20 May 2025

Nationals split from Libs to end Coalition

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
48
woman and two men in parliament house courtyard

Senator Bridget McKenzie, Nationals Leader David Littleproud and Deputy Leader Kevin Hogan. Photo: David Littleproud Instagram.

The Liberal and National parties have ended the Coalition, deciding to split over policy positions in the wake of their thumping defeat at the 3 May federal election.

Nationals leader David Littleproud announced the divorce just before midday Tuesday (20 May), saying the parties would not be reentering into an agreement.

He said that while discussions with Liberal leader Sussan Ley were respectful, she needed to rebuild her party.

“They are going on a journey of rediscovery, and this will provide them the opportunity to do that without the spectre of the National Party imposing their will,” he said.

But those discussions broke down over the Nationals’ demand for the Coalition to retain nuclear energy, regional infrastructure funding and supermarket divestiture policies as part of the Coalition agreement.

Ms Ley didn’t want to include any policy positions as part of the agreement, but instead leave everything open for discussion.

READ ALSO Approaches to environment policy a challenge to election winners and losers

“After the discussions that both Sussan Ley and I have had over the ensuing period, our party room has got to a position where we will not be reentering a Coalition agreement with the Liberal Party after this election,” Mr Littleproud said.

“We have got to a position that the National Party will sit alone on a principled basis.

“On the basis of looking forward, not having to look back and to try and actually regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the people we represent.

“We have had a coalition of over 80 years, and I suspect we will have one in the future. It has been broken before.

“What this is about is taking a deep breath and saying to the Australian people, this is time apart for us to be better, to focus on them.

“This is a healthy part of our democracy which we should be proud of … We look forward to what else we can do as a party, and as part of an Opposition now that can shape the lives of regional Australians for the better.”

READ ALSO Coalition infighting over the spoils of Opposition

The Nationals leader said the split was not over frontbench positions in the depleted Opposition, but rather over policy.

He noted, however, that the Nationals’ vote held up better than the Liberals’ at the election, in which Labor romped into a second term with more than 90 seats.

“I gave her [Ms Ley] the commitment that I’ll work with her every day to help to try to rebuild the relationship to the point we can reenter a Coalition before the next election,” Mr Littleproud said.

“But at this juncture, we’re making a principled position about not what we’re prepared to give up on, but to build on what we achieved and to move forward.”

Senior Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie suggested the Liberal Party was not willing to budge on policy issues important to the Nationals.

“A reasonable request was put to a trusted partner and it was refused,” she said.

“Policies that we had fought for, that only a few weeks ago, we fought an election on.”

The Nationals’ deputy leader, Kevin Hogan, noted that a number of Nationals MPs and Senators will lose their positions by leaving the Coalition.

But he flagged a time when both parties will reform a Coalition once more.

“We are always best as a country with a strong Coalition,” he said.

“I hope, my wish in the future, is that it is going to happen again sooner rather than later.

“But we needed to make, for us, a principled stand on things today that we could not move on.”

Ms Ley is yet to comment publicly on the Coalition split.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

48
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

So the Nats become completely irrelevant now while the Libs get a real chance at reform.

Pretty much.

The Nats seem to think they’ll pick up liberal seats and be in a more powerful position at the next election…Skynews has gone in hard on Ley for being “Malcolm Turnbull in a skirt”…this is the same person who stood next to Dutton nodding along during the voice. The Nats could be on to something but it’s far more likely that cannibalising each other won’t help the Libs or the Nats in the long run.

Personally, I think the election showed that Murdoch’s influence on Australian politics is little too non-existent, the sort of dopes who uncritically swallow Skynews culture wars drivel were already voting far right wing without the direction anyway. And the rest of Australia simply doesn’t watch it.

The Nats have turned a tough situation into an impossible one. But I guess the far right still has to learn the lesson…the reason they’re losing is them not us.

HiddenDragon10:39 pm 20 May 25

To the extent that this is about climate change/nuclear, both parties could do a lot worse than revisit the “technology not taxation” line which Morrison used for a time as a middle course between the fundamentalists and zealots on both sides of the debate.

In essence, it was about moving at a pace which available technology makes affordable and practicable, rather than trying to get ahead of the technology, or being blinkered to it.

Untroubled by elections (and thus without the need for a three word slogan) the hard headed rationalists in China are doing that, as they install record amounts of renewables (as we are regularly told), backed up by lots of new nuclear and coal (as we are somewhat less regularly told).

