13 May 2025

Lots of reflecting for Labor and Smith to do over Bean

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
38

Federal Labor MPs David Smith, Andrew Leigh and Alicia Payne as well as Senator Katy Gallagher have all been re-elected. Photo: Region

Labor’s David Smith will no doubt be feeling a sense of relief that after nine days of vote counting for the seat of Bean, it has finally been decided and he will retain it for the Federal Government.

He will also certainly be grappling with a bunch of other emotions as he embraces the reality that he allowed one of the safest Labor seats in the country to become one of the most marginal.

Before the election, Labor held Bean by an almost 13 per cent margin. It clings onto it now without even a 1 per cent buffer.

That’s quite an extraordinary feat.

It is even more so when considering the trifecta of reasons that Labor should not have been so embarrassed in Bean.

First, Canberra is a Labor town, as was evidenced by the large margin the party had in all three House of Representatives seats from the ACT.

It was a no-brainer they’d all be returned, right?

Second, this federal election saw a Coalition attack on the nation’s capital like never before.

Canberrans flocked to make sure Peter Dutton’s plans for the ACT, for the APS and working parents were not implemented.

That meant voting for Labor en masse in the capital, yeah?

Then third, the anti-Dutton sentiment was so strong around the nation that Labor trounced the Opposition in a landslide win that significantly increased the government’s majority, increased individual margins, and relegated the Coalition to many years in the wilderness.

READ ALSO Labor retains Bean on the slimmest of margins, while Price vows to run again

Voters even turned on the Greens to make sure Labor had a majority and the Coalition was pummelled.

That emphatic message would only be magnified in the ACT vote, surely?

One would think the answer to all three of those points in question would be a firm “yes”.

Yet, here we are with Labour’s two northern-based MPs having increased their margins while their man in the south watched his disappear.

No one saw that coming, except for Region and the voters in the electorate.

There are plenty of reasons for this result.

Voters in the south have long felt a sense of second-class citizenry, which this federal election did nothing to assuage.

The campaign’s major infrastructure pledges were all for projects in the north.

There was also an extremely credible alternative to Labor in Bean this election, in the independent Jessie Price.

Ms Price ran an extraordinarily good campaign.

Being backed by Climate 200 with its considerable campaign funding and army of volunteers certainly helped there.

But Climate 200 doesn’t go to bat for just anyone; it has to first be convinced of the candidate’s credentials and commitment.

As Jessie Price proved to the organisation and the electorate, she’s the real deal.

Yet while these factors were certainly instrumental in Bean’s outcome, the main issue was that it had an incumbent whom hardly anyone knew.

READ ALSO Prime Minister reveals his second-term Cabinet and ministry

That might be understandable for a new contender, but for a two-term incumbent MP who was also previously a Senator, it’s inexcusable.

Can anyone in the ACT imagine seeing a photograph of Katy Gallagher and having no idea who she is?

Of course not. That’s Politics 101. Be known in the electorate. Be visible.

The fact that most voters in Bean didn’t know who Mr Smith was or what he even looked like only served to add to their feelings of being neglected and taken for granted.

That sentiment was festering by the time the election was called, with the electorate demanding a member who would show up for them.

Mr Smith has had the scare of his political life and Labor has some serious reflecting to do in the ACT, which is a shame for them with so much celebration going on.

Labor’s victory in Bean is to be rightly congratulated. A win is a win is a win.

Mr Smith’s feelings of relief are genuine and deserved.

But those other emotions he might be working his way through at the moment could include bewilderment, embarrassment, regret and/or a renewed determination.

He also might be feeling a little bit nervous about his preselection for the next federal election.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

38
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

To Katy and Andrew Leigh and especially you David Smith, you say there isn’t a message from the electorate because your primary vote didn’t change, so I will deliver my message personally – Do better! Do something! It’s not good enough that we might finally get NBN to the premises in 2028! It’s not good that we have 1 respite centre (that is being forced to close)! It’s not good enough that our 2 major unis don’t have enough funding! It’s not good enough that you can’t explain what the PS do enough that the rest of Australia seem fine with sacking 41,000 of them.

