15 January 2026

Gun reform causing more headaches for opposition parties

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
22

Labor’s linking of gun buy-back legislation to hate law reforms in one piece of legislation is proving problematic for the Coalition. Photo: ACT Policing.

Proposed gun reforms are causing grief inside the Coalition, with the Nationals vehemently opposed to a further clamp down on firearms ownership.

The Federal Opposition is scrutinising the sweeping hate crimes and gun legislation to be debated in parliament when it is recalled next week.

It does not, however, want to be seen to be blocking measures designed to crack down on race-fuelled crimes in the wake of the Bondi shootings.

But with the bill being all-encompassing, combining both the hate and gun laws in one piece of legislation, the Liberals and Nationals are having another internal struggle.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has already blasted Anthony Albanese for combining the two components.

“We are deeply sceptical of the Prime Minister’s decision to introduce a single bill that will attempt to cover multiple complex and unrelated policy areas,” she said when the legislation was initially flagged this week.

“For example, issues of speech are clearly separate from the ownership and management of firearms.”

But her Liberals are still likely to pass the bill, albeit with some nays and rumblings from the backbench.

It’s the Nationals who are having more than a few major problems with the idea.

READ ALSO Commonwealth royal commission into Bondi was the only choice

Nationals Leader David Littleproud has accused Mr Albanese of employing petty politics in planning to introduce one omnibus bill.

Mr Littleproud said the laws concerned complex policy areas that should have individual pieces of legislation.

“This is puerile, petty, puerile, university politics by the Prime Minister,” he told Sky News.

“He’s angry. He’s angry with Australians, that they forced him into a royal commission. So what he’s done is reverted to a type of university politics that’s just petty.

“The legislation around hate speech is complex, as is gun laws. And the reality is to try and put them into one bill disrespects the parliament and actually flies in the face of his words about bringing the parliament together in a cooperative way.”

Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie has criticised the short amount of time being given to work through the bill before Federal Parliament votes.

And she said taking guns from law-abiding citizens was not the appropriate response to Bondi.

“Unfortunately, the Prime Minister has chosen to play politics with this bill,” she told Radio National.

“He’s lumped migration changes in with the management of firearms and obviously in with hate speech laws.

“So there’s a lot to unpack and not enough time before we debate it …

“State ministers met with the Federal Government last week and you know, I don’t think there’s unanimity amongst them about their response to the gun buy-back at all.”

While the Liberals and Nationals continue to publicly blame Labor for the omnibus nature of the bill, inside the Coalition the two opposition parties are at loggerheads over how to react to it when it comes time to vote.

Some, such as former Nationals leader Michael McCormack have even reportedly suggested the issue could split the Coalition again.

READ ALSO Kevin Rudd could have been regarded as a Labor hero, but some in the party still loathe him

Meanwhile, the Federal Government maintains its insistence the bill be one piece of legislation and be dealt with quickly.

“Our government has called a Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion but we are not waiting for its findings to combat hatred or keep Australians safe,” the Prime Minister wrote in an op-ed article to mark the one-month anniversary of the Bondi shootings.

“Next Monday, we are recalling parliament to introduce new laws.

“The terrorists at Bondi Beach had antisemitic hatred in their minds and high powered guns in their hands – and our laws will deal with both.

“We will target hate speech and hate preachers to counter radicalisation and extremism.

“Because just as antisemitism and racism are an offence against our Australian values, we will make sure they are an offence under Australian law.

“The parliament will also continue the work our government is doing to bring our nation’s world-leading gun laws into the 21st century.

“We will work with the states and territories to establish a National Gun Buyback Scheme and close loopholes in Australia’s gun laws that undermine our community safety and our national security.

“Because there is no reason for a person living in the suburbs to own six guns. There is no way an extremist should be able to buy high-powered weapons over the counter.

“And if someone has not earned the privilege of Australian citizenship, then they should not have the right to own a gun.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Stephen Saunders8:51 am 16 Jan 26

In security terms, the Akrams were hiding in plain sight, protected by their “diversity”. When the fake politics over the fake hate-bill is all done, Australia will still have indiscriminate mass migration with world levels of rental pain and housing un-affordability. As intended.

It’s a headache because it was not well thought out. Knee jerk reaction.

You’ve got to laugh at the partisan idiots who’ve been screaming at the government for the last month to move quicker on new legislation now backpedalling that more consideration and time is needed for what is a complex policy issue.

Just highlights that they never actually cared about the issue, they just wanted to attempt to extract some political points.

