18 June 2025

PM says it's understandable Trump stood him up (but he did meet other world leaders)

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
53
Keir Starmer and Anthony Albanese at the G7

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Anthony Albanese at the G7 … but the meeting with the US president was a no-go. Photo: Anthony Albanese Facebook

Anthony Albanese and his Cabinet are downplaying the snub the Prime Minister got from the US president at the G7, but after all the hype in the lead-up to the planned bilateral chat, it’s an embarrassing turn of events for the Federal Government.

Donald Trump left the G7 Summit in Canada immediately after the leaders’ dinner on Tuesday (Australian time) and gave no prior notice that he wouldn’t be meeting the Prime Minister.

His press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said he was returning to Washington “to attend to many important matters” and took to social media to explain the early exit.

“President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer,” she wrote on Twitter/X.

“Much was accomplished, but because of what’s going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.”

Moments before that Tweet went out, Mr Albanese was telling reporters how much he was looking forward to meeting with the President.

“I look forward to the meeting and I look forward to it taking place,” the Prime Minister said.

Once he got the real word, however, the PM has since played it down.

His office says it is “understandable” given the current developments in the Middle East, and that the Australian Government is also “very concerned” about these developments.

READ ALSO PM drops into Amazon HQ to say thanks for $20b for AI

Defence Minister and Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles also used the term “completely understandable” to describe the US President’s return to Washington sooner than expected.

“This is essentially the American President needing to deal with what is obviously playing out in the world today,” Mr Marles said.

“We feel very confident about where the relationship is going with the Trump Administration.

“We understand the circumstances of this moment, and I’m sure that in the not-too-distant future, you’ll see a meeting between the two leaders.”

Treasurer Jim Chalmers also showed no signs of surprise when asked about it.

“This was always a chance of happening given what’s happening around the world, particularly in the Middle East,” Dr Chalmers said.

“I don’t think it’s especially surprising. I do think it’s understandable given the events that are unfolding in a really dangerous part of the world.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong also came to the PM’s defence.

“We were amongst a number of countries whose bilateral meetings were not able to proceed because of world events,” she said.

“And in particular, regional events in the Middle East required Trump’s attention. We understand that.”

But while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley agrees the situation might be understandable, she says the Prime Minister should have been trying harder sooner to secure a meeting with Mr Trump.

Not relying solely on an international summit would have been a better plan to pursue, she suggested

And failing to meet with the President is Australia’s loss.

“Given the deteriorating situation in the Middle East, this decision is understandable but to the detriment of Australia,” Ms Ley said.

“This was an important opportunity for the Prime Minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs.

“The Prime Minister should have been more proactive in seeking to strengthen this relationship — Australia’s most important — and we encourage him to change his approach to advance our national interest.”

READ ALSO Latest Services Australia data keeping customers and the Minister happy

During a later photo shoot later in the day, Mr Trump was asked about his early departure from the summit.

“I have to be back as soon as I can,” he said.

“You probably see what I see and I have to be back as soon as I can.”

The early exit meant Mr Trump had to also cancel meetings with some other leaders attending the summit, some of whom, however, he had met with before.

The President appeared to express his support for AUKUS when asked about it during a joint press conference with Mr Starmer.

The US has initiated a review of the trilateral submarine agreement.

This morning’s meeting (Australian time) would have been Mr Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with the President, although they have had three phone calls together.

There is no word yet on when the meeting might be rescheduled.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

53
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon9:09 pm 18 Jun 25

Unless Albanese is ready to back down on his “we will decide” plagiarism of Howard and commit to a somewhat higher percentage of GDP spend on defence, it might be just as well not to appear too keen to get a meeting with Trump – maybe wait until his administration takes the relationship sufficiently seriously to send an ambassador to Australia.

And you’re basing this fantasy on what? The consistency and clarity of the Trump administration so far?….laughable.

Previously formally known as Strong Woman whom may be a guy8:29 am 21 Jun 25

What sad point are you trying to make with that video?

Anthony who?

Albo declared today he’ll meet Trump “soon”. Have there been two more foreign affairs lightweight embarrassments than Wong and Albo ?

” Have there been two more foreign affairs lightweight embarrassments than Wong and Albo?”
Well, ScoMo’s marvellous diplomatic engagement with China – which saw billions of dollars worth of export trade lost, was hardly a shining moment of ‘foreign affairs’ glory. Imagine what further havoc ScoMo could have wreaked, if he had also (secretly) made himself Minister for Foreign Affairs?

And you have probably forgotten, when Seselja was dispatched to the Solomon Islands, to prevent a potential security agreement between the Solomon Islands and China. A truly momentous ‘foreign affairs’ triumph for Australia!

Perhaps you can highlight similar failings, on the world stage, by Albo and Wong?

Yes. Any other silly questions in your box of “propaganda for amateurs” cards?

So also a China kowtower JS, who would have thought. It was so kind of them to give us covid, how dare we push back.

So far Wongbanese have stuffed up our relationships with the USA, Israel, they’ve weakened our national security and sided with Hamas. Brilliant hey.

@Penfold
PS Oh and being called a liar by the head of another ally – that’s certainly embarassing on the foreign stage, don’t you think?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/31/macron-accuses-australian-pm-of-lying-over-submarine-deal

@Penfold
“Wongbanese”
Seriously? Puerile perjoratives – is that the best you have, Penfold? As for the rest of your drivel, you are entiteld to your baseless opinions.

Geez JS, you’re really getting desperate now. So Macron had a meltdown because we refused to sign up for the next stage of their subs. The Virginia Class is rather a better option, for those of us who case about national security.

No, being scolded by Macron is not at all embarrassing. But being belted by your wife on the world stage is.

