17 October 2025

'Once-in-a-generation' plan to build thousands of homes near Thoroughbred Park open for consultation

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
49
photo of horses at thoroughbred park

Up to 6200 homes – along with shops and community spaces – could be built in the Thoroughbred Park precinct if a major amendment to the Territory Plan is passed. Photo: Thoroughbred Park.

A new housing and community precinct at Canberra’s Thoroughbred Park is a step closer to reality with community consultation opening on a proposed major amendment to the Territory Plan.

If passed, it would allow up to 6200 homes to be built at the Thoroughbred Park precinct in Lyneham, along with shops, active travel links and community spaces.

The City and Environment Directorate outlined that the proposed changes would support “transport-oriented development” close to light rail, shops and jobs.

“[This would increase] housing density along transport corridors, support better use of existing infrastructure and encourage active travel. This will create a more connected, well-serviced and accessible neighbourhood,” it stated.

“The plan will help create medium to high-density homes, shops and community spaces, while retaining key recreation assets such as the racecourse.”

The precinct includes Thoroughbred Park as well as neighbouring sites such as the Canberra Riding and Pony Club, the Canberra Veterinary Hospital site, Kamberra Winery, land adjacent to Flemington Road and land adjacent to the Federal Highway.

The draft major plan amendment proposes rezoning part of the precinct to create a future urban area, which is where the future subdivision is likely to be located.

“This will encourage the staged delivery of development, supporting the future growth of the ACT over the better part of a decade,” the government statement read.

“The Thoroughbred Park precinct was identified as a category 2 change area through the Inner North and City District Strategy as it provides an opportunity to create well-connected homes and local amenities right near the city centre.”

READ ALSO Kingston Arts Precinct project takes step forward with subdivision DA

It also contains assessment outcomes and requirements to ensure the new buildings maintain the character of the precinct.

These requirements include limiting building heights to 18 metres and 24 metres across the precinct, requiring future development to minimise flood impacts from Sullivans Creek, establishing building setbacks of 24 metres from the Federal Highway road reserve, and mandating active travel through the site along Sullivans Creek, with consideration of active travel routes.

map of proposed rezoning

The rezoning proposal includes a high-density residential zone (in red), a local centre (labelled CZ4) and mixed-use areas (CZ5). Photo: ACT Government.

The Canberra Racing Club has described the major plan amendment as a “significant and positive move” for Thoroughbred Park, the Canberra racing industry and the community at large.

“[This] marks one of the most significant moments in the Club’s proud history – a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reimagine Thoroughbred Park and contribute meaningfully to Canberra’s future growth,” Canberra Racing Club chief executive Darren Pearce said.

“Seeking community feedback is a vital next step in our long-term vision to create more for the racing industry, our members, and the Canberra community that we’re proud to be part of.”

Mr Pearce said the draft major plan amendment was the result of more than six years of investigation, research and consultation.

“As one of Canberra’s key northern gateway sites and the starting point of the city’s northwest growth corridor, we recognise the responsibility and privilege that comes with developing this land,” he said.

“Our commitment is to ensure any future design is thoughtful, sustainable and seamlessly integrated with our racing and events precinct – creating a vibrant, connected destination where people can live, work and play.”

READ ALSO Don’t love Fix My Street? Why you shouldn’t expect another option anytime soon

Mr Pearce said support for the amendment would result in more support for the Canberra community.

“As a not-for-profit sporting club, any benefits from a supported major plan amendment and future development would be reinvested back into the club, our sport, our wide variety of events, and the broader community,” he said.

“We’re proud to now share this vision with the community and to support the Territory’s efforts to increase well-located housing close to light rail, amenities, services, and jobs.”

The plan could also make a large contribution towards the ACT Government’s target of 30,000 new homes by 2030.

Community feedback on the draft major amendment, labelled DPA-08, is open from 17 October to 1 December 2025 on the ACT Planning website.

A consultation report will be published after the notification period closes.

Join the conversation

49
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I gather this land was “gifted” by the government to the racecourse. How are they now allowed to make an enormous profit selling part of it to developers?
It should be compulsorily acquired and used for development especially social housing and community facilities and an alternate site found for a racecourse. If there is sufficient community support for it.
Cruel horse racing and gambling are not the future for our capital.

Spot on.
And given how much land is required for horseracing, the CRC should be paying for it themself, in competition with housing developers.