This actually wasn’t a swing against Smith and it shows a poor understanding of the way preferences are counted in our electoral system to claim otherwise. Mr Smith got about the same percentage of number 1 preferences as last time. His 2PP margin disappeared because of the collapse of the Liberal and Green votes. It meant those candidates were eliminated earlier when the preferences were distributed. It was an unusual situation. Ms Price did run a very good campaign, but she was helped by the lack of other independent candidates. This meant that when the traditional Liberal and Green Voters wanted to look elsewhere, there was only one other candidate if they didn’t want to vote Labor and it helped lift her primary count above the Liberal and Green candidates – meaning they were eliminated, while she was still in the race. Next time, if there is more than one independent candidate, it might not be the same result. If they end up splitting the vote and it might mean they will be eliminated before preferences from the other candidates are distributed.

People I spoke to while handing out How to Vote papers for David Pocock, had a lot to say about Smith’s candidacy. There are those who know him well and say positive things but there were a lot of suggestions about what he should do to enhance his prospects. I suspect that ACT Labor had not taken seriously the risk of loss. Obviouisly some work to do if he is the candidate in 2028.

Max_Rockatansky12:56 pm 13 May 25

Smith maintained his support base in Bean, his primary vote is 40.98% with a swing of just -0.75% against him, and his vote is well above the national Labor primary vote of 34.66%. The main difference is Smith won 62.95% after the preference count in 2022, but only 50.17% after the preference count this time.
In 2022 the Liberal finished second on primary votes, then 67.87% of the Independent votes and 89.62% of the Greens votes flowed to Smith, giving him 62.95% of the two candidate preferred vote.
This time the Independent finished second on primary votes, and while the final preference flow is not released yet, it appears the vast majority of Liberal votes flowed to the Independent.

Yes agreed and I commented similar on the other thread.

There’s clearly a level of discontentment down South, which is also seen in our local elections but I don’t think you can read too much into the swing.

There was a credible independent at the same time the Liberal party and Greens were on the nose, which is what made it so close. If the Liberal vote recovers to anywhere near where it was previously, it would be more difficult for the independent.

I think this shows that people are willing to consider their voting options but historically there’s been little real choice.

GrumpyGrandpa2:50 pm 13 May 25

G’day Max
You are spot on when you say “it appears the vast majority of Liberal votes flowed to the Independent”. They had no one else to vote for.

As for Greens voters? IDK. Maybe they saw their only way to victory, would be to preferencing the Independent ahead of the ALP. Maybe they considered Jessie Price’s website carried a number of policies that were somewhat supportive of their policies.

As a former long time resident of the area Bean covers, I can see how ignored the region has been for almost two decades.

Hopefully this close call might see Labor realise they need to balance their funding and support for south Canberra when compared to the hundreds of millions they have given the other two Canberra electorates.

Smith previously promised a new indoor netball court for Calwell, he couldn’t even garner support for a small initiative like this for his local constituency. Surely Labor can find some infrastructure funds towards the Tuggeranong Ice Rink and some updates to tired and broken community facilities and amenities in the south of the city.

Is this an article or a polemic? Why not congratulate the successful candidate who withstood a well financed campaign and suffered only a 0.7% reduction in his vote? David Smith MP is now part of the Federal Government and has a good relationship with the ACT Government. If Jesse Price had won Bean, she would owe a political debt to Simon Holmes a’Court who financed her campaign. If Jesse Price had won Bean, she would at best be allowed to ask a question every few months at Question Time. David Smith MP is now in a better position to serve Bean than Jesse Price.

“she would owe a political debt to Simon Holmes a’Court who financed her campaign”

Complete drivel. Unless you want to make the same claim about the LNP and Gina Rinehart?

Why not be honest? The right are more worried about the teals than they are about Labor because the Teals have occupied the ground on the centre right that the far right controlled LNP have abandoned.

Yes she would have been in debt just like the Libs with Rinehart and Trump with Qatar. Nobody gives good money away expecting nothing. Influence is what is for sale.

Sterling Stillwater2:21 pm 13 May 25

@google_user, independents at least ask real questions when they get the chance. Ordinary party MPs are allowed to ask Dorothy Dixers.

Climate 200 is funded by ordinary Australians, Gina Rinehart on the other hand is not.

@google_user
There are a number of MPs who have received crowd funded support from Climate200 (donors to which, include Simon Holmes a’Court).

Given you know how to use google, perhaps you can find some factual evidence to prove that those elected, with the support of Climate200, have repaid their “political debt to Simon Holmes a’Court”.

I won’t hold my breath, as when challenged to actually demonstrate how those, who received support from Climate200, repaid siad support politically, the accusers go missing. I expect you will do the same.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.