After being bitten on the backside by reality, the virtue-signalling governments of Europe will end up at a similarly pragmatic point, but that won’t stop them from using compliance with the theatre and formalities of net zero as a trade barrier – which is why Australian primary producers will want the Nats to reach an accommodation on this issue (regardless of how often Sky After Dark tells them that Australia’s emissions are too small to matter).

In the same way that many voters will eventually be confronted by the reality that Labor’s ever-expanding promises of “free” stuff has to be paid for, the gap between what has been promised and what can be delivered by Labor’s energy policies will become increasingly clear, particularly to all those voters who want “real action” on climate change – but only if it has little or no direct financial cost to them. When that happens, the Liberals will need to be ready with a workable alternative which will still make sufficient numbers feel good about themselves.

The problem is that coal and nuclear do not provide dispatchable power to firm renewables and in an open market that simply leads to coal/nuclear being uneconomical.

China is installing significantly higher amounts of renewables than new coal capacity (nuclear is barely a blip), but their market conditions would not remotely be described as “free”, with most new coal plants being funded by coal mining interests and protected by local provincial governments to shore up local industries. Its protectionism that will end up more costly for them, with stranded assets becoming more common.

If you want a fossil fuel source to help the energy transition occur more smoothly in Australia, we have loads of it available locally.

Gas.

“In essence, it was about moving at a pace which available technology makes affordable and practicable”…we’re already doing that, the only thing slowing us down has been captured right wing parties pushing nonsense like “virtue-signalling”.

Who gets Murdoch in the divorce?

And who gets Jacinta Price? Skynews probably.

I just don’t “get it” with the Nationals and their climate change stance. They claim to represent farmers, but the people who are most adversely impacted by extreme weather events are farmers. Why would they not take this seriously. I come from a farming family in Tasmania and I don’t know of even one farmer who supports the Nationals.

The Nats gave up on rural Australia to become the party of the mining lobby. Without the cover of Murdoch’s version of Foxnews which has failed here, and having party policy dictated by out of touch mining billionaires it was always going to end badly.

While it’s not good that there’s effectively no opposition at least for awhile, Labor have a mandate and a lot of clear air, they should use it.

Calling the party of Tony Abbott, Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton too far to the left is what happens when someone exclusively consumes a diet of Skynews and abandons all critical thinking as a result. The self delusion is at least entertaining.

The Nats are now essentially the political wing of the mining lobby, and therefore will not give up on the climate wars, so good on the Ley for having the courage to listen to the electorate.

The Nats may think split is a good move but the mistake they’re making IMO is that it’s clear to all that they’re the political wing of the mining lobby who have largely abandoned people in rural Australia, something that will come home to bite them.

The Liberals have a genuine opportunity to reset now but I doubt they will, Ley sits in her seat by one actual vote as two of the out going senators who voted for her have left. With cooked units like Antic in the party she’s going to be up against it.

I doubt they will but Labor should take this opportunity to tax the mining companies appropriately and put that money back into the country, they’ve gotten away with ripping us all off for too long.

Chris in all the excitement you forgot to mention that this is the third time the Coalition has split in 80 years.

The Libs have moved too far to the left and become Labor-lite. They need to move back to their mainstream values. Ditching the krazy net zero policy would be a very good start.

Keep telling yourself that Penfold – if you do so, then the electorate will make it easy for you to recycle the same old talking points for an indefinite period.

Capital Retro2:34 pm 20 May 25

Labor are eternally split by factions and egos.

We need Nigel Farage here for a week or two and establish a Reform Party.

CR we certainly need someone to start talking some common sense.

Maybe you and I should start the “You know it makes sense” party. Do you think Gina might fund it ?

So it can split the Trumpet of Patriots and One Nation vote?

You do know the teals are essentially former Libs who believe in doing something about climate change right? If Libs ditch net zero they will never win another city based seat and may well lose several regional seats to Teals as well

“Former Libs” who vote with the greens. Funny one ID.

As for net zero, people are starting to realise all it means is huge power bills.

@Penfold
I have a feeling that after counting her financial losses over the Dutton investment, Rinehart won’t be backing more losers anytime soon, Penfold.

I’d suggest you and CR hit up Clive Palmer – he’s shown a clear propensity for supporting duds.

I do enjoy the funny takes from your fantasy world Capital…

“We need Nigel Farage here for a week or two and establish a Reform Party.”

Oh that’s precious.