The government levies a lease variation charge to capture most of the uplift in land value for the exact reason you describe.

Capital Retro3:41 pm 20 Oct 25

Are you saying “never look a gift horse in the mouth”?

Chewy14 is quite pathetic in his unflinching support for our city’s clubs (and churches). Industries that have been unequalled in their corruption, stealing more taxpayer dollars and public lands from its citizens like no others. Industries that sit on some of our city’s most expansive and lucrative landholdings, gifted to them by previous conservative governments. Industries that have accumulated their significant wealth through their policies of prejudice and discrimination, property developments, tax exemptions and gambling revenues. Industries that have become protected species, immune from any criticisms and shielded by our parliamentarians who scramble to safeguard their interests.

Now chewy is trying to claim that the clubs will be pulling their weight by paying lease variation charges which captures most of the uplift in their land values.

I do wonder what personal interests chewy has in his ongoing and pathetic support for our clubs and their business practices?

Flip, flop! chewy14 the hypocrite!

Hack the hypocrite is back after being thoroughly embarrassed with his tail between his legs.

Still waiting for some direct quotes for your claims Hack.

“Now chewy is trying to claim that the clubs will be pulling their weight by paying lease variation charges which captures most of the uplift in their land values.”

😂 how on earth have you attempted to make a factual statement about the lease variation charge anything to do with your unhinged hatred of community groups?

Incidental Tourist12:07 pm 20 Oct 25

And who will buy it? To control the cost of living less and less people will want to buy homes in ACT.

Canberra 1947 Boy10:53 am 20 Oct 25

WOW this is good News as this development plan provides the best of both worlds – it ensures the Canberra Racing Club (CRC) can continue to provide the joys, excitement and economic benefits of Thoroughbred racing to the Canberra Community and provide an additional 6,000 dwellings to help address the ACT Housing crisis.
Racing is a part of Aussie culture and the horses at CRC are the best looked after animals in the ACT.

Imagine how many more homes could be built if the entire site was redeveloped.
Housing, not horse racing, is a practical necessity for Australians.

“Imagine how many more homes could be built if the entire site was redeveloped.”

An argument that could be used for every piece of open space in the ACT.

A horse track is not “open space”, it’s a private kingdom used once a week by millionaires

The proposed houses arent getting built on the horse track, which is the point

The second part of your comment being so hopelessly clueless, it doesnt need a response.

Most of these comments seem to assume that the racecourse will go, whilst this article suggests that it will stay and be operational.

I don’t know if it’s a lack of reading and comprehension skills or just a race to be first on here to type something witty about ‘choo-choo train set’ or ‘stop immigration stealing houses’.

Felix the Cat10:02 am 19 Oct 25

So the horse racing track is just going to close down and not relocate somewhere else and the track owners seem to quite happy and pleased about that?! Seems odd to me. I guess they have been offered a very good price for their land, but still, a whole industry just shutting down seems odd.

Yeah get rid of everything , how about we stop importing hundreds of so called skilled labour

I find it difficult to believe there is a viable racing industry in Canberra.
From the road I see with sadness the thoroughbreds kept in their tiny yards and stables next to the track. I can imagine the distressing habits these horses develop as they stand bored in their confinement such as wind sucking when they should have the freedom to naturally graze and frolic in decent sized paddocks.
It’s just plain cruel and I can’t even make myself describe what happens to so many at the end of their racing career. I would like to see the industry sell up for houses. The location has pros and cons though. I’m not sure if I would like to live so close to the noise of Summernats!

I read about this plan a couple of years ago. I have mixed feelings about this, it looks pissweak considering we’re supposed to be the nations capital but our horse racing course is being demolished to build homes. But at the same time it’s good to hear they’re building homes, but again it’s most likely those homes will be overpriced.

Get rid of the racecourse anyway. It’s a blight on our city.

Just get rid of the racecourse – we don’t need it! This is the obvious site for the new stadium.

I would have said that it’s an obvious site to extend EPIC into. With the right flexible fencing similar to what EPIC currently has and crossings over or under Flemington road it could serve as both.

Apparently some of the commentators dont realise this is privately held land, not a government property.

