13 November 2025

Liberals dump net-zero commitment following party infighting and marathon meetings

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
82
Leader of the Australian Liberal Party, Sussan Ley MP

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has dumped the Liberal Party’s commitment to net zero. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The Liberal Party will dump its commitment to net zero, following the shadow ministry’s decision made during its specially convened four-hour meeting on Thursday morning (13 November).

The group is backtracking on the Coalition’s agreement to the legislated net-zero carbon emissions goal by 2050, but says it will officially remain in the Paris Agreement.

To do so, the party will set five-year targets through the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) mechanism, provided the Coalition returns to government.

NDCs are climate action plans submitted by countries under the Paris Agreement to outline their goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and how they plan to continue adapting to the impacts of climate change.

The Liberal leadership group agreed to remove net zero from the Climate Change Act if they are reelected, and also repeal Labor’s 2030 emissions reduction target.

Net zero will now be totally removed from the Liberal Party’s policy platform.

The position has delighted many in the party but has upset moderates who argued to keep the commitment.

Bizarrely, individual Liberals will be allowed to talk up the benefits of Australia reaching its net zero targets – while also acknowledging that it is not part of their party’s platform.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley confirmed the outcome of the meeting on Thursday afternoon.

“Australians deserve affordable energy and responsible emissions reduction. And the Liberal Party believes we can do both. But affordable energy must come first,” she said.

Ms Ley said Labor’s energy policy was not a transition but a “demolition job”, adding that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was lying to Australians by saying he was bringing energy prices down under his plan.

“We remain committed to the Paris Agreement and to doing our fair share to reduce emissions. But we will do it in a way that protects households and budgets and keeps our economy strong,” Ley says.

Nuclear energy also remains a live option for the Coalition.

READ ALSO Generative AI to be used by everyone involved in government work

Thursday’s meeting follows a five-hour session the day before, during which all Liberal MPs and Senators aired their views on the net-zero target.

In that gathering, while there was no formal vote, a majority expressed opposition to the climate change commitment.

About two-thirds of the 49 attendees spoke out to turn their backs on net zero.

This week’s meetings have been seen as a test for Ms Ley’s leadership.

The Nationals have already withdrawn their support for net zero, placing the Opposition Leader in a difficult position to reach a Coalition consensus on energy policy.

The meetings were not previously planned but were hastily scheduled due to pressure sparked by the Nationals’ move and increased rumblings from within the Liberals.

A negotiating meeting with the Nationals is scheduled for late on Sunday (16 November).

Staunch anti-net-zero Nationals Senator Matt Canavan will be leading the junior Coalition party’s negotiations in the Sunday meeting.

Government and crossbench MPs and Senators have already begun publicly condemning the Liberals’ decision, while the Nationals are applauding it.

READ ALSO Stunning photos of aurora australis captured by local photographer

Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said the Liberals are choosing to take Australia backwards and walk away from Australian jobs and a bipartisan commitment.

“And what they have done is create uncertainty in business investment, and that means uncertainty when it comes to job growth,” the minister said.

“But our government will not be deterred. We are getting on with the job of investing in cheaper renewable energies, backed up by gas.

“We have an energy plan; they just have division and chaos.”

The Climate Council has described the backflip on net zero as a “dangerous retreat” that could lead to a spike in both pollution and power bills.

Chief executive officer Amanda McKenzie said the decision will also have negative implications for the Coalition politically.

“It’s deadly negligence that would leave Australians facing more fires, floods and heatwaves, while hiking up power bills for Aussie families,” she said.

“After a decade of denial, distraction and delay, the Coalition still doesn’t get it – you can’t win elections by ignoring voters who want meaningful climate action.

“If the Coalition keeps undermining the environment and the economy, they’re heading for net zero seats.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

82
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Tony Mansfield2:31 pm 14 Nov 25

Reading the wording of the statement – – – none of it makes appealing sense – it’s just a statement of principle to put reducing energy bills before cutting emissions, but not a word on how, not a policy not a plan. Of course we don’t like high cost energy but there’s a cost of transitioning and the current government approach is more sensible and an attempt at a holistic response to the complexity of what we face. That’s why the majority support it. The Libs and Nats try to reduce it down to a black and white argument over NZ, still they are on about ideology instead of presenting a sensible solution we could vote for. The logic behind harnessing natural energy to assist climate defence leaves the logic of nuclear or coal for dead.

HiddenDragon9:21 pm 13 Nov 25

In the perception of many, today’s announcement by the Liberals amounts to an attack on the forms, symbols, rhetoric and dogma of what has become, in effect, a state religion.