Besides the fact the Coalition just lost in a landslide and fractured as a result after running a Farage-esq culture wars campaign, just watch Nigel melt at the next election when the attack ads point out them monumental lies he told about what Brexit would deliver and compare it to what was actually delivered.

PS. What do you think One Nation is? Not to mention the other cooker parties. Funny stuff lol.

Gregg Heldon4:08 pm 20 May 25

You need to learn some history about the Liberal Party and stop being an embarrassment to those of us who vote right of centre, Penfold.
The Liberal Party has, traditionally, been centre right. Abbott and Morrison took the party too far to the right. Dutton bought it back a bit but not enough. Hopefully, Ley will continue to bring them back to centre right.
The best Liberal Governments have always been centre right, just like the better Labor Governments have been centre left.
If you’re not happy with that, become a candidate for One Nation or Clive Palmer. Be a member of a party that has your values.

Gregg – not sure i believe your bona fides based on that post. The Liberal party I support is the one built in the mould of Menzies and Howard – fiscally responsible, small government, secure borders, economic growth, governing for all (or at least most) Australians. Policies that reflected values.

We agree on the centre right, but unlikely on what that means. To me it means no bedwetters like Photios, Turnbull and Kean.

On what basis do you claim Abbott and Morrison took things too far right ? Morrison spent like a drunken sailor and supported the climate nonsense, though did a great job during covid. Abbott – to use the cliches – stopped the boats, ditched the carbon tax and tried to fix the budget carnage of RGR. If you reckon that’s too far right then you probably watch the ABC.

JS – thanks for another solid contribution to vaporous vaccilifrating. No, it’s not a word.

@Penfold
Your welcome – happy to have contributed to your vacuous void … and they are words.

Penfold, your fantasies over what is good for the Liberals are spot on to explain their landslide loss.

Yes JS, your contribution fitted nicely in there.

Sounds like you know Gina well, so you’d know her and Barnaby are good mates. The Nats have come out of this election looking much better than the Libs. And yes as we saw with those woke netballers, she doesn’t support losers for long.

vipr – wow, sounds like you’ve already conducted the post-mortem, that was quick.

Perhaps you could share some of those findings and recommendations for the benefit of us all.

@Penfold
“her and Barnaby are good mates”
Really? Maybe they’ve shared a footpath together?

Yeah – funny how having an awareness of racial prejudice and discrimination, can lead to those ‘losers’, being the number one ranked netball team in the world, Penfold. Though, I’m going to go out on a limb, and suggest skill, commitment and mental toughness may have played a tiny part in their achievement.

Diamonds may be a “girl’s best friend”, but they are definitely not Gina’s best friend.

“The Nats have come out of this election looking much better than the Libs. And yes as we saw with those woke netballers, she doesn’t support losers for long.”

The Nats lost seats at the election, the coalition is broken taking away any chance that they will be in government any time soon, with no agreement they will now be in direct competition with the Liberals and they are doubling down on the policies that the last election was fought and lost on. If Gina doesn’t support losers for long then the Nationals are effectively DOA. Enjoy.

Gregg Heldon8:08 pm 20 May 25

Penfold, I believe in the party of Menzies, Fraser and Howard too. However, your comments half the time do not portray you as centre right. Hence my comments.
Haven’t watched the ABC in years. Don’t know why you would think that I do.

JS – they’ve certainly shared a few lear jets together.

As for the netballers, well wasn’t that one of the great own goals of all time. Gina’s highly successful dad said something silly back in the 1980’s and 40 years later they won’t accept Gina’s money because of it. This is the pure definition of woke. $15 million worth of woke. Ouch.

No problem Penfold. Try reading the LNP policies then look at the votes. Take your time.

A first recommendation has already been accepted with the split so that the LP can plant their feet in the centre-right space again, divorced from NP unreality.

You may now be interested in joining the Nationals, given their policies seem not too far to the left of yours.

@Penfold
The daughter refuses to distance herself from her father’s racist remarks … yes, you are right the Diamonds are definitely the pure definition of woke, ie a total awareness of of racial prejudice and discrimination. And even without Gina’s conditional largesse, this amazing team is still number one in the world … have to admire winners who can’t be bought.

So your post-election analysis vipr is to read the policies and look at the votes. That’s some deep analysis.

But I did take your suggestion and have a look at the Nats policies, expecting to see hard-right ideas commensurate with the hard right views of farmers whose goal is to feed Australians and the world:

“Low inflation, cheaper energy, affordable homes, safer communities, quality healthcare.”

