24 April 2025

Dutton promises big increase in defence spending if elected

| Andrew McLaughlin
Join the conversation
13
Hastie & Dutton

Peter Dutton (right) with Shadow Defence Minister Andrew Hastie (left) in Perth. Photo: Peter Dutton Facebook.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has pledged to increase Australia’s defence spending over the next five years by an additional $21 billion if he’s elected on 3 May.

While short on detail, Mr Dutton’s announcement would take defence spending to 2.5 per cent of Australia’s GDP, ahead of Labor’s planned 2.3 per cent by 2033.

On top of that, he says he aspires to further increase spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2040, which would see Australia’s annual defence budget easily exceed $100 billion.

Mr Dutton said it had been more than a decade since Australia had a National Security Strategy, and that the world looks very different today than it did back then.

“It is past time we confronted our new strategic reality, and our Strategy will serve as a roadmap to guide the difficult decisions we will need to make to protect Australia’s interests in the years ahead,” he said.

Perhaps because it too was short on detail and was essentially a collation of announcements already made, Mr Dutton appeared to overlook the fact that the Labor Government released a somewhat underwhelming National Defence Strategy in April 2024, just a year after publishing its Defence Strategic Review.

And despite both sides promising to increase spending, a large proportion of that new money is going towards the planned nuclear-powered submarines Australia will acquire under AUKUS Pillar 1, while neither side has been able to articulate how it will address ongoing shortfalls in ADF recruitment targets.

READ ALSO Third leaders’ debate draws out softer sides, for a brief moment or two

“It will be an important expenditure because we need to keep our country safe,” Mr Dutton told the media alongside Shadow Defence Minister Andrew Hastie in Perth.

“And if we’re to preserve peace and stability in our region — and to be a good ally with partners — Australia needs to invest in defence.

“We need to make sure that whatever confronts us in the coming decades, we can stare it down and that’s exactly what a Coalition government will do,” he said.

Shadow Minister for Home Affairs Senator James Paterson said the government’s most important duty is to keep Australians safe.

“In an increasingly uncertain world, we need to be clear-eyed about the challenges facing our country, and we must fiercely protect our values and interests,” he said.

“An overarching National Security Strategy will prompt a long-overdue national conversation about what security means for Australia, and provide clarity to our security agencies and policymakers as they navigate the challenges in the decades ahead.”

The allocation of the additional funds has yet to be announced. However, Mr Dutton has previously stated he would look to buy an additional squadron of Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning combat aircraft to augment the current three combat and one training squadrons the RAAF already operates. But that announcement failed to say whether these would augment or replace the RAAF’s current 24 F/A-18F Super Hornets.

He said that a new Coalition Government’s Defence Strategic Review would examine an overarching vision for Australia’s security, the core objectives that support this vision, the key risks to Australia’s national security, an assessment of the global threat environment, and Australia’s national security priorities. Interestingly, all of these issues were taken into account in Labor’s 2024 Review.

READ ALSO Australian defence industry contracts for multinational F-35 program top $5 billion

In response to Mr Dutton’s announcement, Defence Minister Richard Marles questioned how the figure of 2.5 per cent would be achieved.

“There is no explanation of how they’re paying for this, where the money is coming from,” he told ABC News Breakfast on 23 April.

“Nor really is there an explanation of what the money is being spent on, and this is entirely consistent with what the Liberals did when they were in government, when we came in.

“We’ve engaged in the biggest peacetime increase in defence spending since the Second World War,” Mr Marles added.

“That’s the fact of the matter, and it’s not some vague commitment. It’s not a target, it’s not an aspiration, it’s in the budget. It is a much bigger increase than anything we saw from the Liberals when they were in government.”

As politicians of both persuasions have been saying since the Morrison Government’s 2018 Strategy, Australia is facing the most complex and serious strategic circumstances since 1945. These risks have been highlighted by China’s increasing belligerence in the region and in particular towards Taiwan, Japan, India, and its Southeast Asian neighbours in the South China Sea.

