13 March 2025

Labor's David Smith can't rest on his margin as electoral climate heats up

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
68
woman with cheering supporters

Independent Jessie Price and her supporters. Labor is taking her challenge seriously. Photo: Voices for Bean.

Is the orange tide about to swamp Labor’s David Smith in Bean?

The numbers say not likely, but David Pocock defied the odds in 2022 to banish Zed Seselja and deny the Liberals any representation in the Parliament.

Granted, Pocock was an exceptional candidate, and his rugby background didn’t hurt, but it was also the beginning of the volatility that now characterises the electoral landscape.

His former staffer, Thomas Emerson, is now an independent in the Legislative Assembly after contesting a seat studded with party leaders.

READ ALSO Human Rights Commission marks five-year COVID anniversary with report on collateral damage

Last federal election, David Smith retained Bean with a primary vote of 41 per cent and personal swing of 3.59 per cent and a two-party preferred swing of 5.43 per cent for a sizable margin of 12.9 per cent.

That’s a fair buffer.

But community independent Jessie Price, a former journalist and midwife, is unfazed, as are her enthusiastic orange-clad supporters who can be seen waving placards at motorists on the busy morning commute.

She has received some funding from Climate 200, which bankrolled the Pocock push and is expected to hand over a bit more for the soon-to-start official campaign.

Last week, Climate 200 founder Simon Holmes a Court told the National Press Club that Climate 200 polling gave Price a good chance of toppling Smith.

That may be due to the poll questions and be self-serving, but it will give the Price campaign a fillip.

David Smith, second from left, in the Labor lineup for the light rail Stage 2A sod turning. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Smith is considered vulnerable because of a perceived lack of visibility in the electorate, a general antipathy towards incumbency, especially with higher interest rates and the rising cost of living, and the Albanese Government’s cautious climate policies.

Price, presenting a fresh face and oodles of energy, is hoping to win over disenchanted Labor voters and Liberals who back the energy transition but won’t countenance moving to the left.

Cost of living, housing, health care, climate change, plus more infrastructure on the south side of Canberra are her priorities.

She considers a minority government would be a great result because it would give the likes of her more bargaining power from the crossbench – and better results for Bean.

Labor is ramping up the risk factor of this approach. Last week Chief Minister Andrew Barr laced his otherwise mundane State of the Territory speech with warnings about what a Dutton government would mean to the ACT’s economy and infrastructure program.

Having Anthony Albanese in the Lodge has made life a whole lot easier for the ACT in working with the Commonwealth to jointly fund projects, and Labor’s policy settings have strengthened Canberra’s economy.

The message was clear – a Coalition government would put all this at risk. And he didn’t even mention Dutton’s proposed public service cuts, leaving that to Finance Minister and ACT Senator Katy Gallagher.

READ ALSO Pocock urges government to adopt committee’s recommendations for helping the poor

While Barr didn’t refer to independents, the implication was that a Price victory would be one less Labor seat and that could be crucial to who sits on the government benches. But it could also help the Liberal candidate, army veteran David Lamerton, pull off a boilover.

That’s Smith’s warning to voters too.

However, in an electoral environment where grievance is rewarded, incumbency is ignored, and energy can melt numbers, it may not be enough.

Smith has been in every infrastructure photo-op recently, but he will need to do some old-fashioned flesh pressing and doorknocking to let people know he isn’t taking their votes for granted. We may even see him on the side of the road with a placard.

Join the conversation

68
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
GrumpyGrandpa7:20 pm 21 Mar 25

People are saying they have no idea who Mr Smith is, or that they’re never seen him.

I’ve seen him. I saw him a couple of weeks ago. It was 5pm. He was in his car, leaving the office.

Gregg Heldon10:54 am 24 Mar 25

That’s David Attenborough level of nature spotting, GG.
Well done.

Peter Curtis5:21 pm 18 Mar 25

That photograph if the ALP line-up says everything about why you shouldn’t vote for any associated with that bunch of incompetents. Most especially Steele and Barr. They couldn’t dig a ditch.

David Smith is no Zed Seselja and this campaign will be an interesting contest to watch. I am expecting the same staged media appearances from David Pocock, complete with matching clothes that we saw when he was spruiking Thomas Emerson in the ACT election and we will now see for Emerson sister-in-law Jessie Price as she takes on David Smith in Bean.

Are the bats out and is there a mood for change in Bean? The six Teal candidates who spectacularly won the 2022 election ousting Liberal Party stalwarts from their safe blue-ribbon seats in NSW, Victoria and WA are also from the conservative side of politics, taking a more moderate and centrist position on social issues than the Liberals under Abbott, Morrison and Dutton. A grouping of Liberal women who generally share the same socially progressive values including political integrity and accountability and increased action on climate change. Their voting records however have been very different.

