16 May 2025

New push to discover what's driving Canberra's kids' high rate of developmental vulnerability

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
33
line of children and teacher

The inaugural Child First Forum saw community services come together to spur conversation around what’s causing the ACT’s children to face the country’s second-highest rates of developmental vulnerability. Photo: Facebook.

The ACT has the second-highest percentage of developmentally vulnerable children in the country, but what’s causing this issue is the “million-dollar question”.

Families ACT executive director Rebecca Zappelli said the volunteers hosted the Territory’s inaugural Child First Forum to try and find out.

“We have a vulnerability crisis,” she said.

“The risk in the ACT is this will become more and more entrenched unless we do something now, we are at our crisis point.”

According to the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) 2021 survey, 26.7 per cent of Canberra’s children were developmentally vulnerable on one domain, and 13.3 per cent on two or more.

The domains of child development measured are: physical health and wellbeing; social competence; emotional maturity; school-based language and cognitive skills; and communication skills and general knowledge.

The ACT was second to the Northern Territory in every category except for language and cognitive skills.

The highest rates of childhood development vulnerability were in the Belconnen and Tuggeranong areas.

Child developmental vulnerability data chart

Top 20 developmentally vulnerable suburbs in the ACT, sorted by percentage of children developmentally vulnerable in one or more domains, 2021. Photo: AEDC/Families ACT.

Ms Zappelli said this issue became apparent when children entered school.

“So we want to get intervention in those early years, before they reach school,” she said.

“We have some interventions at a community and school level, but there needs to be structural change to complement those efforts.”

The AEDC website stated investing time, effort and resources into children’s early years brought “lifelong benefits” to them and the community.

“Gaps in children’s performance levels open up early and stay mostly constant after eight years of age. Beyond eight years, school environments can only play a small role in reducing these differences,” it stated.

“Investing in the early years can reduce expenditure on special education, criminal justice and welfare, and can increase national productivity by improving the skills of the workforce, reducing disadvantage and strengthening the global competitiveness of the economy.”

READ ALSO Businesses hit by light rail construction want more but government firm on direct financial support

The AEDC survey has been conducted every three years since 2009. According to data from 2015 onwards, while most other states and territories either decreased or marginally increased their rates, the ACT reported an overall increase of 4.2 per cent.

That’s compared to an increase of 0.9 per cent in NSW and a 2.1 per cent increase by Tasmania, a reduction of 1.4 per cent in child developmental vulnerability in QLD and Victoria’s levels remaining stable.

Child developmental vulnerability data chart

Child developmental vulnerability across all domains and jurisdictions, 2021. Photo: AEDC/Families ACT.

Ms Zappelli said there were a lot of theories about why the ACT was experiencing such a high rate of child developmental vulnerability.

These include changes to NDIS reforms, the high proportion of Canberra kids in long daycare, lack of easily accessible perinatal health and wellbeing services across the Territory, and difficulties accessing playgroups.

“One key driver is potentially around poverty, but we just don’t know,” Ms Zappelli said.

“What we are seeing [in the community sector] is that vulnerability is increasing, more people need support, more people are engaging with services.

“It’s the million-dollar question: what is it that’s driving this?”

She said it was hoped the forum would lead to more strategic investments across the Territory rather than a “broad-brush” approach.

Other aims include getting children’s voices more involved in influencing policy and for better data and information to be collected.

READ ALSO CIT staff morale slumps after deficit blowout and decision to scrap commercial arm

The next AEDC survey results are due this year.

During the recent Legislative Assembly sitting week, the ACT Government was asked if the rate had improved since 2021.

The question was taken on notice, given the data is not yet available.

Children, Youth and Families Minister Michael Pettersson was also asked what the government had done to support developmentally vulnerable kids.

This was also taken on notice, given the issue didn’t “neatly fit” within the one portfolio.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

33
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
davidmaywald9:53 pm 19 May 25

The Report on Government Services from the Productivity Commission does show that ACT has consistently had the highest attendance for children in child care, from 2015-2024 (see Figure 3.3a). In 2021, 59.2 per cent of 0-5 year olds in the ACT attended child care services, compared to 47.2 per cent nationally. The percentage of ACT children attending an ECEC centre (daycare) has increased steadily since 2009. Average hours each week is slightly higher than the national average, for centre based day care. Child care is more expensive in ACT than in any other state, but fewer primary contact staff have relevant formal qualifications or three plus years of relevant experience than any other state (Figure 3.5a). ACT also has the equal lowest percent of teachers delivering preschool programs, with at least university training and an early childhood qualification (Figure 3.5 b). About one-fifth of services in the ACT have not been approved for the National Quality Standard (NQS), but of those that have been approved about half are exceeding NQS (high compared to other states). The quality of services varies greatly in the ACT, they are not consistent. There are many more serious incidents in ACT, than in other states. The percent of ACT children classified as developmentally vulnerable after having some Early Childhood Education and Care has risen from 21% in 2015 to 26% in 2021, while the percent with no ECEC who are developmentally vulnerable has fallen from 49% in 2015 to 45% in 2021.