JS a sense of humour seems to escape you. Can I suggest watching some Seinfeld or maybe F Troop.

@Penfold
No, Penfold, if you were capable of being humorous, I’d recognise it

@Penfold
” So Macron had a meltdown because we refused to sign up for the next stage of their subs.”
Really? So, if the Albanese government reneged on a contract that cost them $830m to tear up, and then followed up with a payment of $500m, so another supplier can build their own subs, without any guarantee that Australia will actually see our subs, you’d be wailing like a puppy that’s been left outside on a cold winter’s night.

Instead you suggest you “case” (I think you mean care) about national security. If that’s the case, then explain, if we are still not actually guaranteed any subs under the AUKUS pact, it’s subject to Trump’s whim, how is that looking after our national security?

PS I won’t even respond to your pathetic (I guess you’d say humourous) observation over a marital spat.

Justsaying,
Im not sure what you are on about, almost every Pengold comment is the definition of hilarity.

@cheyw14
I’d suggest it’s hysteria rather than hilarity, chewy … but Penfold certainly does a great clown impersonation.

Oh dear JS, resorting to insults once more. If you knew anything about the contracts with the French you’d be aware that Australia reneged on nothing.

We refused to sign the new contract and honoured the existing contract at the time, which then expired. Maybe a bit of research required there buddy 😉

@Penfold
Insults? Pot and kettle?

Well, if they had done their due diligence, perhaps the original contract wouldn’t have been signed and it wouldn’t have cost the Australian taxpayer $800m when “We refused to sign the new contract”?

You’re right … a bit of research was required there.

Well done for familiarising yourself with some details JS. See, research can be most beneficial.

@Penfold
Yeah – as I said, it’s a shame the signatories to the original contract didn’t do that research … could have saved the Aussie taxpayer $800m. Let’s hope the ‘hail mary’ (or is that the ‘pretty please Mr Trump’) AUKUS pact, doesn’t end up costing us another $500m with nothing to show for it.

When Labor’s net zero pipe dream is estimated to cost $9 trillion between now and 2060, $800 million isn’t much.

@Penfold
You forgot to mention, that’s A$7 to 9 trillion in capital investment over the next 35 years, Penfold … i.e. there will be something tangible for the money.

I doubt anyone, but an absolute moron, would think that paying $800 million to get a shredded copy of a contract is value for money.

“…Labor’s net zero pipe dream is estimated to cost $9 trillion…” lol not by any actual experts….or adults.

Something tangible – yes, a bankrupt country. Guess you’re unaware that the amount is roughly 10% of GDP per year. What are you going to cancel – defence, welfare, medicare, the NDIS, or perhaps the education system ?

And global emissions may have gone up 50% by then anyway based on the China and India projections. Brilliant JS !

@Penfold
Roughly 10% of GDP over 35 years … which makes it quite a good infrastructure investment.

Penfold making it up….tedious.

“When Labor’s net zero pipe dream is estimated to cost $9 trillion.”

Pengold now apparently believes in forecasts again. But of course only when he thinks it suits.

They arent facts you know.

Come on JS, tell us what you’re ditching in the name of climate zealotry – health, education, defence, electricity ?

@Penfold
You seem to be frothing at the mouth, over forecast costs for the next 35 years, Penfold, but simply dismiss the actual waste of $800m, and potentially a further $500m, should Trump decide AUKUS doesn’t meet his “America first” measure – meaning neither payment will have delivered anything to Australia.

Wow – you take hypocrisy to a whole new level.

Tedious but unsurprisingly the terminally dim are trying to blame Albo for Trump’s actions.

Meanwhile in the real world, while most sensible people are hoping for regime change in Iran, Trump will be making a massive mistake domestically if he goes to war with Iran because part of his popular appeal until now has been his promises to end wars.

Not just a whopper slap in the face to Albo but a massive slap in the face to all genuine Australians.

Sterling Stillwater3:01 pm 18 Jun 25

32Roadster, please define “genuine Australians”.

Describing it as a slap in the face assumes you are dealing with an otherwise rational and ethical actor.

Perhaps Trump didn’t like all the insults that Albo and Rudd dished out. Brilliant politicians those two.

Penfold and yet Trump is an absolute genius?? doesnt even know how a tariff works,

Well say what you want about Trump, Australia needs the USA more than the USA needs Australia. And Albo has made a complete clown of himself around the relationship. 🤡

Sterling Stillwater3:06 pm 18 Jun 25

Really, Penfold? How, exactly?

By his statements standing up for Australia’s interests with regard to trade, defence expenditure, the Middle East? You would prefer kowtowing?

Needing America is a longer game than needing any particular President, and the future of that need remains uncertain.

None of that drivel is true.

Sterling, when China expands its territorial ambitions to include resource rich Australia, some of us would rather like the security of US protection. Trump is the current custodian of the White House, let’s hope Albo doesn’t weaken the relationship any more than he has already.

I wouldn’t lose sleep over that Penfold. China will be lucky if it’s successful with a Taiwan takeover this century. They are going to need nukes to takeover Australia and after that it wont be good for much. Australia is one of the most secure countries in the world.

Sterling Stillwater1:33 pm 19 Jun 25

Penfold, thanks for acknowledging that I said Australia needs America more than it needs a particular president.

You said absolutely nothing to justify your clown claim. I am not shocked by that failure.

Tel54 is 100% correct.

You’d have to be very uniformed (or amazingly thick) to believe that China could invade Australia. Especially after they’re watched the disaster of Putin’s failed war unwind in Ukraine a country that borders Russia. The logistics of invading country as far away as Australia with an economy already facing huge challenges is just not viable. But it makes a great talking point for culture wars dummies.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.