that they’ve put in for their DA, they’ve tried to address concerns, but this DA and subsequent submissions still include errors and inconsistencies that cannot be relied on.”

The panel will hear from the community at 3 pm on Tuesday (27 May) in the Braidwood Room in the Nellie Hamilton Centre, 257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

24
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

If someoine was to open a sports club without pokies and with live entertainment on friday and saturday nights i would be their first member. I would garantee a lot more people would be interested too.

Pokies are the biggest scam in Australia and nothing the government does short of an outright ban will not work.

Im not saying this should happen im just saying give people options.

Ah, the familiar sound of last-ditch resistance dressed up as community concern. The JRA and a handful of neighbours are making a lot of noise about traffic, noise, and trees – all standard fare. But scratch the surface and you might find more than just worried locals behind the opposition.

Let’s not kid ourselves. The QPRC’s sudden opposition, handed down with barely a glance to process or genuine engagement, feels less like planning rigor and more like political theatre. And when a club like Vikings dares to invest in the future of Jerrabomberra—jobs, community space, sport—it’s curious how quickly the barricades go up.

Could it be that some interests in Queanbeyan aren’t too keen on a new hub drawing people and revenue south of the river? Maybe. But it’s telling that a project with broad community backing and planning merit is being stalled by the same old scare campaigns and conveniently timed police quotes.

It’s not a crime to build something meaningful. But it does threaten those who profit from things staying exactly the same.

What a curious post. Why not just say what you want to say?

I for one hope the residents win. Another greedy club, more pokies and extra misery.

I have only been to Jerrabomberra a few times but isn’t there only one road in and out?

Another bushfire event and a catastrophe waiting to happen!

You could just look at a map before commenting in error Jack.

And we are well aware of your continued dislike of community facilities.

I did look at a map and I wouldn’t like to be one of those close to 10,000 residents fleeing a catastrophe such as a rapidly approaching fire. And no I have never expressed a dislike of community facilities which include national parks, sports facilities, libraries, theatres, museums and even clubs. I have simply expressed my disgust at those greedy clubs who prey on those less fortunate and rely on gaming revenue and misery to make a buck!

Jack,
Seeing as the area has more exits than many other locations in the region, seems like you wouldn’t like to be in many places.

No need to double down on your ignorance around the layout and roads in the area, you could have just admitted the mistake.

And sorry, you’ve regularly expressed dislike around numerous community facilities that aren’t clubs, particularly in your wish for them to be replaced with more high density apartments instead.

Thankfully chewy I don’t live in Jerrabomberra and don’t have to worry about getting my family out in an emergency.

Chewy14 is a regular in these pages disparaging me for my criticisms of clubs for their greed and supporting their efforts in relying on gambling revenue, tax breaks and public funding to expand their operations and significant landholdings. Not only clubs but churches and until recently, a publicly funded Catholic hospital all sitting on some of our city’s most lucrative real estate. Land gifted to them by previous conservative governments which they have developed and expanded while continuing to benefit from tax breaks and public funding enacted by previous federal governments to win votes and undermine the ACT’s leasehold system to the continuing detriment of ACT residents.

Hopefully you live in an area with more than 3 main exits then Jack or you could be in strife.

The rest of your comment is mighty ironic when you have no problem with developers making windfall profits off the removal of community facilities to the detriment of the entire community. With Jack D showing unrelenting support for reducing amenity for citizens so private entities can make more profit.

And the expenditure of billions in taxpayer funds to support and expand that private gain.

Jack D. you forgot about all the money they give back to the communities through kids sport. love how you ALWAYS focus on the negatives. im not a big fan of pokies either, however people have choices and are not FORCED to spend all their money on them. in 2025 there is certainly enough help out there for people who genuinely want it.

The percentage of money clubs give back to the community in proportion to gaming revenue is MINISCULE.

What a hypocrite you are chewy14! You were recently in these very pages supporting the ACT’s leasehold system and arguing for the government to get on with the job of exercising its rights over leasehold lands by reclaiming them when needed. Farmers who have benefited financially over the decades from our territory’s leasehold system and clubs who have been gifted large parcels of land in prime locations. Lands whose values have increased significantly and landholders profiting from vast financial windfalls to the detriment of local ratepayers.

As to babyal running the same tired and conservative line that we hear so much from Mark Parton and the silly James Milligan. I have never doubted there are many good clubs in the ACT who have strong links to the community including multicultural, sporting and even political. I am a member of some of them. There are also those clubs who have amassed their wealth from preying on the vulnerable by relying on government loopholes, gaming revenue and misery to make their fortunes. One of these is linked to the Catholic church and has amassed most of its wealth from gambling revenue and selling off land gifted to them.

I have vivid and recent memories of the ACT Auditor-General’s report into the ACT’s club industry. Uncovering multitudes of corruption including a lack of reporting in annual returns and 1,455 in community and financial contributions that could not be accounted for. The report is available on the agency’s website and makes interesting reading!

Jack,
You clearly didn’t actually follow the discussions around leases or the leasehold system.

The comments I made were suggesting that it was perfectly fine for the government to resume rural leases where those lease conditions were written specifically with far less security and tenure than the standard 99 year urban leases.

Other posters were suggesting that those rural leaseholders be given more rights than the terms under which they’d freely signed up for as outlined in the specific lease conditions.

So no, not remotely hypocritical by me. Actually exactly in line with the comments I’ve made here and previously.

Even though it has little to do with the issue of a club in NSW or your continued support for (hypocritically) opposing windfall gains for private entities or taxpayer funding of private profit but only when it suits you.

Do keep up.

Scott Nofriends1:46 pm 27 May 25

Got one of these down the road from me in Chisholm. Life goes on.

I admit I only read the first few paragraphs of this but had to stop because….I’m confused. From what I was told, Vikings club was a chain of Sports/Community clubs for the Tuggeranong region. Why is their a proposal to build a Vikings club in Jerrabomberra? I was always told that Jerrabomberra is not part of the ACT.

ACT is reducing poker machine numbers, so I suspect this is the club’s way of getting around that (because you are correct – Jerrabomberra is in NSW not ACT).

No different to Raiders having a club in Queanbeyan (Queanbeyan Leagues Club).

Clubs don’t care – they’ll go wherever there are suckers… oh I mean poker machine addicts… oh sorry I mean ‘casual gamers’ to contribute to their empire building. Doesn’t matter if that is NSW, ACT or anywhere else.

Just NIMBYs being NIMBYs.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.