Well you can’t get much harder right than that can you, no wonder they lost ground.

As for the Liberals, well it must be the nuclear policy you say. On the back of the nuclear policy the Coalition had lifted its primary vote to 40% before the election was called, so no it wasn’t that. Labor did use the laughable “$600 billion” figure to good effect which would have had an impact.

So perhaps you could dig a little deeper and get back to us. Take your time.

JS – don’t forget the players refused to wear the Hancock logo, howzat for stupidity. I used to enjoy watching Aus v England, Ferns and Jamaica but have turned off ever since. Are they still solvent ?

Penfold, Its obvious to everyone that Australia is not and never has been a far right country. Why would you want a far right opposition that is never electable. I for one will never vote for a party in the house of reps that campaigns for nuclear. It was with a heavy heart that I voted labor in the house of reps for the first time in 40 years.

Liberals have a lot to offer if they keep away from Nuclear. example are tax reform and industrial relations reform. These two policies outweigh nuclear.

Labor did not win this election the Liberals lost it big time by coming up with policies that few could stomach.

Penfold the Liberals windfall loss was as a consequence of policies like nuclear and getting rid of net zero. I for one a hard core liberal voter could not support a party that pushes for nuclear power. I would prefer to vote for a bad labor government. And that’s what I did.

Dear god, sportspersons actually demonstrating they are human beings and have a conscience. What a disgrace hey penfold…..

They should just lick and beg at the altar of Gina like the LNP have done for so long right?

I’m sure your viewership has not been missed one little bit.

So you do not want to look at reality Penfold. What a surprise.

This was the funniest bit: “… lifted its primary vote to 40% before the election was called” but when the chickens were counted, it was 31.9%. Oh dear.

The vote was a landslide loss for the Libs. The policies which were concrete rather than lip-service were rejected by the centre of the Australian people. Start thinking from there.

t [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

UNOFFICIAL

clarkea – Australia isn’t “far-right” as you say, it’s generally supported sensible centre-right policies for 70% of the time since WW2. I’ve never voted for the Nats, but what on earth is “far right about them ?

Nuclear is hardly that, it’s present in over 30 countries. Reliable, clean and price-competitive the most vocal opponents are the rent-seeking renewables lobby which gouges the public purse.

As for voting for a bad Labor government you weren’t alone. The Albanese government isn’t just bad, but possibly the worst. It is a bad indictment on Dutton that he couldn’t take advantage of their incompetence and dishonesty.

@Penfold
No – I haven’t forgotten the Diamonds’ refusal to advertise the company of the woman whose father made racist comments.
Oh and yes Netball Australia are very solvent and as previously mentioned, the team is number one in the world and I am very confident they will not be losing sleep over the fact that you are no longer a supporter

Great story JS. Here’s a few cold hard facts. Presume you’ve heard of Liz Ellis:

“Netball Australia’s financial woes have been highly publicised, the perception never recovering after Gina Rinehart’s $15m sponsorship blow.”

“There is a debt hanging over the organisation. There’s some work to do around increasing our commercial viability …. Super Netball unfortunately still loses money. We need to turn that around as a board and as a leadership group.”

“The last couple of years the sport has gone from crisis to crisis”

https://7news.com.au/sport/netball/liz-ellis-details-major-problem-hanging-over-netball-australia-after-board-backflip-c-14491755

PS JS, given you’re high pulpit comments, I hope nobody in your family has ever made a racist comment. That would be awkward.

Capital Retro12:19 pm 21 May 25

Too late for that Penfold, the Marxists have already infiltrated the system and they have access to a “bile bot” which is in pile-on mode 24/7.

@Penfold
Speaking of stories, Penfold, perhaps keep up to date:
https://netball.com.au/news/record-crowds-power-financial-results
You asked about Netball Australia’s solvency didn’t you? At least try to prosecute the case you raised 🤦‍♂️

Oh and I can assure you that none of my family have ever had racist comments attributed to them in the media – because, as others have seen, that is indeed awkward.

Well good on netball JS for digging themselves out of that hole they dug themselves.

As for your claims about media comments

Oops …. now to channel yourself, prove it !

@Penfold
Hmmmm … prove something doesn’t exist … yeah, not going to happen, Penfold

… but hey, you can believe in whatever you like – my care factor on that is zero.

The standard you set JS shouldn’t be the standard you walk past. Some might call it hypocrisy 🤪

@Penfold
Yeah – you are hardly the one to pontificate on standards, Penfold … but dream on

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.