6 March 2025

Minister says Coalition copying current US approach to public service won't work in Australia

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
109
Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher

Public Service Minister Katy Gallagher has defended the APS’s current flexible working arrangements. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The Federal Government has hit back at Coalition plans to force public servants to work in the office five days a week, saying US-style policies don’t apply in Australia.

Finance and Public Service Minister Katy Gallagher suggested the Opposition was trying to copy the Trump Administration’s approach to the public sector, even though there is a completely different system here.

She also questioned anecdotal evidence shadow finance minister Jane Hume cited during a speech to the Menzies Research Centre this week.

Senator Hume said a Peter Dutton-led government would take away public servants’ “blank cheque” to work from home.

All members of the Australian Public Service would be required to work from the office five days a week under a Coalition government.

Senator Hume suggested that the current arrangements, which form part of the APS’s enterprise agreement, are being rorted.

“One public servant told my office that one of their colleagues worked from home five days a week. They were frequently uncontactable and thus unreliable,” Senator Hume said in her speech.

“Why? Because while they were working, they were also traveling around Australia with their family in a campervan.”

But Senator Gallagher has questioned the veracity of that allegation.

“I did notice that there was an anecdotal description of someone who called the office to say this was happening to someone they knew,” she said.

“So, I would say, if there is evidence of that particular scenario, she should be at least providing it to me because there are arrangements in place that would ensure that that behaviour is not acceptable, and those have existed under governments of all persuasions.

“But let’s just say that that particular cameo was pretty light on detail … you know, someone rings an office and says something, therefore, it’s a fact.”

READ ALSO Coalition talks more about APS job cuts as election announcement gets closer

In a subsequent media appearance, Senator Gallagher said the Coalition was trying to mimic what was happening in America in an effort to win votes in Australia.

US President Donald Trump has begun a mass sacking process in the federal bureaucracy and is ordering all remaining public sector workers back to the office full time.

“For a start, I think we should have policies for Australia that work for Australians, and I think copying policies from another country, in particular the United States, isn’t really applicable or shouldn’t be applicable here,” Senator Gallagher said.

“We should have a contest over what policies are right for us. We know that working from home arrangements are a part of modern workplaces.

“It’s allowed the public service to employ people from outside Canberra for people in regional and rural towns who probably never thought they could work for the public service, have been able to do so, and we know that for modern families or for working families in the modern era, working from home arrangements helped them balance a whole range of other priorities.

“I’ve asked for a review of the working from home arrangements by the Public Service Commission a couple of months ago, just to make sure that we are keeping an eye on how it’s working across the APS if there are any challenges with it, but also what are the benefits that come with it.

“The anecdotal feedback from managers to me is that it’s working well. It’s allowing agencies to recruit and retain people and that all operational needs are being met.”

Shadow finance minister Jane Hume delivered a speech in Sydney Monday night (3 March) to the conservative think tank the Menzies Research Centre. Photo: Adam Taylor.

Senator Hume referred to “plenty of studies out there” demonstrating that working from home “actually decreases productivity rather than increases productivity”.

“A recent report from Stanford’s Institute for Economic Policy Research consolidated research on working from home and its impact on productivity,” she said in her speech on Monday.

“One paper in the report found that regardless of perceptions for employees and employers about their own productivity, in reality, these arrangements led to a reduction in productivity, with the worst being fully remote workers.

“One paper found that after work from home arrangements were put in place, productivity fell by about 20 per cent.”

Senator Gallagher hit back at those Coalition claims too.

“I don’t think it’ll surprise your listeners to know that I don’t agree with Senator Hume or the comments she’s made,” the Minister said.

“And I don’t even know if she agrees with them, either, considering the report she cited in defence of an argument of productivity actually said, if you read it, that hybrid arrangements between the workplace and home actually improve productivity.

“So I think really this has been an announcement seeking a headline rather than anything substantive, based on any evidence.”

Join the conversation

109
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

There are lots of assertions about whether or not WFH is the way to go. Is there data on this or is it all anecdotes and opinions?

devils_advocate10:00 am 08 Mar 25

The data is confounded by management practices.

WFH delivers equal or better productivity so long as managers were actually able to have appropriate performance measures and targets in place to begin with.

For ineffective managers who used office attendance as a proxy for productivity, it obviously exposed their incompetence.

Like a tree falling in the forest, can anyone hear it – get rid of 20,000 public servants and no one would notice

Complete, and utter nonsense.

