6 January 2026

Labor pressure on PM to call a royal commission into Bondi attack

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
44
man in a suit stands at a lectern

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is refusing to call a Commonwealth royal commission into the Bondi terrorist attack. Photo: Thomas Lucraft.

Anthony Albanese is under increased pressure to call a royal commission into antisemitism and the circumstances that led to the Bondi Beach terrorist shootings.

But the Prime Minister is so far remaining steadfast in his opposition to staging a federal inquiry, saying his government will instead fully cooperate with the NSW Government’s royal commission.

Mr Albanese has also commissioned a federal review of the nation’s security and policing agencies.

Federal Parliament is also likely to return a week earlier than the scheduled first week of February to deal with hate law and gun control reforms in the wake of the tragedy.

A group of former Labor Party MPs and high-profile members of the Labor Israel Action Committee (LIAC) has written an open letter calling on the PM to hold a federal royal commission.

“The government must call a royal commission into the causes of the Bondi Beach massacre, the broader ecosystem of terror and hate and the capacity of the agencies to monitor terrorist threats,” their letter says.

“We commend NSW Premier Chris Minns for calling a NSW royal commission but such a commission cannot compel institutions and individuals beyond its jurisdiction to give evidence or provide Commonwealth officers with the necessary legal protection to speak frankly.

“Only a Commonwealth royal commission can unpack the dynamics of Jew hatred including aspects such as the social media threat, how hate and incitement is weaponised in Australia and how we can come together across the nation to defeat it.”

READ ALSO Auslan On-Demand now available across the Services Australia network

The signatories include former minister Mike Kelly, former federal Labor MPs Bernie Ripoll and Michael Danby, former NSW state Labor MPs Walt Secord, Michael Costa and Eric Roozendaal, as well as former Labor senator and Olympian Nova Peris, who is a patron of LIAC.

Ms Peris was also among the 60-plus signatories to a previous letter from high-profile athletes calling on the Prime Minister to hold a federal royal commission into the Bondi attack.

Business groups, former High Court chief justice Robert French and the Jewish community have also called for a federal commission.

Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley continues to turn up the heat, demanding a Commonwealth royal commission as the only satisfactory course of action.

She said returning to Parliament before the 3 February scheduled date was nothing compared with what should be done.

“I just want to make it clear that if we do come back early, it’s actually not early,” Ms Ley told the Today show on Tuesday (6 January).

“We should have come back to Parliament in the days before Christmas to deal with this terror event, this worst-ever terrorist event on Australian soil.

“And the Prime Minister does need to yield to the calls … He called for unity. He now has unity across this country.

“Every day, more and more decent Australians are stepping up. We’ve had sporting legends, business leaders, former governors-general, defence and intelligence chiefs, and many, many millions of ordinary Australians.

“And the question is … what is the Prime Minister hiding? What is going on? And why is he not listening to so many Australians?

“So, yes, he does need to call this Commonwealth royal commission, because it’s the only way we can get the answers in this country that people are calling out for, into the actual event itself, but also into the scourge of antisemitism in every corner of Australia.”

READ ALSO Defence handed first-ever Commonwealth employer penalty for psychological harm death

Mr Albanese insists he wants answers sooner than a royal commission would be able to deliver them, which is why his review of security agencies, to be led by former ASIO boss Dennis Richardson, will report in April.

He said the Federal Government was taking strong action against hate speech and antisemetic crimes.

“What we are prioritising is the immediate needs of the Richardson review …,” he said on Tuesday.

“I want to see an Australia that is united. I want to see an Australia where someone, because of their faith, is not targeted but is able to practise their faith and with pride …

“I continue to be engaged with leaders in the Jewish community and I am talking and meeting on a daily basis with people to make sure we do everything that is possible.

“As I have said, we need to promote unity at this time and that is my focus.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

44
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A RC can’t be held until after the legal proceedings against the shooter are completed, as ruled previously by the High Court 85 years ago. Also, running two RCs at the same time would be a monumental waste of money.

