12 May 2025

Will the glass cliff be a thing for the Libs in choosing their next leader?

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
28
Sussan Ley campaigning in the 2025 election

Sussan Ley campaigning in the 2025 election. Will the Liberal Party install a woman leader so she can fall over the glass cliff at the next election? Photo: Sussan Ley Instagram.

Following its drubbing at the polls on 3 May, the Coalition is looking at the possibility of another decade on the Opposition benches.

There’s certainly next to no chance of it winning the next federal election in three years.

Armed with all that reality, the Liberals might make a woman their leader on Tuesday (13 May) – not out of any realisation that she could be the best person suited for the role, but because there’s no chance of her being successful.

Can’t have another man take the Libs to another devastating defeat, after all.

Would the rightwing powerbrokers of the party stand for that? Maybe they’d rather have a woman right now.

There’s a name for that kind of behaviour – it’s called “the glass cliff”.

It happens in politics, the public and private sectors, in male-dominated corporations, when it’s not the best of circumstances for anyone to be leading a particular organisation.

In other words, a professional woman can break through the glass ceiling only to quickly find out that it’s actually a cliff.

It basically describes the situation where a woman, or a member of another minority group, makes it to the top but only when the risk of failure is high and the likelihood of falling off the cliff is ever-present.

The term was coined by the Australian National University’s Michelle Ryan and colleague Alex Haslam when both were undertaking research at England’s University of Exeter.

Professor Ryan subsequently became the director of the ANU’s Global Institute of Women’s Leadership.

READ ALSO In a nationwide landslide, Labor was caught by surprise in Bean. How? Why?

The research into the glass cliff was named by The New York Times as one of the top 100 ideas that shaped 2008, and in 2016, the term itself – the glass cliff – was shortlisted as Word of the Year by the Oxford English Dictionary.

A perfect recent and very public example of it in the corporate world comes courtesy of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

As PwC Australia struggled with its worst-ever (self-inflicted) crisis after betraying public trust by sharing confidential Treasury information for its own gain, it installed an acting chief executive officer in 2023 – a woman, Kristin Stubbins.

But that was only until another good ol’ boy could be found to really take the helm, after the rough patch had settled down a bit, of course.

But back to the Liberals, and a new leader will be chosen on Tuesday from two lead contenders.

Current acting leader Sussan Ley is one, and shadow treasurer Angus Taylor is the other, and they look to be the only contenders at this stage. However, others could feasibly still throw their hats into the ring by the time the party room meets (Tim Wilson’s name has already been mentioned).

Sussan Ley wasn’t spectacularly effective as the Deputy Opposition Leader over the past term of parliament, while Angus Taylor wasn’t effective at all as shadow treasurer.

On the balance of things, you’d think Ms Ley had the better credentials and could claim more right to the job.

She might well get it, if only so the party can replace her after the next election when it might stand a better chance of winning something (anything) from Labor in the future.

Being the Opposition Leader in the next Federal Parliament will be a thankless and frustrating job with no great reward in sight.

No better circumstances for the dinosaurs in the Liberal Party to activate the glass cliff.

READ ALSO Glyn Davis to leave post as Australia’s top bureaucrat

The same can’t be said of the Greens, who must also choose another leader this week.

They’ve never had a problem with women in leadership roles, and when they meet to decide a replacement for Adam Bandt, who lost his seat of Melbourne, two women will likely be the top contenders.

But it won’t be a case of the glass cliff for the next leader of this minor party.

The Greens were wiped out in the House of Representatives, too, and are now back to being a party of the Senate.

They will have a balance of power in the Upper House and, from there, will have a significant influence on legislation.

If they make the most of the opportunity and don’t continue down the path of obstructionism for the sake of it, they can use it to rebuild their representation.

Unlike for the Liberals, the next leader of the Greens won’t be a placeholder position.

Sarah Hanson-Young is the natural choice for the next Greens leader.

She is the longest-serving federal Greens member and has proved her worth to the party.

Senator Hanson-Young is the Greens’ standout parliamentary performer, a clever strategist, and more level-headed than most of them.

This term of parliament is vital for the Greens if they are to regain momentum, and they need a leader who is not there by default.

No glass cliff waiting there.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
GrumpyGrandpa6:49 pm 12 May 25

I was surprised to read that Senator Jacinta Price, has thrown her support behind Angus Taylor.

To me, Senator Price, is very electable; Angus Taylor, not so much.

I think Sussan Ley might win the day.

Lol sure Grandpa but noted lefty journal the Australian Financial Review would disagree with you on Senator Price.

“If Jacinta Nampijinpa Price is the answer then the Liberal Party isn’t asking the right question.”

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/if-jacinta-price-is-the-answer-liberals-are-asking-wrong-question-20250511-p5ly6b

Stephen Saunders1:25 pm 12 May 25

Tim Wilson. Seriously.

Being a moderate Liberal myself I did not vote Dutton and will not vote Angus, If they ever want to win me back a moderate had to be elected to leader. That only leaves Susan. I also welcome a strong female leader and think it would be good for this country. I voted independent with a very heavy heart.

Gregg Heldon3:22 pm 12 May 25

Agree with everything you said and did.

There are parallels with the Australian Democrats. They put Natasha Stott Despoja in as leader. The media were besotted with her, calling her the new generation and the new young face of politics. But when the election was held the party was completely wiped out. I think the role of The Greens has been taken over by the independents and The Greens are as relevant to today’s Zeitgeist as Bob Brown in the Franklin River blockade in 1982. It will take a while to clean them out of the Senate because of the extended terms that senators have, but to quote the shampoo commercial – it won’t happen overnight but it will happen

Meg Lees blames everyone else for the demise of the Dems but she broke the “keep the bastards honest” trust when she sided with Howard on the GST. Hard to keep the that trust when you’ve joined the bastards.

