6 May 2025

Labor goes to ground amid claims of foul play

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
31

Independent candidate for Bean Jessie Price has lodged a complaint over this flyer, which appears to be from the Greens, but claims to be authorised by the ALP. Photo: Supplied.

The Australian Electoral Commission is investigating claims that Labor distributed misleading how-to-vote flyers on election day at some booths in the seat of Bean.

The count in Bean remains too close to call, although independent Jessie Price is closing in on Labor’s David Smith.

The ALP is a few hundred ballots ahead, but Ms Price’s vote remains too close for comfort for the incumbent MP.

As counting resumed on Tuesday, the Price team lodged a complaint with the AEC over a flyer it says Labor distributed on polling day (3 May) that was disguised to look like a Greens’ recommendation.

The flyer (pictured above) states that it is authorised by P. Erickson, Australian Labor Party in the ACT.

It is green and recommends Greens voters put Labor number two on their ballot paper, even though the Greens’ actual how-to-vote card placed Labor at the number three spot.

The independent candidate has called foul play over the flyer.

READ ALSO Yes, it’s definitely game on in the battle for Bean

“Members of the public have brought to the attention of my campaign team that the Labor Party distributed a potentially misleading how-to-vote card in the seat of Bean on election day,” Ms Price said in a statement.

“The Labor Party used a green coloured flyer, instead of the party’s official red, urging Greens voters to give their second preference to the ALP.

“This is contrary to the official Greens Party how-to-vote guide, which recommended voters place the ALP third.

“We have received reports that this how-to-vote card was distributed at several booths across Bean.

“During months of listening to the community, the residents of Bean told me that integrity in government is important to them, and it is important to me. I might not win this seat, but it doesn’t matter. This is about integrity and ensuring voters are accurately informed.

“After such a positive campaign, it is really disappointing to discover this type of behaviour occurred.

“It is this type of behaviour that turns people away from the major parties.

“My campaign team has formally reported this to the Australian Electoral Commission as a potential breach of the Commonwealth Electoral Act.”

Ms Price is referring to Section 329 of the Act, regarding misleading or deceptive publications.

That section says: A person shall not, during the relevant period in relation to an election under this Act, print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit or authorise to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing that is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a vote.

READ ALSO AEC enters next stage of vote counting

“We are concerned, as are members of the public, that this green coloured and targeted how-to-vote card may well have misled or deceived voters, and we look forward to the AEC’s ruling,” Ms Price said

The AEC has confirmed to Region that it is examining the issue.

The Greens are also outraged by the flyer and are understood to be considering their own complaint to the AEC.

Some Greens volunteers on booths in Bean are reporting that some voters told them they had already been given a Greens’ how-to-vote card when in fact it was not the Greens’ card these voters had received.

Greens candidate for the seat of Bean, Sam Carter, *did not respond to Region’s request for comment.

Neither did Mr Smith nor anyone from Canberra Labor’s media team.

It remains only an allegation, but at this stage it cannot be confirmed who might have been distributing the flyers on election day.

The AEC will report its findings once its investigation is complete.

Region was the first and only media outlet to call Bean ahead of the election as a tight contest to watch.

* The Greens’ Sam Carter has subsequently responded to Region with this reply: “The Greens advice to our supporters as to how they should number their preferences was very clear.

“For Labor to misrepresent this by distributing contrary advice, under the guise of it being direct correspondence from the Greens, is disingenuous and extremely disappointing.

“The Greens try to do politics differently, and spreading misinformation on behalf of other parties is the exact behaviour that voters don’t want to see.

“We do intend to make a complaint to the AEC.”

Join the conversation

31
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Capital Retro8:16 am 07 May 25

This is about as low as a political party can get.

I mean, Labor was making dead people in Queensland vote in one election but distributing forged how to vote flyers beats that.

@Capital Retro
History has shown us that, in politics, every side can sink into the gutter, CR.

No doubt you thought Advance Australia’s corflute, depicting Pocock as a Greens candidate, in the 2022 federal election, was an excellent strategy, because it supported Seselja’s failed attempt to stay in the Senate. Obviously the AEC disagreed.

Some great guy2:18 pm 07 May 25

Greens did it in Griffith at pre polls, they can’t get up in arms here.

In Griffith they printed out blue slips encouraging liberal voters to put the green at number 2 without mentioning that he was a green candidate and trying to pass him off as an independent.

Nothing was forged. It was potentially misleading. False representation on the electoral roll is an offence whereas the flyers were not. It is foolish to misrepresent that fact.

Regarding Queensland, as Shepherdson QC wrote in his 2001 enquiry,
“No evidence, however, was revealed indicating that [false enrolments] had been generally used to influence the outcome of public elections. Where it was found to have been used in public elections, the practice appeared to be opportunistic or related to the family circumstances of particular candidates rather than systemic or widespread.”

Capital Retro5:36 pm 07 May 25

Thanks, comrade.

Is “potentially misleading” the same as “almost unique” or “a little bit pregnant”?

Absolutely poor form from Labor. I’d like to hear what Mr Smith has to say on the matter. If he actually needed these votes to win then maybe he should consider stepping down.

FWIW When the Liberals did something along similar lines in 2019 it was found not to have materially affected the result.
https://www.aec.gov.au/FAQs/files/21-1579-factsheet-purple-signage-02.pdf

Some great guy2:19 pm 07 May 25

The greens did it this election in Griffith too.

The AEC should look to tighten the rules then. I’m not convinced HTV change much in elections but our elections should be the contest of ideas not scuzzy tricks to pull the wool over the eyes of voters.

You won’t hear Smith talk about it. That would mean appearing in public

Capital Retro9:29 pm 06 May 25

“That section says: A person shall not, during the relevant period in relation to an election under this Act, print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit or authorise to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing that is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a vote.”