It was heresy, apostasy and shocking iconoclasm all rolled into one for the believers – the head explosions and accompanying angry “yes, buts” and “whatabouts” from the Canberra press gallery made that clear enough.

After a shaky start, Ley quickly found her feet and did a very solid, forthright job of pushing back against the inevitable lines of attack and double standards from a media which has conveniently moved on from the broken $275 power bill reduction promise and seems generally uninterested in the gap between what other countries promise and what they actually do (even if you believe their official figures).

The ultimate political success or failure of this change of direction will largely depend on the state of household finances in middle Australia by the time of the next election.

If things only gets worse (quite possible, given the now likely trajectory of interest rates and the state of public finances across the country), the votes for “punching above our weight” and saving the planet will diminish accordingly, but even in that event, the advocates for this change will need to hold their nerve and not take a backward step in debate.

LMAO are you seriously trying to push Ley caving to the far right as sign of strengthen Not So Hidden Agenda? Lol…she’ll be lucky if she’s still leader at Christmas.

As it is there are 17 moderates who are all going to start thinking about their long term futures and preservation in a party that no longer reflects rational positions on climate and energy, let alone the rest of the crazy that they’re going to have to defend from the far right fringe that has captured the party.

Good post HD. You can tell by the frenzied gyrations of the net zero zombies that this change in policy has hit a real nerve in the same way net zero is hitting our hip pockets.

None of that is true Penfold.

The copeium as the Liberals effectively lock out moderates from the party and guarantee that at the very least the Teals will hold their seats and likely add more is quite delicious.

You and the very online, very uninformed, IPA/Skynews watching far right have managed to turn the Federal Liberals into the Canberra Liberals and I’m sure they’ll be every bit as successful…kudos.

I was reminded by an article this morning of Whitlam’s speech to ideological zealots in the ALP in the late 1960s, “Certainly the impotent are pure”.

That is now the position of the LNP, captured by the ideological right but with a hopelessly bad leader who thinks self-preservation for as long as possible is her highest calling, stuff the nation. No doubt her replacement will be pure. My bet is on a Gina-backed Hastie result.

How dumb do you have to be to swallow the idea that the Liberal Party will keep Australia in the Paris Accord which requires emission reduction targets whilst refusing to have emissions reduction targets….the attack ads write themselves because the position indefensible.

Only a really cooked mind could believe that this a good outcome for the LNP…few if any moderates are going to swallow this nonsense. The LNP have locked themselves into doom spiral fight with One Notion to avoid minor party status.

Albrechtsen was suggesting the Liberals find a safe seat for Patterson in Victoria to move him from the Senate to the House…good luck with that now.

What a clown show.

It seems the Nationals are setting the agenda and the party is now the senior coalition partner!

It’s only going to get worse at the 2-watt intellects on the far right of the LNP will likely move on to attacking women’s rights and health care soon…

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/nov/05/coalition-mps-abortion-comments-horror-from-liberal-women

For those of us who’ve been asking the Liberals to ditch net-zero because of all its negative effects, today is a great day.

Thank you Sussan.

Sussan have left the liberals in oppersition for the next 20 years. Australia will be left behind by the rest of the world. I guess we are in good company with Trumps failing America.

Innovate or perish and the libs have voted to perish

Yes it makes the LNP unelectable at the next election. It truly is a great day.

clarkea – not sure about your analysis there. The climate change elections – 2010, 2013 and arguably 2019 provided strong results for the Coalition. Especially 2013 when Gillard told her big fib and Labor were trounced.

And you can tell from the reactions of Albo and the left-leaning media they’re now petrified there’ll be a real contest. Labor will have to come clean on their costings and why Australia has charged ahead of the rest of the world to the detriment of our economy, employment and standard of living. There’s been nine quarters of our SoL going backwards since Labor were elected with power prices rising over 20%.

As for the rest of the world, well have you even heard a squeak from Belem in the past week ? China, India, the USA and Russia sent third grade delegations and half the G20 haven’t updated their NPCs. The world is growing very tired of the whole climate thing now the costs are being realised.

If the Libs can find a strong leader to prosecute the case against net zero, which almost writes itself, then 2028 is in play.

“And you can tell from the reactions of Albo and the left-leaning media they’re now petrified there’ll be a real contest. “

LMAO…lol no.

The LNP proposes subsidising more expensive coal power stations Penfold, despite industry forging ahead with cheaper renewables.

What is the cost of the LNP proposal?

It’s fascinating Axon that you demand knowing Coalition policy costs but haven’t the slightest interest in what Albo’s net zero will cost.

Current estimates are $1.3 trillion, to 2050.

The fascination Penfold is in the fact that you have been calling for a “number” for net zero (see the budget and published Treasury modelling) and now will not come up with any number for your alternative; true hypocrisy, like the LNP on this subject.