As with previous Liberal governments, Dutton has been just as relentless in his quest to win by Canberra bashing. Putting down our city, undermining public servants and their WFH agreements and demanding that they get back to work. Promising to take an axe to the public service and its workforce by slashing 36,000 jobs and relocating government agencies should he win government.

Will Ms Price be inside or outside the tent on social and economic issues, or will she have the clout as an independent in the lower house in protecting the integrity of our city and its public servants from the chopping block, or any other policy which will negatively affect our citizens should she and the Liberals be elected?

@Jack D.
“… the same staged media appearances from David Pocock, complete with matching clothes that we saw when he was spruiking Thomas Emerson in the ACT election …”

It obviously worked!

I live in Bean. I get trying to target safe Labor seats, but of the three Canberra seats, I’d think a Teal would have more success in the seat of Canberra than Bean. (Unless there is another minor party option, I will be voting informal at this election. David Smith is completely useless, Price sounds awful too.)

The second photo has a whole lot of sods in it. The minute a politician (particularly Barr or Gallagher….but you can put the other lot in there too) tell me not to vote for anyone else but them I automatically switch off. Both side promise a lot but deliver little. If I cant find a suitable candidate to vote for on the basis of their policies (not ideology) then I will be paying my $20.

Smith, Smith who, oh was he parachuted in as well.

Malcolm Bourke9:14 am 19 Mar 25

Has a house and a family in the electorate but believe what you will

Smith appears every 3.9 years and asks for everyone’s vote. He does absolutely zero in between elections because it’s such a safe seat. It’s time to see him out the door

What amuses me is that Smith shares the same conservative Catholic beliefs as Zed Seselja (being a former disciple of ultra-conservative Catholic and Opus Dei member, Joe de Bruyn) but has copped none of the stick that Zed received from Labor supporters. I’m no fan of either, but there seems to be some hypocrisy here. Smith is basically another Zed, only he keeps invisible and toes the party line.

It’s fair point that they share similar beliefs largely not in step with the electorate. But I disagree that lack of “stick” from the electorate is hypocrisy.

I think the issue was Zed was very visible in pushing his views on the electorate regardless of what the electorate wanted, where as Smith as several people have pointed has been completely invisible (I actually thought he was a much younger bloke until I saw the picture above).

You’re right though they both vote the party line; and neither of the have championed Canberra or anything to with fixing the large structural issues this country faces.

Indeed one of Australia’s all too few value added exports and a major employer in the ACT is education. So where was Smith on the stupidity of capping foreign students? Sure put policy in place to ensure an Australian degree doesn’t become a default pathway to citizenship, add a levy to fund Aussie students if that’s a genuine problem but why stop people coming here for four years and spending tonne of money? It beggars belief.

I am so done with the major parties and the invisible Mr. Smith can go, and one less out of touch ultra-conservative Catholic in the parliament is good news as far as I’m concerned.

@Jayce
Yes, except, Smith voted in favour of the Restoring Territory Rights Bill in 2022 – allowing ACT LA to legislate on VAD.

It’s worth noting that voting for this bill, was not along party lines but a free (“conscience”), yet despite his religious leanings, Smith honoured the wishes of a majority of voters in his electorate. That’s why Seselja is no longer a Senator for ACT – he let his religious views override his “representation” (or lack thereof) of his constituency.

Nevertheless, like Seano, I am done with major parties, and so I will not be at all sad, to see Smith’s demise to this independent, if it happens, at the next election.

Zed was very active and actually did things for Canberra. Not sure where Smith is.

When you are active you become a target. Activism is the strength of the Labor party. They’ll get you to hate someone and then make you think it was grass roots.

Zed did basically nothing more than labor in pushing views. However his views were religious where labors were woke progressive. Its easier to bash religious views when they are the minority. Thats how they got away with taking over the hospital, at a time when they were over of budget and the CHS has terrible culture.

Any government is always better after they haven’t been in power.
If you want a good Lib gov. vote for them.
If you want a good lab gov that isn’t invisible, don’t let them take your vote for granted.

At least pocock shows you which way he voted.

Smith should have been an advocate for Canberra in the NBN, we’re targeting 60% access for fibre, where the rest of Aus is 90%. We’re not a hard place to install it, but because inner north is that 60% they don’t care about the rest of us.

“Yes, except, Smith voted in favour of the Restoring Territory Rights Bill in 2022 – allowing ACT LA to legislate on VAD.”

Thanks JustSaying, that’s quite something in his favour considering personal beliefs so kudos to him for that.

“Zed was very active and actually did things for Canberra.”…lol no.

Seano. You carried on elsewhere I. This thread about someone not posting a reasoned argument. Your reasoning is terrible.