Albo is lucky the word lying isn’t included.

Out of interest, was it lying when you told me Dutton was coming to save me Capital?

@Capital Retro
You are right about “lying isn’t included”, CR.

If it was, arguably no government would ever get re-elected, but certainly none since JWH turned lying into an art form, with his (in)famous “core commitments” quote.

Capital Retro11:41 am 07 May 25

Well he did save you Seano, so you should thank me.

Unlike you, I am not connected to any political party or cause in any way.

Capital Retro11:43 am 07 May 25

If Howard turned it into an art form then Gillard created a masterpiece with “there shall be no carbon tax under a government I lead”

“Unlike you, I am not connected to any political party or cause in any way.”… i almost choked on my drink. Good one Capital.

I’d like to know which party I’m connected to in your fantasy world considering I consistently advocated voting for independents. See if you can make me laugh twice in one day.

@Capital Retro
Yes indeed, Gillard learnt from the master.

No doubt you remember Howard’s promise in May 1995, that a GST would “never ever” be part of the Liberal Party’s policy – and fast forward to 1998 …. Then of course, there’s the Liberal party campaign in 2004, promising to keep interest rates at record lows – and we know that by October 2007 the RBA was poised to raise rates for the sixth time since that promise was made.

Yes, CR, it would appear that neither major party has a monopoly on lying.

Speaking of lies, JWH never said that. He did say that interest rates would always be lower under the Coalition.

It’s a great line, can never be disproven.

@Penfold
Oh, Penfold, yet again, you make yourself look foolish.

I didn’t say JWH said it. It was in the Liberal party campaign at the 2004 election … even JWH admitted it in October 2007:
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/howard-admits-breaking-promise-to-keep-rates-low-20071027-ge9922.html

Maybe you should learn to use google … it will save you embarassment.

No embarrassment here JS, just entertainment. Nice pay wall btw !

@Penfold
I’m not sure if you are technically challenged, or you have exceeded your quota of complimentary Brisbane Times articles, as I was able to scroll and read the full article.

Nevertheless, for your education, here is the text of the article:
“Prime Minister John Howard yesterday admitted breaking a promise to keep interest rates at record lows.

Mr Howard has previously denied making the promise, saying he had only said that rates would always be lower under the coalition than under Labor.

But he conceded that the promise was made in a Liberal Party ad which aired for two nights early in the 2004 campaign, before being withdrawn.

He refused to say who pulled the ad or why.

But with the Reserve Bank poised to lift rates next month, for the sixth time since the 2004 election, he urged voters not to consider what he said three years ago, but to look to the future under a Labor government.”

You will note that Howard “conceded that the promise was made in a Liberal Party ad which aired for two nights early in the 2004 campaign”. You will also note, that in my comment, which you stated was “lies”, I referred to the “Liberal party campaign at the 2004 election”

Maybe, you are not embarassed, but you are well and truly caught out making false accusations on “lies” … which I suppose is tantamount to you lying, isn’t it?

A Liberal Party ad, JS. Was it written and authorised by the great JWH, or was he accepting responsibility for a party communications mistake ? Something great leaders do.

I’ll leave it to you to prove any sort of false accusation.

@Penfold
Well, it doesn’t really matter who authorised said ad – it was aired in 2004, and even though it was withdrawn, there was never a correction or “we got it wrong” before the election. And just over 1 month after the admission by Howard, in 2007, that the assertion re record interest rates was wrong, Howard was out of his PM job – and like Dutton, was also turfed out by his own electorate. Great unemployed leaders.

As for false accusations:
‘Penfold: 3:31 pm 07 May 25 “Speaking of lies, JWH never said that.”
… if that’s not a false accusation of lies, perhaps you can point to the post which states, I attributed the Liberal Campaign policy to JWH.

Great JS, so we both agree JWH didn’t say that. So what was your point again ?

@Penfold
Oh my point is so simple.

As we’ve agreed, neither of us said that JWH promised he would keep interests rates at record lows, you lied, when you accused me of lying about it.

I know you will never admit to your lie, nevertheless, I’ll accept the apology, that should be forthcoming, anyway.

No doubt, having been caught out, you will simply disappear from this thread – which is fine.

Capital Retro11:34 am 08 May 25

You’ve been cancelled, Penfold.

Lol JS, perhaps if you’re going to accuse me of lying you could point out where. But it’s nice that you’ve worked out JWH was a wonderful leader.

Btw what’s worse, being called a liar or delusional ? You love throwing those terms around. It generally means your argument has failed.

CR – yes there’s a lot of cancelling that goes on. Followed by uncancelling. Go figure. Some people just can’t stand opinions and facts which fall outside narrow world views.

@Penfold
Making a false accusation that someone has lied, is in itself a lie. Are you now saying you didn’t accuse me of lying about JWH’s words?
Hint: As I pointed out earlier, look for your post commencing: “Speaking of lies….” I can’t wait to see your spin on that one.

I’m not sure which is worse, a liar or delusional, Penfold. Given you’ve been called both, I’ll look to you for the answer.

It’s okay JS, I’ve worked it out. When I made the statement “JWH never said that”, you took that as accusingly you of lying. Consider it a bit like accusing JWH of lying, then slipping in a quick reference to a campaign advert 21 years ago. Slippery isn’t it.

So sure I’ll apologise. Humblest apologies for writing something that was hard for you to understand. Again.

But JS there’s no simple answer there. Besides liar and delusional there’s been confused, inability to comprehend, supercilious piffle, foolish, the list goes on.

Do you ever reflect on some of your more delightful errr…. personality assessments ? Trump had a word for it, something about swamps.

As Kermit knows, it’s not easy being green

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.