If Sarah Sea Patrol is the Greens best option it shows how shallow the pool is. Notably the ACT was their worst election jurisdiction, couldn’t even get 1/4 of a quota.

As for the Libs well what a bizarre article. Having criticised them for years over women’s issues, we now read that electing their first female leader would be tokenism. Go figure.

Given the history of new opposition leaders becoming Prime Minister after a wipeout election loss is 0% it is tokenism.

John Coleman1:40 pm 12 May 25

A foolish but persistent idea. Dutton certainly had a chance to make the current government a one-term one. Imagine if he was only the stand-in to do damage to the other side until the chance was greater.

The logic of your point doesn’t add up: if Ley is appointed it’s tokenism. If Taylor is appointed they clearly want him to win next time. Do the circumstances differ there? Or just the gender?. In the same way the only good women leaders are the ones on the left, so it is suspicious ‘glass cliff’ tokenism if the right appoints a woman and true heart-warming equality if it’s the left.

I have no doubt that if the LNP had gone to Bishop following Turnbull’s demolition (which contrary to being a question of gender – replacing one moderate with another was not really the aim of that coup or its desperate pragmatic counter), pundits would have called it ‘the glass cliff’ given the circumstances. When the analysis is ideological to the point of risible, you can’t win.

And yet Dutton didn’t make the current government a one-term one….in fact…*checks notes*….he strengthened their position…and it wasn’t even close. The suggestion that Dutton almost beat history after last week’s flogging, based on early polling, now that’s risible.

You can claim to have “no doubt” that if Bishop had been promoted “pundits would have called it ‘the glass cliff’ given the circumstances”, but the simple fact is she wasn’t promoted and the counterargument is the Liberals weren’t about to promote a woman to the Prime Ministership.

The Liberals have a long history of pre-selecting women for safe Labor seats they have no chance of winning and passing over women for safe Liberal seats.

The Liberals are also likely at least two elections away from a comeback, whoever leads now is extremely unlikely to ever be PM, so to suggest a party that has historically displayed tokenism isn’t being tokenistic by finally promoting a women to leader as a place holder for whoever leads in 2031 is comic self delusion.

John Coleman5:02 pm 12 May 25

Saying there was a chance, and saying there was a chance by election date after the LNP’s folly and inexperience became manifest are obviously different points. I didn’t make the last one. Polls at several points showed a chance of at least serious damage to the government. Abbott was not the first Opposition Leader after 2007 it’s true, but he substantially damaged a shoed-in government in 2010 after one term, and was still at the helm in 2013.

‘The counterargument’ for Bishop is unsubstantiated and based on a ‘well they just wouldn’t have’ vibe and heedless to the facts of the situation. We have the testimony of her fellow-moderate and Turnbull ally Christopher Pyne on this. Interestingly he wasn’t an option for leader despite his seniority; I suppose ‘the counterargument’ would suggest he sometimes sounded feminine?

Your final point must also apply in the event they appoint Angus Taylor, because regardless of whether it’s Ley or Taylor the electoral prospects remain the same and out of either’s control. But only one can be a glass cliff appointment? The other must be sincere – because he’s a man.

So a more plausible explanation again: Ley and Taylor are two of the most senior Liberals who survived. The LNP’s more moderate pews want Ley, the more conservative pews want Taylor-Price. Actually where does Price fit in here? Would that be a glass cliff appointment?

You’re literally making it up John, at least my counterarguments are based on what has happened historically.

No opposition leader has won following a landslide, whoever leads the Liberals now will almost certainly not be Prime Minister. But I’ll ask you this, had the election been close despite Dutton losing his seat would Ley have any legitimate chance of becoming Liberal leader and potentially the next female Prime Minister of Australia? Don’t kid yourself.

As for Price, she’s running for Deputy Liberal leader it’s apples and oranges. Most punters don’t even know who the Liberal deputy is or even that one exists…although I suspect that will change if Price wins it. lol.

PS. If the Liberals elect Price as their deputy they will deserve everything they get.

John Coleman9:28 pm 12 May 25

Your counterarguments border on suggesting there is a spell that can’t be broken, rather than interrogating the facts in each case.

In answer to your conspiratorial question about a Dickson loss in mildly more promising circumstances, would Ley as a senior Minister have been in the running for the leadership against Taylor as she is now? Yes. I’m not subscribing to some dark vibe otherwise because you have not made it out.

Good to know that we’re clear on the dissonance that if Taylor-Price wins the leadership struggle, as they very well might, the glass cliff wasn’t there.

Your sophistry that the glass cliff doesn’t apply to deputy leadership positions is convenient, but bizarre insofar as the reasoning you’ve given: what does the salience of that role to punters have to do with anything? I thought glass cliff appointments concern internal politicking about the prospects of it working out? You were prepared to apply it to backwater preselections in red seats in an earlier comment.

As I said earlier, this is ideological to the point of risible. Australia’s first leadership team with an Indigenous woman is something to be feared and the alternative (a woman as leader and maybe a gay, Wilson, as deputy) is of course the glass cliff in action. What other explanation could there be? It’s the right.

There is much that can be said about the respective merits of each alternative (and you’ve even touched on it with Taylor-Price) – but that involves dropping this lazy, feckless analysis.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.