27 November 2025

Parliament winds up with an Albo win over environmental protection laws

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
17
Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister of Australia

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is delighted his government secured a deal with the Greens to pass controversial environmental protection laws. Photo: Thomas Lucraft.

It took until the very last day of the parliamentary sitting year, but the Federal Government has got its overhaul of Australia’s environmental protection laws over the line.

Following a deal struck between Labor and the Greens, which cut the Coalition out of negotiations altogether, Anthony Albanese secured an end-of-year political victory to get the legislation through the Senate.

There have been numerous failed attempts over successive governments to update the nation’s environmental protection act.

The Prime Minister began Thursday (27 November) by describing it as a “landmark day” and the beginning of “a new era” for the environment and productivity in this country.

“It is also a good day for business in this country by providing more certainty, reducing delays and making sure that we get better outcomes and improved productivity,” he said.

“We have consulted extensively with the business community, with environmental groups and with community organisations.

“More than five years after Professor Graeme Samuel handed down his independent review into the nation’s 25-year-old environmental laws that were widely acknowledged as not being fit for purpose, the government’s Environment Protection Reform Bill will be passed by the Senate today.”

To secure the bill’s successful passage through the Senate, the government had to agree to include native forest logging in national environment standards within 18 months; set up a $300 million support fund for the forestry industry; and remove any sunset exemptions from the legislation for high-risk land-clearing and regional forestry agreements.

It also conceded to the Greens’ request for the legislation to prevent fast-tracking of coal and gas projects, and to keep such development approval powers with the Commonwealth rather than the states.

READ ALSO Trust in Labor’s economic management is up, but so too is inflation

The Prime Minister praised the Greens’ approach to the negotiations, which concluded on Wednesday.

“I must say that the Greens showed maturity in that [there were] a range of things that they wanted they didn’t get,” he said.

“And I must say that the Greens were very constructive in those negotiations yesterday, and I thank them for it.”

The PM said he had offered to meet with Sussan Ley over the Coalition’s proposed amendments to the bill, but the Opposition Leader didn’t take up that offer.

Ms Ley, however, said no such offer was extended, and she described the development as a “dirty deal” between Labor and the Greens.

“I want to make some brief remarks about the Labor-Greens alliance, which is back – back in business and working against communities’ interests in industry for the future, against jobs and most importantly, working against lower power prices for Australians,” she said.

“Because what is very clear from the reaction so far to the dirty deal done by the Labor Party with the Greens, a deal that wasn’t necessary to conclude today or this year, what is absolutely clear is that this is going to put energy prices up and provide further pressure on electricity bills for struggling households and families.

“For the simple reason that the Greens have got what they want. The Greens party has always been at war with gas.

“They’ve always been at war with the resources projects that make our country strong. That means communities and jobs are under threat.”

READ ALSO BoM-shell: $100 million website puts minister and bureau leadership under a cloud

Greens leader Larissa Waters said her party had secured changes to the legislation that will make it illegal for the federal Environment Minister to approve projects that have “unacceptable impacts” for the environment.

But they were unable to secure a climate impact trigger in the new laws, saying negotiations with the government were “firm and constructive”.

“We are very, very proud that we were able to stop the fast-tracking of coal and gas. That was an absolute red line for us,” Senator Waters said.

“We fought hard in these negotiations and were able to extract wins for nature.”

Greens environment spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young thanked Environment Minister Murray Watt for a constructive approach to the negotiations.

“The reason the Greens have come to this agreement with the government today is because we want to get things done,” she said.

Senator Watt said the reforms had been a “long time coming” and were finally being passed by Federal Parliament.

“These changes deliver that balanced package that we’ve talked about,” he said.

“To strengthen environmental protections and speed up the housing, renewables, critical minerals and other projects that we so desperately need.”

The new laws will establish a national environment protection agency and require development projects to report carbon emissions, but it specifically rules out a climate trigger that would prevent projects from going ahead.