ROBERT INGLE1:00 pm 17 Mar 25

David Smith? He has collected probably $700000 in wages to represent me in the last 3 years and his representation has been dismal. I don’t care who wins the seat. Nobody could be as lazy as him. The people of BEAN, I know he has Labor after his name, please don’t blindly vote for him.

Gregg Heldon12:25 pm 17 Mar 25

Smith is very invisible. I’ve never seen him out and about. We get a newsletter from him once every six months, in our letterbox, in Greenway.
That’s it.
He claims he does a lot in his newsletter, but so do most pollies.

So Gregg what do you actually want him to do?

Gregg Heldon5:10 pm 17 Mar 25

Be visible. Door knock. Have meet and greet at shopping centres. Talk to people. Listen to people. You know, like other pollies do.

He did make a guest appearance at Phillip pool recently

David Smith ??????

Talk about keeping a low profile – I’ve never heard of him

What has Smith done for Canberra? Genuine question.

Bloke has been entirely invisible.

The major parties and the vested interests that control them do not want to fix the major issues facing this country either because they’re too hard, or they don’t care or it benefits them not to.

The only way to get the majors to stop taking us for granted is to vote for sensible (ie. not Clive) independents.

Roll on a minority government.

“Sensible independents”, that’s funny !

Yeah that the rusted ons and culture warriors don’t like sensible independents is another reason to vote for them.

Capital Retro7:46 am 17 Mar 25

At least one house in Tuggeranong already displaying electoral signs for both Pocock and Price.
Sort of says it all.

That you’ve got nothing other than whinging? Yes it does.

Capital Retro9:16 am 17 Mar 25

Did you sleep in this morning, Seano?
I expected your predictable response at least 30 minutes earlier.

@Capital Retro
I guess you can infer that the residents of that house with vote for Price and Pocock, CR.

Other than the fact that they propose to vote differently to you, do you have anything relevant to contribute?

Your obsession with me is sad, your inability form a cogent argument on any issue let alone why people shouldn’t vote for sensible independents is sadder.

Capital Retro11:35 am 17 Mar 25

You should try stand-up comedy, Seano.

You should try reasoned argument based on data & evidence, Capital.

Capital Retro2:40 pm 17 Mar 25

Yeah, would you like me to say I made that up about the signs so I sign a confession and the state then sends me to a gulag?
And while the candidates may be “sensible” they are certainly NOT independents.

“Yeah, would you like me to say I made that up about the signs so I sign a confession and the state then sends me to a gulag?”

I’ve read this 3 times and have no idea what you’re talking about. I suspect a tinfoil hat is required to interpret this statement.

‘And while the candidates may be “sensible” they are certainly NOT independents.’

They actually are independent, your parroting of this tired coalition talking point only only highlights that the only non-independent in this conversation is you Capital.

@Capital Retro
Really, CR, how long are you going to sit on your perch, and squawk about candidates, who are not members of any major political parties, being “NOT independents”?
Note: Pocock ran under the David Pocock Party, to enable ‘above the line’ voting at the last election, but that’s a technical matter, and does not impact his independence from any other party in the Parliament.

This vacuous stance from you, may play well with others of your ilk, but to those who are seriously considering voting for such candidates, it’s just tiresome hyperbole.

Capital Retro5:35 pm 17 Mar 25

Do you share the same cage with Seano, JS?
How can political candidates who are funded massively by people with vested interests in the status quo be called “independent”?
Polly want a cracker?

“How can political candidates who are funded massively by people with vested interests in the status quo be called “independent”?”

Because…they’re not. You really need to stop getting your “information” from the daily coalition talking points they’re tediously wrong.

I know you don’t deal in facts because they have the pesky way of getting in the way of arguments someone else has written for you but the vast bulk of Climate 200 funding comes from ordinary Australians. Ordinary Australians who are rightly concerned about the futures of their kids and grandkids.

“Polly want a cracker?” no I want you to get a clue.

@Capital Retro
Yes – it seems Seano and I are in sync when it comes to your squawking, CR.

All politicians are funded in some way – it’s how they get elected … or in the case of your man, Seselja – it’s just a waste of the backers money.

Nevertheless, I’ll ask you the same question I’ve asked you previously, and other parrots from your same flock, who also incessantly squawk from their perch “Independents are bought …squawk … independents are bought”:
Why don’t you provide evidence of specific legislation, that independents, like Pocock, have introduced or shephered through the parliament, which have financially or otherwise benefitted their backers?

Provide an evidenced based answer … and then CR gets his cracker.

“All politicians are funded in some way – it’s how they get elected … or in the case of your man, Seselja – it’s just a waste of the backers money.”

Yes I was going to make this point too. In Capital’s world major funding from unions is ok (well maybe not) and business interests is also Ok and definitely does not buy influence but minor funding from Aussie mums, dads and grandparents concerned about the future for their kids for independents is some sort of outrage that comes with huge strings attached.