There is some evidence from psychological, sociological, and political science research suggesting that individuals with left-leaning political views (especially in Western countries) report higher rates of mental health conditions, including anxiety and depression. Several surveys, particularly from the United States, have found higher self-reported rates of mental health issues among left-leaning individuals. Pew Research Center found in 2020 that progressive young adults (especially white women under 30) were significantly more likely to report mental health challenges than their conservative counterparts. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) also found similar trends in terms of self-reported psychological distress. American College Health Association surveys showed that college students who identified as progressive were more likely to report anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation than conservatives. A 2020 paper in the journal Sociological Science found that left-leaning political ideology is correlated with greater emotional distress, especially among young white progressives. A 2023 study in Political Psychology suggested that people with progressive ideologies may experience higher psychological strain, due to perceived societal injustice and systemic issues. Left-leaning individuals often prioritise social justice, inequality, and systemic problems. People who lean left are generally more open to discussing mental health, and are less likely to view it as stigmatised. Online activism and identity-based stress can also increase emotional vulnerability.

Too many weak, woke parents.

Kirsten Anker1:35 pm 19 May 25

It would be interesting to know what conditions place a child in the category “developmentally vulnerable”. Having that knowledge may assuage some of the concerns expressed in these comments that these conditions arise from particular parental ideologies.

Sarah Michaels3:12 am 19 May 25

Canberra is characterised as the most ideologically motivated region in our country, heavily focused on advancing specific agendas. It’s any wonder children in this environment face significant challenges. A glance at many parents reveals that they endure and openly (and proudly) acknowledge serious mental health issues within themselves. There is an excessive emphasis on adult diagnoses of ADD/ADHD, when it is more plausible that these individuals simply prefer not to engage in work, recognising a government that readily caters to such irrational demands. This mindset is then transferred to their children, resulting in a decline in their mental well-being. Schools in the ACT promote the most extensive woke ideology curriculum across Australia, including private schools, which discourages independent thinking among students. Furthermore, the government appears to favour those with mental health challenges over diligent workers, raising concerns about the increasing vulnerability of children. It may be necessary to address Canberra in a manner akin to how Springfield was treated in The Simpsons; a protective barrier should be established to shield the rest of the nation from the extremities of Canberra. If geographically feasible, it would be in the best interest of all Australians to isolate Canberra and send it out to sea.

Remove the cottonwool from a child’s up bringing, encourage independence. Instead they are indoctrinated with woke nonsense. Australia has raised a flock of sheep, not lions.

Which are the “woke” bits? And why are they wrong?

Exactly, the ACT ” woke and DEI” curriculum is the problem. Nothing else

Which are the “woke” bits Rob? Can you point them out? We both know you can’t.

Previously formally known as Strong Woman whom may be a guy1:04 pm 19 May 25

Check it out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgfQksZR0xk professor

or the View which is left and so is Bill, who at the same time is logical CIS man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tn1X-j09o1M

Of course the fact that the ACT has the most woke and DEI school curriculum has absolutely nothing to do with this, does it?

The ACT uses the Australian national curriculum which all of the states and territories use either fully or in part. But you’re welcome to point out the “woke” bits and explain why they are “woke”. I bet you can’t.

Posting, factually wrong, clueless culture wars drivel into comments sections is about derailing serious discussion of serious issues by very unserious people. In most of the world these anti-knowledge dopes are losing and that includes Australia judging by the recent election results where the cooker parties did very poorly.

You said it exactly Seano “wrong, clueless culture wars.” The recent election results show the Communist Greens becoming irrelevant in the lower house , the ALP keeping government with their lowest primary vote ever and two thirds of the Australian electorate voting against your ALP. Explanation of “woke” Seano. Webster Dictionary last year. ” WOKE” awakened, culturally aware, usually associated with Socialist politics and ideology. As for your claim the ACT is somehow part of a national educational curriculum….FALSE. Every state and territory has their own educational curriculum. There is NO uniform educational Australian educational curriculum as you well should know? Don’t you?

Wow Rob you’re amazingly wrong about everything, but that’s not going to stop you posting drivel anyway huh?

The Greens increased their vote despite losing seats in the house. The Greens alone hold the balance of power.

Labor increased their primary vote from the last election. Not that any of that matters because we don’t have a first past the post system. It is idiotic to suggest that two thirds of people don’t want Labor when a large chunk of those people voted or the Greens and people vote according to the preferential system.

The fact that you don’t understand this stuff suggests you should stop commenting on politics.

As for your dictionary definition. Did you actually read it? It says nothing about “socialist politics”. You’re laughably clueless, but what’s exactly wrong with being socially aware? Please explain?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woke

And you’re wrong about the curriculum:
“From kindergarten to year 10, we teach the Australian Curriculum version 9.0”
https://www.act.gov.au/education-and-training/teaching-and-assessment/what-we-teach-curriculum?utm_source=education&utm_medium=redirect

Log off mate, go for a walk, maybe touch some grass because everything you believe is based on a foundation of nonsense and that might take a bit to process.

CaptainSpiff10:49 am 19 May 25

@Seano did you miss this part:

2) disapproving : politically liberal or progressive (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme

A bit ironic that as you police these forums 24/7 you instruct others to log off and go for a walk 🙂 The world won’t collapse if you’re not here slagging off anyone who dares to express a view different from your own, “champ”.

What does that prove Captain champ?

That dopey right wing culture warriors consider people calling out racial or social injustice as extreme?

lol genius stuff.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.