Chewy14 is at it again regularly changing his position depending on the weather, displaying his complete hypocrisy! Fuming against those he disagrees with and displaying the same condescending contempt he always does. Regularly in these columns uncritically supporting our city’s clubs (and churches) as they sell off and develop their expansive landholdings because “it is privately held land”. Some of our city’s most lucrative real estate, public lands stolen from ACT residents and gifted to them by previous conservative governments. Clubs and churches preying on the vulnerable, relying on gambling revenue, receiving government handouts and paying no taxes! chewy14, always raging against developers, particularly Geocon for developing their landholdings into much needed housing and thundering against the government for its planning and development proposals accusing them of stealing public lands!

Flip flop chewy’s hypocrisy is astounding!

What on earth is that unhinged rant supposed to be about Hack?

“chewy14, always raging against developers, particularly Geocon for developing their landholdings into much needed housing and thundering against the government for its planning and development proposals accusing them of stealing public lands!”

As usual, I challenge you to provide a direct quote to back up your deranged claims.

But of course we know that you can’t do that because I’ve never remotely claimed anything like this.

Flip Flop Hack trying to weakly attack others when his partisan hypocrisy gets called out, hilarious stuff 🤣 😆 😂

Direct quotes, Hack. Get busy if you don’t want to make yourself look more of a fool (which we all know is hard).

Incidental Tourist2:48 pm 20 Oct 25

Has the respect for the private property been a burden recently? Look at the hostile Calvary hospital takeover. Or depriving landlords right to take over their own property from tenants. They view private property as “stolen” asset which is pure Marxist playbook.

chewy is always misrepresenting and directing his ire towards me, and others who support development in this city. He has been relentless in his criticisms of the sale of the dilapidated and derelict pool site in Philip to Geocon and critical of the government and the new owners for its development plans. Not to mention his never-ending moaning against the light rail network and its expansion. Despite this, he supports our city’s clubs including the current proposals of the Thoroughbred Racing Club selling off and developing their expansive landholdings for much needed housing. He has also been silent on the sale of the Pitch & Putt in Woden, which was sold by the Southern Cross Club when they developed around 1,500 multi-storey residential units on Yamba Drive while critical of the government for doing the same.

chewy’s hypocrisy is there for all to see!
Here is a thread where chewy responds to one of my comments where I support development for much needed housing in Woden, accusing me of using rabid right-wing points for development on any and all open space(s) (public lands) and community areas:
https://region.com.au/mayor-of-woden-seeks-to-revitalise-southside-western-town-centres-after-election-win/820208/

In a response to a proposal on the Philip Pool site he is again whingeing at the further loss of community facilities and the building of “moar” apartments in the Woden area and degradation of community facilities:
https://region.com.au/geocon-announces-plans-for-brand-new-aquatic-centre-in-woden/826930/

chewy14 supposedly did not support the Calvary Hospital acquisition and its development and here he is responding to one of my posts where I supported the government for not bowing to the distortions and grubbiness of the Liberals, the media, the Australian Christian Lobby and the Vatican church at the time:
https://region.com.au/formal-transition-of-calvary-public-hospital-bruce-to-act-government-begins/670944/

Here is chewy responding to another commentator in a total about face suggesting that the government takeover the Capital Public Golf course:
https://region.com.au/capital-public-golf-course-closure-reopens-development-debate/592390/

chewy14, in an ongoing, blustering and bizarre rant, was focusing his attentions on the miniscule and my (totally innocent) comments on the length of time the Canberra Racing Club has operated on the lands it currently sits on in Lyneham, gifted to them by the government in the early 1960’s.
Election over, Canberra Racing Club on track with housing development plans | Region Canberra

I am sure there are plenty more out there but I don’t have the time that chewy apparently has to look!

Once again Jack D blatantly lies when asked to provide direct evidence, he’s clearly spent hours attempting to find some evidence for his claims but only served to disprove them.

Tellingly avoiding direct quotes because he knows he can’t back his wild claims up.

Its truly getting sad now, maybe Hack should go for a walk in the fresh air outside the Legislative Assembly today rather than being cooped up all day.

Let’s take a look at the links.

First link, I supported proper planning and the government’s role in creating liveable communities with access to community facilities.

Jack supported unfettered development, rejected evidence based public transport decisions and attacked politicians who don’t agree with his partisan positions.

Second link is the same.

Third link, i’ve got to laugh when Hack’s claimed direct evidence is that he think i “supposedly” think something, freely admitting you dont know because he’s making stuff up.

Once again i supported following proper processes and planning.