Further afield, the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia has seen new forms of warfare such as cheap drone attacks proliferate, while China, Russia and other countries are increasingly conducting grey-zone attacks in the cyber domain and are disrupting satellite and underwater lines of communication.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The previous hawkish coalition government destroyed a lot our export industry, and now this, at a time when our living standards are continuing to drop. Dutton is no different from what he was back then.

This is a good point with Labor only recently having re-established our wine trade with China.

With Trump’s hubris and his lack of understanding of even basic economic principles absolutely wrecking America’s economy over trade, to the point were they’re about to experience empty shelves, mass job losses and business closures last thing Australia needs is the Trump admiring Dutton.

Especially as Dutton not only stood idly by while Morrison’s ill-judged attacks on China resulted directly in Australian job and businesses losses but contributed with his Trumpian conspiracy theory mongering.

I support the increase in defence spending if it’s allocated sensibly (already an issue for a clueless, flip flopping culture warrior like Dutton) but where’s the money coming from?

It won’t come from the fossil fuel industry that gets away with paying next to nothing for our resources it, it’ll come the poor, battlers and the working class.

Dutton will only look after rich people like himself.

Capital Retro4:39 pm 24 Apr 25

Seano, the money is coming from the same place Labor are getting their net-zero renewables funded and we all know where that is.

Something you’ve made up Capital?

Renewables are the cheapest form of energy Capital, if you don’t like cheap energy vote Dutton.

Capital Retro8:21 pm 24 Apr 25

Albo would be jealous of that meaningless response, Seano.

Yeah it’s not meaningless to point out that renewables are the cheapest form of energy champ. This is backed by clear evidence.

Dutton’s nuclear plan is also not going to happen, the Energy Generators & Retailers and the QLD LNP govt have said no, two points you continually scuttle away from.

Therefore Dutton has no energy plan (which is why he’s avoiding talking about it during the campaign). A vote for Dutton is a vote for another period of coalition stagnation on energy investment, a vote for Dutton is a vote for higher energy prices.

PS. You can of course challenge any of this Capital but we both know that the best you’ll do is either silence or some sad snide comment like the one above because you can’t challenge reality.

@Seano
Actually, Seano, should Dutton get into government, the first hurdle he has to jump, is repealing Howard’s 1998 National Radiation and Nuclear Safety Act, which, after allowing the nuclear medical facility to be built at Lucas Heights, banned any more nuclear facilities from being built in Australia. Given at best, Dutton will have a hostile Senate, his chances of repealing said legislation would be doubtful.

Yes I’d forgotten about that @JustSaying even in the same Senate that Albo has Dutton would be very unlikely to get the bill through let alone an openly hostile Senate.

And let’s not forget people in places like the Hunter are absolutely ropeable about the prospect of a reactor in their area with no say and no choice in the matter….knowing the Hunter as I do it’s never going to happen there.

Capital Retro2:48 pm 25 Apr 25

I keep challenging my increasing power bills Seano but the energy companies just refer me to someone named Bowen after they confirm that yes, the amount on the bill is real.
Can you help me out, mate?

It’s not my fault that you don’t understand the energy market Capital despite having the evidence shown to you many times, but renewables are the cheapest form of energy and the only thing that kept a lid on power prices after a long period of stagnation in investment under the coalition government.

With Dutton’s nuclear plan in ruins a vote for Dutton is a vote for another period of stagnation in energy investment and therefore higher energy prices.

Capital Retro, wholesale price in the energy market is set by the highest price bid which will be coal or gas, sometimes hydro. Retailers rely on longer term averaged prices.

Renewables have both lower capital costs and low operating costs, to which are being added energy capture of excess renewables in pumped hydro and of course batteries of 4 and soon 8 hour supply durations. They win. It is simple economics, which business can understand.

So he hates Canberra, public servants, women, uni students, EV owners, renewable energy – but he’s all in favour of guns & war.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.