The Economist have this mini-guide to Canberra. Now while it gives a nice little potted history and things to do guide of Canberra for any executives or others visiting on the company/tax-payer dollar, I’m a bit bloody annoyed that we’re only a subset of the Sydney guide. Not to mention the article was probably written by someone who has only been North of the lake once (and that was to visit Mortis, which is why they think its still alive).
Red beast's return a wake-up call to put firefighting house in order
In fact TT, in the 1930s and 1940s there was an agreement between the ACT and NSW that 10000 acres… View
"Imagine" is indeed the operative word, franky. You chose a poor analogy franky but a raised good… View
Very cynical franky. Don't worry, I won't ever offer you medical advice. But when it comes to… View
Traffic jam concerns: Cheyne rejects pitch for lights at retirement village entrance
And the workers and visitors? Do they get to die there too? View
I looked at this very appealing development for an "end of life" option when it was advertised as… View
Tania Shaw my view is they all "have skin in the game" on this. Tara Cheyne has been served up a… View
2025 was a shocker for ACT Labor, and Barr's possible successor
Andrew’s eyeing-off Joh record View
Bobby Ramsey yeah nah. Her hands are tainted by the health department fiascos. View
Do Aussie car buyers really care about safety ratings? Suzuki is about to find out ...
So a selling point for the Fronx is big dash buttons. I think not. A one star ANCAP rating basically… View
And still is. That's the major part of the ANCAP assessment although you are correct electronic… View
Not so, to achieve a 5 star ANCAP rating the vehicle has to be crash tested ( in Australia). View


