Yes all those public servants managing public servants, managing public servants, managing public servants is utter nonsense

@Futureproof
Yeah those “ public servants managing public servants” are probably a little busy to defend themselves … a lot of them are getting ready to administer the crisis relief payments for those affected by Alfred. You may have pulled your head for long enough to have heard of it.

Cooked drivel.

I’d be willing to bet you’d bet the first to whinge if any service was not up to your expectation whilst at the same time calling for your for your fellow Australians to be sacked for no other reason than culture wars.

Oh yes, those useful public servants working in departments like Tanya Plebisek’s to administer banning of gold mines and job opportunities for the local indigenous people, oh and working on assisting to decimate the the Salmon industry in Tasmania. Maybe they could be diverted to human services to help those affected by Cyclone Alfred

While his electorate gets smashed by a cyclone Dutton was in Sydney at a fundraiser.

He really is Temu Trump.

@Seano
While I am clearly not a fan of Dutton, Seano, I’m struggling to see what difference Dutton can make to the impending natural disaster that is cyclone Alfred, irrespective of whether he’s at a fundraiser in Sydney or at home in his electorate.

Well besides being a member of the community and chipping in as others are to help out, he’d be the first to criticise his opponents if roles were reversed.

PS. Any bets Dutton has property in the electorate? It would be almost as amazing as a former QLD copper amassing a $300m property portfolio that none of it is in his actual electorate.

Because while Peter is fundraising to make himself PM his fellow QLDers are working to shore up properties in the electorate to save them from a cyclone and some of those properties may actually be a part of Dutton’s astounding property portfolio.

@Seano
Yeah … nah. I actually think Qld-ers have more to worry about than a touch of political one-upmanship … seriously, nothing to see herte – time to move on.

Capital Retro5:24 pm 07 Mar 25

“smashed”?
Get real Seano, it’s only a ordinary cyclone. Many been there before and many to come.
I think the ABC is bitterly disappointed it didn’t become a cat. 5 one.

@Capital Retro
That’s a new low, CR, even for someone like you.

@JustSaying. Yeah nah, Dud Dutton was at a fundraiser while his constituents filed sandbags to protect houses…something you’d think he’d care about.

@Capital spoken like some who has never been in a cyclone or outside.

BTW and I know that thinking is a challenge for some but the ABC’s coverage is no different to any of the other coverage in tone.

Of course if the ABC weren’t taking it seriously you’d crying about them not living up to their charter or something. Partisans are always so tediously transparent.

Capital Retro9:28 am 08 Mar 25

The only “low” involved is the now description of the cyclone which has fizzled into a tropical low.

@Capital Retro
And yet, you manage to sink even lower, by mocking the impact for those in the path of Alfred. No surprise – it’s par for the course for you.

A person has died, others have been injured and lost properties and businesses but you keep doing culture wars Capital.

Some heroes don’t wear capes.

And of course Capital doesn’t come back and put his hand and say “I’m sorry, I got that wrong”.

At some point the pro-MAGA people are going to realise that the perception of “winning” isn’t worth selling your integrity for.

@Seano
Not sure using “pro-MAGA” and “integrity” in the same sentence is appropriate.

GrumpyGrandpa4:43 pm 06 Mar 25

Linking what might happen to the Australian Public Service to decisions being made in the US, is just a bit alarmist.

Bringing people back to the office, is something that is happening. It’s not sonething that is exclusively linked to the Conservatives. NSW Premier Minns is pretty keen on it too.

There is also one really big difference between Australia and the USA; we don’t have Trump (& Musk)!

“Linking what might happen to the Australian Public Service to decisions being made in the US, is just a bit alarmist.”

Dutton literally said he’d put the terminally dim Jacinta Price in charge of an Elon Musk style DOGE.

So either you’re commenting while uniformed or you’re another partisan who knows what a disaster a Prime Minister Dutton would be and are seeking to provide cover.

With Gallager at the helm it’s not hard to see why productivity is going backwards.

I think the coalition is just engaging in some verbal Canberra bashing in the pursuit of votes. They’ve said the current employment agreement will be honoured, and they’ve said working from home will still be allowed where it works for everyone. They just won’t have the power to enforce a full return to the office policy. Anyone who supports Labor Mediscare campaigns should just view this as the other side of the coin.

Musk literally sacked the dudes looking after the nukes and then had to desperately find them to hire them back…he also sacked the people managing bird flu during a bird flu epidemic.

Genius stuff.

But at least Dutton hasn’t threatened to also put an idiot in charge of his indiscriminate hack and slash of Australian government and services…oh wait.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.