Bill’s dead, the greens have now opposed it.

I’m looking forward to tomorrow’s news where gun reform has become a large self-inflicted headache for the Prime Minister.

Reinforcing the gun laws should be a specific, detailed & well thought through stand alone legislation not tacked on to anything else.

The coalition thought they were winning at politics, they thought some fast balls would take the stumps but albo has effectively hit it to the boundary. They were so vocal about creating laws, so he has intentionally coupled it all together knowing that the opposition will be divided over it. Effectively making the ones calling for action now the ones opposed to action. Making the ones in favour of fast, rash decision making suddenly become advocates of taking time and thinking things through. He’s exposed their strategy for all to see. Oppose, oppose, oppose.

franky, a sensible comment, well said. Yes how a government could muddle guns and speech restrictions into one piece of legislation is baffling to say the least.

And to try to wedge their opponents at the same time, well that tricky Albo is proving again that he struggles with leadership concepts and the team around him hasn’t got much of a clue either.

“Because there is no reason for a person living in the suburbs to own six guns.” rubbish! hell I live in the suburbs and own farmland in NSW and own more than 6 and the firearms registry has never had a problem with me owning several. Why now are more than 4 a problem?

Why do you need six?

The Firearms Registry didn’t have a problem because they apply the law. The law is gong to change.

Ok thats a fair question. A person might require more than 4 for club use, lets say 2 handguns for pistol club, 2 shotguns for clays, 1 or 2 smallbore (.22) rifles for club use, that person might be also a member of the black powder club, another couple of guns there. not to mention a hunting rifle or two. One of my rifles I have owned for 50 years and it might get turned into scrap metal because some fool wants the laws changed.

What’s it to you , why can’t people just mind there own business

This is going to be a repeat of the environmental protection bill, coalition are talking themselves out of the negotiation room.
Liberal MPs are now soiling themselves at the prospect of there being laws against inciting racial hatred. Hmmm wonder why?

Because inciting racial (and other) hatred is a big proportion of their policy platform. Ever since Andrew Bolt was convicted of being a racist liar, they’ve been trying to make racial hatred entirely legal again.

Capital Retro9:26 am 15 Jan 26

“antisemitic hatred”?

Who writes this stuff for Albo?

CR that’s probably the whacky murpharoo. Normally she’d be prepping for the Adelaide Writers Festival about now but alas this year she’s likely masterminding Albo’s brilliant bringing together of all political parties in a multi-partisan display of political kumbaya where he shows the nation how much he’s learned from the national thwacking he received before he called the Royal Commission. What could possibly go wrong 😊

The real story here is what a dogs breakfast Albanese is making of the legislation. We all know he’s been trying to blame Bondi on guns, most of Australia has called him out on it.

Average effort here Chris to try to beat this up into an opposition fracture. Not your best work unfortunately.

Most of Australia recognises that lax gun laws made the Bondi mass murder easier and more lethal. You don’t need a level action shotgun with an eight-shot capacity, or 4+ guns, you just want them.

That’s true Pete, the laws did make it easier. But the gun laws didn’t fill the crazies heads with hatred, they didn’t make people chant at the Opera House, march across the harbour bridge yelling “death to the IDF”, they didn’t encourage people to attack synagogues and they didn’t tell the government to take one side in a struggle 10,000 miles away.

Most of Australia recognises that lax gun laws made the Bondi mass murder easier and more lethal. You don’t need a lever action shotgun with an eight-shot capacity, or 4+ guns, you just want them.

The perpetrators of the mass murder weren’t convinced to do anything by any marches or protests or chants. They were influenced by Daesh.

The people who attacked synagogues appear to have been paid by Iran. Again, nothing to do with the marches against genocide.

“Death to the IDF”? That’s the Israeli military. Not Jewish people at a beach. Would you have an issue with someone in the 1940s shouting “Death to the Wehrmacht”?

The good news Peter is that the Royal Commission will now start getting to the bottom of the motivations of the Bondi attackers and Australian anti-semitism in general. There’s a fair chance that there will be significant local factors involved.

As to your other points – chances are that the Israeli Defence Force is predominantly made up of Jewish people, who weren’t the instigators of October 7 unlike September 1 (1939). As for all the local attacks yes that tobacco bloke locked up in Iraq and paid for by Iran does seem responsible for some, but certainly not all of them. Claiming there’s been no influence by local factors is just naïve and premature. Perhaps you were referencing Ireland.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.