My remaining interest is in the fact that the lowest cost path is via renewables with firming, incontrovertibly.

Current estimates for the LNP policy are $2.6 trillion, to 2050.

If you bothered to read the Treasury documents you’d learn they refuse to put a cost on what Albo’s net zero policy would cost.

I have read and quoted them to you Penfold. They point out that the cheapest path to 2050 is via renewables without interference or blocking from unnamed actors such as the ideological right. Immediate costs are in the budget.

The private sector is getting on with investment because they are mostly not stupid. Far from wanting to build new coal stations, they are keeping some open only with government guarantees against losses.

Where is the modelling or budget proposals for the LNP path, Penfold?

So a single number you cannot provide Axon. Imagine my shock.

Shocking is the fact you do not understand the fatuity of your “single number” demand. In return, why have you not presented the “single number” for the LNP proposal, backed up with source data and evidence? You avoid that because you know you cannot, that it is a silly idea you promulgate anyway. I state multiple sources of information because they are the components, and among them the largest component is private investment in new builds, and they are not building coal-fired power stations.

It has been demonstrated factually that renewables are cheaper and Penfold no longer even argues that apart from the occasional non-factual squeak. If you have two paths to a result where one is cheaper, faster and more effective then you choose that.

Money is being invested by the private sector in new and expanded electricity generation to meet Australia’s growing needs while old coal stations decline and are abandoned. None of those companies can tell you today precisely what they will have invested by 2050, but all of them know which path is cheaper, faster and more effective so they are taking it.

By abandoning Net Zero, the Libs are going to have to demonstrate how NZ will damage our economy. This is a big political gamble.

They’ll need to focus on bread and butter issues like price increases for cars under NVES, the every increasing cost of energy despite government promises, the impact on manufacturing and on jobs that NZ will cause.

They’ll need to argue the importance of gas our manufacturing industries and yet, they failed to support David Pocock’s motion for Australian to retain it’s uncontracted gas and make it available for Australians and Australian industry. (Maybe the Libs were looking after their big business exporting mates?).

Apart from anything else, surely gas is better than using coal, to provide a base load for electricity?

In the meantime despite our NZ pledge, many larger nations are expanding their coal usage……

I do sort of wonder whether NZ is even a real thing, or whether it’s just a catchy electoral marketing slogan? Is it just the 21st Centuary equivalent of Bob Hawke’s “No child will live in poverty….” pledge or the ACT Government’s “No Waste by…”

The question is whether there is anyone within the Liberal party that can lead them out if the wilderness? Locally, Conservatives Castley & Hanson fell on their swords in favour of Parton & Morris in an attempt to make the Canberra Libs more electable. It’ll help, although their success may first depend on the ACT Government leading us down a deeper financial hole.

I’m not so sure whether the same option exist Federally? I can’t see Ley surving and the other key players are soundly on the Right. The Libs might need someone like Josh Frydenberg to re-enter the parliament before the next election (via a by-election).

Interesting times.

Colin Wood, do you know what net zero is?

It is reducing emissions far enough that the planet ceases warming owing to human factors.

The principal source of emissions controllable by us is burning fossil fuels. If we reduce those, emissions will reduce.

Using wind power and solar power adds no emissions from their fuels, wind and sunshine, and as a further benefit reduces health problems from particle and gaseous pollution.

They are also proven cheaper, and are being built far faster than any other energy source, here and world-wide.

Apparently, the above is too hard for the ideological right of the LNP to understand. Do you?

Capital Retro1:22 pm 14 Nov 25

If we have another Krakatoa event all your fanciful claims will be in the bin, Axon.

And if a meteor hits your house, Capital Retro, your roofing will not stop it, so why do you have a roof at all? The jokes in cheap christmas crackers are more clever than your comments.

At least you agree by omission that my entire brief description of the case is correct.

Net zero is cheaper and cleaner….most people want sensible policies on climate & energy not more culture wars. This isn’t the win the culture warriors think it is…but at least it means that Hastie as one of the headline performers in this clown show won’t ever be PM.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-13/net-zero-iea-world-energy-report-emissions-cheaper-electricity/106000244

Stephen Saunders3:54 pm 13 Nov 25

With only platitudes on housing, no immigration limit, nuclear, no net zero, and no gas reservation, the Ley “offer” is in every respect worse than what Dutton took to voters in May.

That’s not a competitive opposition – it’s a mental illness.