All those calling for a RC, the MSM, Murdoch press being the prominent one, along with Advance Australia, 60 out of 100’s of former sportspeople, the LNP remnants, plus a number of unrepresentative organisations, clamoring for attention. These calls have nothing to do with what happened at Bondi but, is obviously an orchestrated attack on the PM, by those politically opposed to him and the ALP. Yes, I know a small group of former ALP MPs have spoken out but, take a look at their post Parliamentary actions: Nova Peris went to Israel, and has vilified Muslims a number of times, Mike Kelly joined Palantir (check them out).

People need to look beyond the MSM news outlets, check the independent news organisations in Australia to get a clear picture of what’s happening, rather than news biased by billionaires interests.

Let’s take a look at the track record of previous royal commissions. Does the government implement many of the recommendations and in a timely manner? Not really. Does it hold anyone to account for their actions? Not really. Does it put an objective truth on the public record? Not really. Does it look good and give the populace the impression of something being done? Yes. Does it create a false impression that an issue is resolved without actually resolving it? Yes, move along….there is surely no more police corruption in NSW, right? Right?!?

I was previously against the idea but honestly let’s just go for it, get it over and done with. And the next time something like this happens, we can blame the perpetrators and the failings of law enforcement instead.

Stephen Saunders4:41 am 07 Jan 26

Penfold, mate, be careful what you wish for. Under Albanese, a Royal Commission could only serve to further validate “multicultural” mass migration. In poll after poll, this is not what voters want.

How do you figure mass migration might be validated SS ?

Migration of those with mindsets at odds with Australian values might likely to be found to be one of the indirect and underlying issues potentially.

The Royal Commission can call Netanyahu as a witness.

He can explain why anti semitism exploded world wide after his army killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians.

Answer: Barbaric attacks carried out by Hamas took the lives of 1219 people and taking of 251 hostages. It is believed that 66%, or more, Palestinian civilians supported the attack. All they had to do was return the hostages.

So killing 70,000 people in retaliation for 1500 deaths sounds fair then.

HiddenDragon9:30 pm 06 Jan 26

Aside from ministers who have been wheeled out to deliver performances which have looked more like hostage videos, the only respectable public support thus far for Albanese has come from Robert Richter –

“The tragedy at Bondi was the result of a stuff-up by ASIO in not red-flagging the man for overseas travel or anything of the kind, red-flagging his father,” Richter told The Sydney Morning Herald. “It was a complete stuff-up by a combination of ASIO, the federal police, NSW Police and border control. We don’t need a royal commission for that.”

Beyond that, the public opposition to a Royal Commission has, to put it very bluntly, boiled down to a latter day, euphemised rendition of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

When, presumably, the Richardson review gently points out that the problems are now so pervasive and entrenched that ASIO et.al. could not possibly – as suggested by Richter – keep a sufficiently close watch on all potential dangers, Albanese might finally admit the need to look at all the causes, not just the symptoms.

The dawning latter possibility is presumably why we started hearing, late today, that a Royal Commission has “not been ruled out”.

Maybe the Royal Commission can call Netanyahu as a witness.

He can explain why anti semitism ramped up after his army blew up tens of thousands of Palestinians.

If Albanese called a Royal Commission, the same people whinging now would then just change tack to whinge about its terms of reference.

The pure political posturing has absolutely zero to do with finding systemic problems or reducing risks to society as our resident fool has already confirmed below.

Once again you are so right Penfold,but you forgot few other bodies like the Israeli Government Mossad and the brave Australian Jews who just come back after serving in the Israeli Defence force ?!?Australians need to know who is behind the constant attack on Albo?

On the right side of Royal Commission support:

* Bondi victims families
* Australian sports people
* Australian business leaders
* Eminent Australians
* The Judiciary
* Former ALP politicians
* Australian business groups
* Former national security government leaders
* Historical precedent

On the other side of Royal Commission support:

* Anthony Albanese
(and we all know why)
_________________________________

It’s not hard to work out which side represents Australia’s national interests.