IDK that Capital is unaware of his hypocrisy here, I just don’t think he (much like Trump) cares about the truth which is a sad way to be.

“Provide an evidenced based answer … and then CR gets his cracker.”

lol

Capital Retro9:08 am 18 Mar 25

“Yes I was going to make this point too”, said Seano referring to something that his colleague JustSaying said which proves they do live share the same cage.

Capital Retro9:13 am 18 Mar 25

Boundless Earth, a climate group chaired by Mr Farquhar’s business partner Mike Cannon-Brookes, donated to Climate 200 and pro-climate action candidates, including Senator Pocock and independent candidate Jack Dempsey. In total, the donations came to about $1.18 million.

Sigh Capital.

Sensible people can agree with each other, this isn’t the clever own you think it is.

The vast majority of Climate 200 funding comes from small donors, this is on the public record. You cherry picking individual donors whilst ignoring the large contributions to the LNP from vested interests is pathetic.

Capital Retro11:09 am 18 Mar 25

You are a gullible fool, Seono but credit where credit is due as you are doing a great job for the people who employ you.

Capital Retro12:08 pm 18 Mar 25

Yes Seano, small donors indeed. I would like you to name the ones allegedly made to the LNP.
A Mr Catsaras, who is a climate and energy market-focused trader, donated $999,978 to Climate 200 in 2023-24, marking the second year in a row that he and a Mr Keldoulis have given about $1 million each to the group.
Atlassian founders Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquhar, with wife Kim Jackson, donated more than $1 million each to Climate 200 in 2021-22 to make them the biggest backers in that election year.
Simon Holmes à Court founded Climate 200 before the 2019 election.
Donations from him and his family foundation hit $250,000 in 2021-22 and $200,000 in 2022-23. A donation from Mr Holmes à Court for 2023-24 has yet to be disclosed.

“You are a gullible fool, Seono but credit where credit is due as you are doing a great job for the people who employ you.”

You literally have not put up one sensible argument, not one….and I’m a “gullible” and a “fool”….lol….keep calling names from behind your keyboard champion…

Some heroes don’t wear capes.

“Yes Seano, small donors indeed” Yep. Thousands of ordinary mums, dads and grandparents.

https://www.climate200.com.au/our-donors

But while you ignore billionaires like Rinehart pumping money into the LNP because only some donations are bad in your cooked view, thousands of ordinary Australians supporting many different independents isn’t the crime you your cut and paste from Telegram pretends it is.

Grow up champ.

@Capital Retro
Here’s some other figures for you on overall spending at the 2022 election:
#1 – The Coalition ($132m)
#2 – Clive Palmer’s UAP ($123m)
#3 – ALP ($116m)
… – Teals and other individuals combined ($21m)

On the matter of individual donations. after Clive Palmer’s ludicrously expensive outlay for his lame duck’s success, there was Anthony Pratt’s paper and packaging company, Pratt Holdings, at $3.7m – more or less split evenly between the Coalition and Labor … essentially an each way bet.

Pratt surpassed the unions, and was the largest individual donor to Labor. However, his donation paled, when compared to the Coalition’s $3.9m from the Cormack Foundation (the Liberal Party’s investment arm).

So, including the figures you provided, what does it alll mean? That a lot of rich b*st*rds have far too much money!

Oh and I’m still waiting for you to provide evidence, of specific legislation, that independents have introduced or shephered through the parliament, which have financially or otherwise benefitted their backers?

Capital Retro4:10 pm 18 Mar 25

OK, I will concede that you are a gullible hero then.

“OK, I will concede that you are a gullible hero then.”

You’re making less and less sense Capital.

If it’s OK for billionaires to donate to parties you support why is it wrong for the ordinary Australians who make up the vast majority of climate to 200 funding to donate to independents through them?

Please explain why one is OK and one isn’t without sounding silly or like a hypocrite.

Capital Retro6:23 pm 18 Mar 25

Seano, I do not financially support any political parties nor am I a member of any quasi political parties like Climate 200, GetUp etc.
I used to be a Liberal and I still have conservative values.
When did you become a Neo Marxist?
Your spin about billionaires who support conservatives being to different to the ones who support independents through the quasi parties I have referred to is totally disingenuous.
I am making a lot of sense Seano otherwise you wouldn’t be criticizing what I say.

“Seano, I do not financially support….blah, blah”….IDC.

“When did you become a Neo Marxist?”…grow up.

“Your spin about billionaires who support conservatives being to different to the ones who support independents through the quasi parties I have referred to is totally disingenuous.”

What’s disingenuous is the way you misrepresent this argument. Climate 200 are not primarily funded by billionaires no matter how many times you make this false claim. It’s a coalition talking point, so you can claim to be non-partisan but this is clearly a nonsense.

“I am making a lot of sense…” no you’re not, if you were you wouldn’t be called out constantly.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.