24 April 2025

Has Labor now jumped the shark over public service jobs?

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
29
Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet building

Labor says the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet would be just one of 10 departments to be shut down if the Coalition implements its plans. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

It became clear very early in this federal election campaign that the Coalition went too far with its rhetoric about public servants in Canberra, but Labor now has also strayed into the realm of fantasy with its latest response to Peter Dutton’s on-again, off-again plans.

To recap, the Opposition Leader used his budget reply speech the evening before the election was called to say he would be getting rid of 41,000 public servants in Canberra.

The Coalition was also stating around the same time that it would require all public servants to return to the office five days a week if elected to government.

The idea of ending work from home went down like a lead zeppelin in the electorate and caused Mr Dutton no small amount of grief from within Coalition ranks.

Then came the backdown on both fronts.

The Opposition Leader apologised for his work-from-home policy and also eased up on his 41,000 sackings plan, saying those cuts would only be made through voluntary redundancies and natural attrition.

Additionally, there would be no cuts to frontline services and definitely no touching the workforce at national security agencies.

If the Coalition loses the election, it could probably be traced back to that point and Mr Dutton’s unravelling on his own stairway to heaven.

Dutton buckled and Labor leapt on the perceived weakness.

READ ALSO Labor says Dutton’s APS job cuts would ‘shut down government’

It was always a ridiculous notion that (mostly) working mothers would be forced back to the office full-time.

Just as nonsensical is the thought that 41,000 public service jobs could go without affecting frontline services.

Yet in continually making that point, Labor has also jumped the shark on the topic of public service jobs.

On Wednesday (23 April), the ALP took its scare tactics over public service jobs to an absurd level by saying Mr Dutton plans to shut down the Australian Government.

Oh, it had the numbers to prove it. Lots of people had worked hard on them.

By using how the Australian Public Service Commission classifies agencies according to their functions, and taking out frontline services and national security agencies, it would leave 32 per cent of the APS workforce.

In other words, just 61,610 positions would remain for the Coalition to find its 41,000 job cuts.

Labor ministers trotted out a list (remember they’d worked hard on these numbers) of 10 departments that would be gone, along with the number of jobs lost in each.

Here they are:

  • Department of Education (1,777)
  • Department of Health and Aged Care (7,571)
  • Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (5,479)
  • Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (4,377)
  • Department of Finance (2,182)
  • Department of Industry, Science and Research (5,656)
  • Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts (2,451)
  • Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (1,401)
  • Department of Social Services (3,581)
  • Department of the Treasury (2,218).

READ ALSO Third leaders’ debate draws out softer sides, for a brief moment or two

Then, even after all these departments were abolished, the government says, there would still be “a further 4,300 jobs to be cut elsewhere across the public service”, and that means smaller agencies would also need to go.

Whoa!

The numbers say this is equivalent to all the following agencies being shut down:

  • National Indigenous Australians Agency (1,464)
  • National Audit Office (475)
  • Fair Work Commission (396)
  • Future Fund Management Agency (343)
  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (246)
  • Australian Skills Quality Authority (249)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (256)
  • National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (173)
  • Productivity Commission (178)
  • Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (178)
  • Australian Research Council (137)
  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (142)
  • Workplace Gender Equality Agency (48)
  • Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission (16).

While the point Public Service Minister Katy Gallagher and Health Minister Mark Butler were trying to make is that is an “absolute nonsense” (as Senator Gallagher put it) to think you can slash 41,000 jobs and still maintain the same levels of frontline service and national security – the sell was that this is what will happen under a Dutton-led Coalition government.

And the sell was too much – too over the top – because no one really believes the Coalition actually wants to shut down the government.

By using those exact words – “shut down government” – when pushing out their skewed numbers, Labor has joined the Coalition in using the public service to score political points with cynical statements.

The public service, and the voting public, are smarter than that and perhaps deserve a bit more respect from both sides.

Join the conversation

29
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Speaking of porkies, Albanese has now admitted that he did, indeed, fall off the stage.

We’re at the eating a hot dog the wrong way portion of the campaign Dutton and his rusted on cranks & boosters must be getting desperate with over half a million Australians already voted.

Capital Retro3:57 pm 24 Apr 25

You mean it was a staged event?

Actually, Albo tells so many porkies that even his chooks won’t come at feed time when he calls them.

Thanks for demonstrating my point about cranks latching on to nonsense Capital.

Pardon the pun hey CR. He’s certainly racking them up. Speaking of the chooks, Seano’s not far behind Albo. Should checkout his latest vapour link which says nothing he thinks it does.

Dutton wanted to put the terminally dim Jacinta Price in charge of an Elon Musk-esq DOGE clown show with the goal of sacking 50,000 Australian workers… all because he naively thought some Trump cred would score him political and culture wars points.