Just to let some sunlight through into murky alternative universe you inhabit….Australian immigration is trending down but we still need immigrants, no net zero = higher energy prices (and more emissions which we’re all paying for through increased property damage and insurance premiums and that’s only likely to get worse), nuclear is still the most expensive form of energy and the only way it happens here is if the Liberals nationalise electricity because the for profit power companies don’t want to invest in that turkey (what are ya a socialist) and neither major party will fix housing because they’re afraid of the wedge politics of the other….if you want solutions vote for sensible independents.

Not that sensible is a word that gets much of a run in the alternative universe.

You are correct though, the LNP are not and won’t be a competitive opposition.

Chris – did you know 10 of the G20 countries haven’t submitted their NDCs due this year ?

But we digress …. The Liberals ditching net zero is a good first step. Next step is ditching Paris.

And just think, with so many countries crab walking away from net zero and ignoring the COPs, in 10 year’s time nobody will even be talking about net zero. Australia might have even started our land-based nuclear program to complement our ocean-based on. Now that would be progress !

As for the Climate Council – “If the Coalition keeps undermining the environment and the economy, they’re heading for net zero seats.” If this is such a bad and unpopular decision, why would the Climate Council care less ? Methinks they’re scared …. very scared …. and so they should be.

Happy days. 😁

“Methinks they’re scared …. very scared “….””thinks”, is optimistically doing a lot of heavy lifting there…..literally no one is scared of LNP at this point…but people who don’t think and only blindly support the LNP might be tempted to falsely believe wanting sensible policies on climate & energy equals blindly supporting Labor.

Albo’s angry, the Climate Council are furious, the teals, ABC and the Guardian have gone into meltdown.

If they’re all so certain of their own positions, why would they be worried. Oh, here’s why:

https://ipa.org.au/read/young-australians-unwilling-to-pay-more-than-50-for-net-zero

In fact other polling shows half of Australia isn’t prepared to pay $1 for net zero.

A good thing that changing energy generation to renewables will cost less compared with any alternative favoured by flat-earthers like the IPA, eh Penfold? Oh, you are one of them. Too bad, watch the world change around you, kick and scream at other people’s ability to think through a problem while the terrified cling to their bedsheets hoping their personal horrors do not emerge. Hint: they won’t. You are serving massive self interest, not the people, and right now the LNP are with you in that self-rejection of Australia and its people.

LMAO the IPA doing “analysis” lol ….but I love how you constantly hang on to every minor polling bounce, in any minor poll whilst ignoring trends and then go to elections with such hopeium and wonder why your team gets trounced.

You were doing this before the last election with Albo’s popularity….it’s delusional…funny….but delusional.

About that changing world …. you are correct inone sense …. the world is now completely ignoring the IPCC, COP, net zero and are waking up to tghe damage it’s causing.

Rejection and denial, enjoy that place Axon. The world is moving on.

Still waiting for your response about the link you posted from the CSIRO indicating 95.4% of CO2 is naturally emitted.

Now even i don’t believe that, but you posted it and the CSIRO said it 🙂 So defend it !

Sorry Penfold I don’t argue climate change denial nonsense and trolling. It’s boring and a waste of my time.

If you think you’ve cracked climate change write a paper and put it up for peer review by actual experts. Good luck with that.

If you want to review the actual evidence you can start here:
https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/

False as usual, Penfold.

Less than a decade ago, the IEA, which you have loved in the past, favoured fossil fuels over renewables. This year, they have recognised that renewables are cheaper so should be favoured.

The world is getting on with it despite some being faster, some slower. You choose not to notice facts. This is demonstrated in every thread in which you post.

Great, can they commit to dumping Digital ID too? Who even asked for it anyway? The electorate, or someone else?

Can’t dump net zero if you don’t win elections and you can’t win elections fighting One Notion for clueless fringe voters. PS. Unless you’ve been living in a change we already had digital id, it’s just getting streamlined….no party will be “dumping” it.

One suspects your digital ID proofing level is Basic seano.

Just quietly Penfold, I’m not at all bothered by your pointless, petty & lame off topic insults…they’re the calling card of someone who loses arguments and is upset about it…every one is a win lol…. no, what gets me is that like most right winger comedy they’re just not funny.

The thing about net zero is that it’s just a concept. A target to aim towards. Even Labor will not succeed in hitting the bullseye and anyone emotionally invested in that goal is going to be disappointed. Most people are extremely foolish when it comes to understanding policy. Net zero is the target. We throw the darts in that direction, that’s the agreed rules. The libs think being in opposition means proclaiming the darts should be thrown at the crowd instead. No one wants that except for psychopaths. Just say yes to net zero and do less about it, I think even scotty from marketing understood this much.

Much like bankruptcy is just a concept …. until it isn’t.

In the same way climate change is a concept… until it isn’t.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.