The Criminal Defence Lawyer's Memorial

rock lawyer spruiker
first we chuckle later chuck
advertising rocks

Jeez, that inscription is so far from any reality that I see. Self serving and delusional. “Fearless criminal defence advocates”? Strewtherama…

I suppose they can afford to be fearless simply because they actually have nothing to fear. They’re not the ones who’ll end up in the slammer if they cock up, so what’s the problem?

I imagine the fearful ones would actually be the perps, like those ADFA Skype idiots tho other day.

I think I may have just vomited a little in my mouth the same as when I read an article by that other ‘fearless advocate’ Jennifer Saunders. Pathetic.

banco said :

What do they have to fear? It’s not like we live in one of those banana republics where lawyers can get killed or go to jail for representing the wrong person.

Perhaps they fear some of their clients when the court decisions go against them!

Who or what are they afraid of? Their clients?

What do they have to fear? It’s not like we live in one of those banana republics where lawyers can get killed or go to jail for representing the wrong person.

He lists Peta Credlin as his most recent victory.

Aeek said :

So the RiotAct consensus is that everyone facing criminal charges is guilty ? Why even have trials then ?

A good idea .. Marge Simpson quoting her Uncle Arthur.

( Marge: Your Uncle Arthur used to have a saying. “Shoot em’ all and let God sort it out.” Unfortunately, one day he put his theory into practice. It took 75 federal marshals to bring him down. Now, let’s never speak of him again.

Proboscus said :

This proves what a mob of wankers the legal fraternity really is.

What defence lawyers “fearlessly” do is find loopholes in law to try and get their scumbag clients more lenient sentences. They are no better than the scum they represent.

couldnt say it better myself.

This is truly a statement on how delusional the legal community are.

Aeek said :

So the RiotAct consensus is that everyone facing criminal charges is guilty?

Well, you have to work pretty hard to get those charges in the first place.

Aeek said :

Why even have trials then ?

we live in this thing called a democracy. But it does seem a bit of a waste of time when we have multiple retrials with the same outcome.

So the RiotAct consensus is that everyone facing criminal charges is guilty ? Why even have trials then ?

One of the most distasteful advertising features I’ve ever seen.

I suppose an ethical defence lawyer would work hard to defend you if you were charged with urinating on this memorial.

Though would the police arrest you, or just wait their turn?

“in search of justice’. I would have thought ‘ to obtain justice’,,
and then being a plaque for criminal defence advocates; ” and to be appear before Justice Higgy”..

In honour of those who bend the truth for crimey motherfuckers.

This proves what a mob of wankers the legal fraternity really is.

What defence lawyers “fearlessly” do is find loopholes in law to try and get their scumbag clients more lenient sentences. They are no better than the scum they represent.

This new urinal is a bit out of my way but I will specially hold-on and make the trip when next out on the turps in Civic.