Fourth link i once again supported the provision of community facilities and liveability for local residents over unfettered development.

The owner of this site having bought and sold the land multiple times after having the development proposals rejected repeatedly. With no intention to meet the lease and use terms, degrading the community facility and attempting to force the government’s hand.

Hilarious stuff Jack, that’s the best you’ve got? 😂😂😂

Even though this is a completely different proposal at the racecourse, you can see how the plan is to integrate additional housing whilst maintaining the recreational and community use of the site rather than replacing it. A better overall outcome for liveability and planning.

Oh dear Hack, there’s shooting yourself in the foot and then there’s whatever your last comment is.

The unhinged and partisan rants probably look better on you.

And that’s not a compliment.

“He has also been silent on the sale of the Pitch & Putt in Woden, which was sold by the Southern Cross Club when they developed around 1,500 multi-storey residential units on Yamba Drive while critical of the government for doing the same.”

Oh, I missed this bit, Jack thinks that there being no thread on the issue means he can make stuff up.

I believe the almost complete loss of the community facilities on the Southern Cross club site was a poor outcome, with little thought about long term services and liveability for future residents, including alternative options within the area.

Oh dear Hack, your made up ad hominems and strawmen dont substitute for an actual point.

Make it bigger. Get rid of the racecourse. Your hobby is not a priority in a housing crisis and this area could be a mini-city serviced by the tram.

You have a point. To be consistent, we could also build high density accommodation where the National Gallery is, and perhaps drain LBG to build apartments there as well! After all, your hobby is not a priority in a housing crisis.

The NGA is a publicly funded space that is open to anyone all year. As is LBG. Please try harder

I just love reading the negative comments. This area is not in Antone’s backyard

Yes Greg. A prime site for housing development that impacts on no-one but still people complain. And if course they’ll catch the tram. It fast, frequent and smooth. Robert Henderson

Capital Retro3:13 pm 17 Oct 25

Wow, a few acres with the population of Cooma.

Yeah, let’s do it.

Will future residents have to sign a form acknowledging that they live near a festival site and that they accept that it can be very noisy for a few days a few times a year?

Better still one of the things Canberra needs for future growth is a bigger Exhibition Park. The easy answer to that would be to have a crossing or two over or under Flemington Road to connect it to the existing Epic.

A tunnel connecting to EPIC would be best.

Capital Retro11:46 am 20 Oct 25

A tunnel would be a subterranean river when there is high rainfall.

How about a monorail?

chrisjeanemery2:11 pm 17 Oct 25

I expect this will be another case of avoiding the change of purpose costs for friends.

If this government was serious about address housing affordability, they’d stop pumping $8.5 million a year into an unviable ‘sport’, let the club fold and develop the entire site into housing.

They get that money and more from the wagering! Plenty of other sports

Yeah you may want to do a bit of research. Government actually receive over $50 million per year from this ‘unviable’ sport whilst dishing out $8.5 million. And no I am not part the racing community

no, the tax revenue generated from racing at this track is about $250,000 a year.

no, they don’t. the tax revenue generated for the ACT from racing at this track is about $250,000 a year

Canberra 1947 Boy1:18 pm 20 Oct 25

Mary, If you check – you will learn that the agreement between jurisdictions is that the betting on Racing is for each jurisdiction to benefit from the betting on their product (Racing) in their jurisdiction. That makes perfect sense while the claims about Racing only generating $250K at this track is either very uninformed rubbish or more likely mischievous nonsense. Don’t be fooled, every State shares the Betting on Racing in Canberra with their Racing clubs and expects and agrees that Betting on their races in the ACT will be shared by the ACT Government with Canberra Racing. The funds the ACT Government receives from Racing is many times greater than the small amount that the ACT Government provides to compensate for selling off the TAB that was set up to fund Racing. Further, the States have all established Point of Consumption Tax and share it with their Racing clubs while the ACT Government does not return a cent of POC to Racing.

So we just keep re-zoning all recreation areas until nothing is left! …and make sure it’s re-zoned for housing because that’s what’s in demand at the moment! Forget about whether or not the people who will live in that rubbish want to go outside sometime… they will only want to catch the bloody tram anyway!

What’s the recreation here? Horse racing? A sport for millionaires in the middle of one of the best housing sites in the city? Get rid of it.

I understand your concern but how often did you go to this place to race your horse around the track?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.