Notably the first polls have come out and Albanese is getting belted.

So Prime Minister, who will you support – Australians or yourself ?

Chris Mossad Minns has already got a royal commission in the works. What do you think would be different in a federal one?
I would argue a NSW royal commission would provide more favourable recommendations to your cause.

What historical precedent? Like the RC after Port Arthur; the Lindt Cafe; Christchurch massacre; the Bondi Junction stabbings; the handling of the 2019/2020 bushfires? Or are you referring to the LNP being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Robodebt RC; institutional child abuse; aged care, the banking industry etc etc etc? The LNP does not have a history of supporting Royal Commissions, apart when there was political point scoring to be made.

As far as the families supporting it, was it explained to them that any RC will have to wait until the criminal proceedings are finished so nothing interferes the concept of a fair trial? Do you think the families would be happy if the trial(s) fell over because of a failure to follow due process?

TG – the first and most obvious difference is that the NSW RC can’t call non-NSW resources. A Federal RC can call anyone and compel them to respond. NSW can’t enforce any commonwealth bodies to respond.

Perhaps you should ask yourself this – why are so many Australians from far and wide stepping up and demanding a Royal Commission ? Demanding the public is provided answers ? Do you think it might be so we can seek to prevent this happening again ?

Albo’s very lame enquiry (though at least with the respected Richardson at the helm) has no interest in asking why this happened. Only what happened. And what didn’t happen.

The why is critical because of the clear escalation of antisemitism in Australia over two years. The protests, the hate speech, the synagogue attacks, the university demonstrations, the government support of Palestine and attacks on Israel have all created a culture enabling antisemitism. The Jewish community has warned for two years about the growing risks of attacks.

As for “causes”, is seeking answers to the worst terror attack on Australian soil a cause ? Or perhaps it’s what any rational human response would be. But if it’s a cause, then refer to the long list of Aussies demanding one. It’s a national cause. Except for a few people with something to hide.

A fair trial megsy, innocent before proven guilty.

Sounds like you’re either in deep denial or haven’t seen the before, during and after videos and photos that millions of Aussies have.

But to tease out your comment, how do you expect to get 12 jurors appointed who haven’t seen footage ?

Anyway the good news is Albanese is working out his leadership will be over if he doesn’t call a RC so expect an announcement soon.

I wouldn’t say it is necessarily that many Australians calling for it. They are overwhelmingly online and vocal about it, that much is true. Most saying it don’t even know what it means to have a royal commission.
What are the terms of reference? Bondi attack specifically, antisemitism in general or looking for grounds to dismiss our elected politicians? If you think our politicians who acknowledge the existence of a retaliatory genocide as the root cause of the attack, let me put this to you: you yourself are more to blame. Albo never justified violence as an answer to solve a dispute but you have, on several occasions. Remember october 7? Do you remember justifying the killing of babies “because their parents are hamas and they will grow up to be hamas”? I warned you then that if society wants to lower that bar, it will have dire consequence. And here we are.

Not sure what you’re babbling on about TG but it sure sounds like a case of head-in-sand if you’re trying to blame Israel and are unaware of the national mood.

Maybe those Aussie values are a foreign concept.

Yeah you really did miss the point if you think I’m trying to blame israel. No, I’m blaming you, Penfold, for justifying violence as an answer.

“The national mood”…. what nonsense. Is that what sky news are calling it?

Calling for the dismissal of elected politicians at the behest of a foreign leader’s interests, that’s some good ol’ fashioned Aussie values is it? Turning someone’s grief into political point scoring before the body is even cold, true blue aussie values hey?

Penfold, whether you or I think the alleged shooter is irrelevant. I agree there is overwhelming evidence, but that is not the issue. There is a legal process to go through and if it is not followed, alleged criminals can have their case dismissed. In addition, there are potentially other people who may face prosecution, such as anyone who aided the alleged gunmen. Do you want to derail any prosecution against them?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.