Problem is Trump is a disaster and Australians (and increasingly Americans) can see it. Dutton’s flip flopping on yet another policy as he tries to bury another thought bubble doesn’t mean he can be trusted if he’s elected to not revert to his initially stupid idea.

Gregg Heldon2:22 pm 24 Apr 25

Why is she terminally dim? And why disrespect by not giving her, her indigenous name?
Is there racism or misogyny involved here?
All genuine questions.

None of those questions are genuine though are the Gregg which is how I know my comment struck home. The true can be confronting.

Why is she “terminally dim”? Well that would be her habit of answering challenging questions with meaningless word salad. As to the issue of disrespect her website is Jacinta price dot com …so I think you’re making that one up.

The charge of misogyny did get a laugh though, nothing I said was gendered …indeed you seem to be suggesting that challenging a woman (or more likely I’m guessing a woman you support) is some how inherently misogynistic which is just nonsense, but it does appear to be a window into your own views on gender and equality which I’d suggest you examine before attempting to question others.

* truth….I think I posted (another) typo with “the true” but I like “the true” it has a nice ring to it.

It’s quite the shame that the right, since Regan and in increasingly disastrous ways for western democracy have abandoned “the true” in order to “win”, but in the long run as we see with the Trump economic disaster a losing prospect for all of us..

Labor have made many absurd statements this election campaign, including the “shut down government” howler.

There’s been the recurring mediscare porky, the laughable claim they’d reduce power prices, the nuclear scare, claiming they’ll build more houses, reduce immigration.

I’m waiting for them to offer $1 million to every household.

@Penfold
Yet the Libs are also claiming they will lower power prices, build more houses, etc. and you accept these ‘promises’ without question, even defend them.

You might even garner some credibility, if you objectively (emphasis on objectively) examine both of the major parties statements, rather than your usual jaundiced bias.

Well JS the article is about Labor’s shark jumping, I’m just adding to the list.

You’re sounding like a bit of a teal there, demanding “objectivity” yet constantly attacking the Coalition and complaining about bias. Pot, kettle ?

@Penfold
Nice deflection. Thee article is about the proposal the potential sacking of 41,000 public servants. You simply used it to have yet another of your anti-Labor rants – which I have then suggested would be more objective if you applied the same standard to Liberal announcements.

You use the term ‘Teal’ as if it’s an insult – which really shows how biased you are. I’m definitely pro-independent, and have never shied from that. Unlike you, and your fawning to the Coalition, I’ve acknowldeged faults in both major parties.

Yes JS, teal is certainly an insult. It means preaching one thing and doing another. Standing on a pulpit of transparency but not being transparent. Claiming to be open minded but voting with the greens 77% of the time.

The only independents who act independently are Pocock and Haines.

As for the APS, why on earth have Labor added 41,000 new staff ? A whopping 25% in three years.

” Standing on a pulpit of transparency but not being transparent.”

Explain how the teals have not being transparent without sounding silly, sorry sillier.

Well speaking of silly, who could forget Zali Steggall worshipping the climate change gods from her Toyota Landcuiser.

Or Monique Ryan running away from any microphone as her husband was creeping around Kooyong pinching Amelia Hamer’s corflutes.

Or none of them telling voters who they will preference in a hung parliament.

Thanks for asking.

I see you went the “sillier” option Penfold, not wonder really that you can’t back up your claim about transparency, all you have is puerile drivel aimed at misdirection.

It’s unsurprising that the Liberal Party is losing blue ribbon Liberal seats in educated electorates to sensible moderates with the likes of you on the case champ.

Got any more vapour links for us Seano ?

Capital Retro3:55 pm 24 Apr 25

Yeah, Zali would have created a big carbon footprint when she was a global professional snow skier but she never apologises for that.

Where is the teal “lack of transparency” Penfold? if you can’t back the claim be an adult and admit it, these attempts at redirection are boring.

“Yeah, Zali would have created a big carbon footprint when she was a global professional snow skier but she never apologises for that.”

Even for you and Penfold this is a dumb line of attack Capital. Why does she need to apologise? Explain it to me.

In the meantime she’s been quite the effective campaign for clean energy so really she’s saved emissions and saved you money helping to keep a lid on power prices, I sure she’d say you’re welcome.

Labour lied to win the last election saying Australians would be better off under them and they continue to lie to win this one. How can they do this knowing Australians will suffer.

Because Dutton isn’t lying lo, he is a wisdom of truth only.

What do you expect of politicians?

And to be fair, their claim is fairly unclaimable one way or the other through evidence. What ‘better off’ actually is means very different things to different people.

Because none of that is true.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.