They also allow for no-go zones where projects can be denied before applications are progressed.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

17
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

It’s a win for the left to increase the cost of living. Lefties will rejoice

Well it’s a win for the environment AND it comes with bonus schadenfreude at the cope from the petulant right as the LNP fail in their bid to make a deal with Labor on the new environment laws once again confirming the LNP’s irrelevance.

Stephen Saunders9:56 am 28 Nov 25

In Labor-Greens world, we can have endless population growth and gung-ho land clearing, then environmental offsets and net zero will fix thing.

You’re making even less sense than usual.

But from what is discernible, we don’t have “endless population growth”, immigration is trending down and our birth rate declining….our population growth is projected to decline.

https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/profile-of-australias-population

Also if you read the new laws they’re stopping “gung-ho land clearing”.

It’s a double win for Albo with Joyce likely defecting to One Nation and likely to be as successful as the Hanson/Latham merger. So the right of Australia will spend even more time talking about themselves because there’s nothing voters enjoy more than that. lol.

Always love that great political analysis. But a question – if the right are talking to each other, how would voters hear it ? Bit of a logic fail.

Penfold even if you don’t agree, if you can engage with the comment in good faith why bother?

Even by your low, low standards of desperately failed gotcha attempts this is a doozy.

Good faith, that’s gold.

Ah….Penfold, your initial non-contribution here is literally a bad faith, off-topic, lame, tedious and ultimately failed attempt at an insult Penfold.

I remind you again, you don’t have to beclown yourself, it’s not a requirement.

Such an obsession with clowns 🤡, does it suggest time spent in a circus 🎪 ?

It suggests that those ‘L’s are starting to get to you because as ever you don’t anything worthwhile to contribute to the topic at hand…

Possibly because the topic de jour is often different to the one you think it is 🤣

Penfold, should’ve gone to specsavers. Seano said talking ABOUT themselves not amongst themselves. And for further clarification, and seano correct me if I am wrong: talking about themselves instead of their policies i.e. business as usual.

To your point, Seano, let’s say that LNP voter base is united against net zero and environmental protection laws (they aren’t). They have completely failed to represent their constituents in negotiating anything with labor. They are effectively de-clawed. “FuTuRe PrImE mInIsTeR” pauline wasn’t even there to have a voice for her constituents. But what is unfortunate is that now the greens probably just got a big confidence boost and will start their obstructive behaviours again soon.

“Possibly because the topic de jour is often different to the one you think it is “

Which is Penfoldian for “I still have nothing worthwhile to contribute here’s me being unrealistically smug and here’s an an emoji so you know where the ‘jokes’ are…”.

“and seano correct me if I am wrong: talking about themselves instead of their policies i.e. business as usual.”

100% that was the point, and I suspect even Penfold knew that, and he’s not embarrassing himself through ignorance here (although that’s fairly common) but because the comment hit home, he didn’t like it and always whenever something stings and/or he has no counter he resorts to this sort of bad faith misrepresentation of the comment and then attacks that.

It’s of course a weak tactic, but every time he does it it marks another easy win.

“But what is unfortunate is that now the greens probably just got a big confidence boost and will start their obstructive behaviours again soon.”

Yes it’s not good that opposition will remain focused on talking about themselves and policy. But I am encouraged by the Greens and their willingness to be practical whilst getting changes through to the new Environment Laws. The last election saw their votes remain steady but their seats go down and I suspect or rather hope there will be more of this pragmaticism. Hopefully the new Greens leadership have seen how underrepresented they are especially compared to the Nationals who they would trounce in a head to head contest and they’re trying to fix that underrepresentation.

How is this a win if we are digging up most of the environment to put in wind turbines and cables?

Well we’re not so there’s that, and the environmental impacts of turbines are less than that of coal fired power, which comes with coal mines, coal trains, coal trucks, emissions and air pollution (not to mention the higher costs and longer lead times).

As to cables…well I’m not sure how you expect to deliver electricity otherwise…but then when you’re an evangelist for one type of energy for culture wars reasons and not because science, technology and economics then it’s probably not surprising that you apparently believe these things happen via magic.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.